The following evidence provides inescapable “beyond a reasonable doubt” proof that the south tower plane was a modified military drone aircraft and was not and simply could not possibly have been flight 175, piloted by Marwan al-Shehhi, who as a “pilot”, the 9/11 Commission considered no more experienced or as well “trained” than his ex roommate Hani Hanjour of Pentagon fame who had difficulty controlling and flying a single engine Cessna.
At a glance:
Vd design dive limit – flutter testing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImSuZjvkATw
“The dive speed is the absolute maximum speed above which the aircraft must not fly.”
Boeing A1NM TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
Airspeed Limits: VD = 420 KCAS to 17,854 ft/.91M above 23,000 ft, linear variation between these points. VMO = 360 KCAS/.86M
Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study–UA175_AA11 NTSB NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARDhttp://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/Radar_Data_Impact_Speed_Study–AA11,_UA175.pdf
“For much of it’s final descent, UAL175 maintained a descent rate between 4000 feet per minute and 8000 feet per minute. During the descent from 12,000 feet to 6000 feet, the aircraft groundspeed remained between 500 – 520 knots. As the aircraft made it’s final descent to 1000 feet, it ACCELERATED and impacted Word Trade Center tower #2 at approximately 510 knots groundspeed.”
510 knots = 587 MPH
Standard (unmodified) Boeing 767 design dive limit VD = 420 KCAS (knots calibrated airspeed).
Difference: NINETY KNOTS (104mph)
Close to or over Vd limit (flight envelope incursion) commercial airliners, precedents:
EgyptAir990 – with catastrophic structural failure @ 425 knots EAS (equivalent airspeed) = .99M at 22,000 ft alt.
Overall Context (including analysis using Vmo/Mmo as benchmark):
Please Watch the Documentary “September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor”
1.26:50 – Passenger planes or military drones? 1.28:20 – Impossible speeds 1.37:30 – What happened to the passengers? 1.38:35 – The cellphone calls
For specific timeslots, use the following link to access the vid http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167
..you know what to do, and please feel free to comment! thanks, NAM007.
We can’t not talk about these issues no matter what the implication might be. And it’s not about to go away, especially not when it’s so freaking obvious (for those with the eyes to see and the rational faculty and scientific viewpoint by which to comprehend).
“That which hurts, also instructs.” ~ Ben Franklin