A Participant’s Explanation of Arbitration
and Summary of Award and Bill
by Phil Hudok
I discovered through extensive research that at minimum in 1933 the people had become enemies of their own government by its utilizing war powers. A changed government confiscated private property by threat and force. An insolvent debtor government became servant to the Creditor. The takeover stripped the government of its sovereignty. The government could no longer be the real party in interest in any interaction, thus constituting fraud. However, in truth, fraud was perpetrated much earlier via the 1783 Treaty of Peace.
There exists no explicit authority within Article three, section two of the Constitution for the United States of America c1819 for an altering of due process and the procedures thereof as practiced for longer than memory by man under the absolute authority of the Doctrine of Customs. By, under and pursuant to the Doctrine of Delegated Authority a delegated authority cannot in turn be delegated. By, under and pursuant to Article 3 section 1 Congress may ordain and establish inferior Courts, but by its clear and plain language does not provide for the Courts to make and effectuate their own modes of process and procedure, nor can Congress grant the Courts a delegated authority. He who creates controls. Therefore, Rules Enabling Act (ch. 651, Pub.L. 73–415, 48 Stat. 1064, enacted June 19, 1934, 28 U.S.C. § 2072) and any acts emanating therefrom, thereof and thereto were, and are, null and void at the moment of inception, not voidable. So here we clearly see a change in law form, and an altering of Article 3 section 2, but it was not done by Amendment. Therefore, there was a change in the contract that allowed myself an opening to counter-offer.
On December 27, 2018 the counter-offer was served and the basis of this was that proper notification of the changes had not been given. This was done under the Creator’s Law and Law Form under Qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur and Pro rex regum et heredes’. This is your true Birthright, not the inferior birthright being pushed by several self-proclaimed gurus. This is what allows every American to accept, acknowledge and claim, not only the counter-offer, but also demand and receive the remedy required, due and owing pursuant to the Award.
With no response as required by the counter-offer, ample opportunity was granted in good faith and clean hands to allow the UNITED STATES to answer with their proof of authority for conducting operations. They could not do so factually, hence the silence. Silence is agreement under the Law of Ancient Custom. Within the counter-offer was a provision requiring the dispute to be submitted to a neutral party, once again pursuant the Law of Ancient Customs.
A hearing was conducted, after proper Notice was served, on August 12, 2019. The Award was issued on August 19, 2019.
Below is a summarization of the Award I choose to share:
5. This section refers to the contract established, J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, as counter offer to the contract held by the constitution and the five claimants as citizens bound to it. A legal and binding contract under contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, is now the working contract. The respondents are bound by its terms and obligations, not that of the constitution. No fraud was found in establishment of this contract.
6. Self-explanatory, all elements forming a legally binding contract are present.
7. The contract, J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, clearly states if there’s a dispute it goes to arbitration
8. It was alleged, in contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, that all 573 points were breached. By their silence the respondents proved all facts in the favor of the claimants; they didn’t have the right to do any of those actions.
9. Under contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, any interaction past present and future (i.e. traffic stops, court appearance) are null, void, of no effect.
11. Because of contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© a relationship (presumptive) was established between the claimants and respondents, the respondents having had a fiduciary, trustee obligation and duty to respond. The respondents failed to respond being a breach of obligation and duty as government officers.
16. The parties agreed, under contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, that any previous interaction (i.e. Traffic stop violation, court proceeding) is void.
19. Simply put, pursuant to the complaint there’s a dispute. Claimants complied with contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS©, the Respondents failed to comply.
26. The Arbitrator, here, finds the Respondent, by their silence, agreed they had a fiduciary trustee obligation to correct the records. This is where an injunction is created and a return of property afforded. The wording is not to be construed other than the contextual manner in which it appears. The award may be adjusted upon further findings.
27. Everything the Respondents did previously are void, being every interaction and anything emanating from them.
28. This is restatement of injunction. The Respondents are wholly restricted from interaction of any kind…FOREVER! Everything ever done previously is VOID!
44. The claims have been brought forth by reference. Box 1 – The original contact is brought forth and incorporated. Box 2 – The Respondents have been found in breach of contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© and the contract is irrevocable. The Respondents acted in bad faith with unclean hands and breached their duties. Box 3 – The Respondents agree to discontinue anything emanating from the Claimants, but failed to perform. Box 4 -Respondents agreed to compensate for gross misrepresentation and failed to do so. Box 5 – Acts of fraud. Box 6 – Respondents agreed to a return of all property, assets etc., and failed to do so.
45. The Facts: a. There is/was a binding contract, b. there is/was a duty to communicate, c. Changes were made to the Original Contract (the Constitution) allowing for a counter offer, d. Contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© with interests is irrevocable, e. Respondents have agreed to contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© are bound to it by waiver (Maxim of law “silence is acquiescence”).
48. Respondents failed to respond therefore they tacitly agreed.
50. The Respondents have waived any defense. 1. Establishes an age of majority to validly enter contract, 2. No one entering the contract is incapable, 3. Contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© is binding on all parties, and Respondents have failed in their obligations under it, 4. Respondents failed perform and the Claimants are due remedy/relief under the contractual terms, 5. Full audit and liquidation of estate and trusts. Claimants assume the position of Creditor, 7. This award takes full force and effect immediately.
52. This sets the injunction, much like a restraining order and immunity.
53. A full audit of estate and trusts emanating from the Claimants, whatever it may be.
54. Release/liquidation of all property and assets to the claimants, being essentially what is found from section 53.
Private Law Bill for Settlement has been an available recourse to Americans since the beginning. The Bill provides a remedy for harm caused by the government.
As my Brother’s Keeper, it is being presented by me, Phillip Hudok, to benefit all Americans.
The summary of my Bill for Settlement of the Award is as follows:
– There is to be an opt-in process for the beneficiaries designed to be simple and rapid.
– There is to be an unconditional release and setting at Liberty of the beneficiaries.
– Beneficiaries, are as defined in the bill, all Americans that opt-in and includes their immediate family (minors). For married couples, both adults need to opt-in which then includes their children.
– Any case past or present is void.
– Beneficiaries are to receive immediate and unconditional indemnification.
– Beneficiaries are to receive immediate and unconditional immunity.
– There is immediate issuance of necessary documentation of the indemnification and the immunity for the beneficiary.
– A return of all property and assets.
– All records and systems of records, other than the provided Diplomatic status, are to be expunged and destroyed.
– A land patent will be issued, titled in fee simple absolute and possession (the highest form obtainable). It allows you to leave it to your heirs and under a land patent it is free and clear from government obstruction. It must be issued from the Land Patent Office, not from the Bureau of Land Management.
– An accounting and return of any and all accounts, of any nature, shape, cause, form, format and kind held or managed by any entity and emanating from the beneficiary.
Look for regular updates on www.hudok.info
Everything thus said is documented below. Should your decision be to opt-in, read, understand and follow the opt-in directions fully explained in the documents below.
As did the founders, let us all come together to correct the grave situation we are facing not only for ourselves, but for our posterity, the children.
<CLICK> Arbitration Award Document (It’s Real Folks)
<CLICK> Award Summary (It Will Blow Your Socks Off!)
<CLICK> Congressional Private Side Enforcement Bill (Settlement Coming!)
<CLICK> Opt-In Document Note: Please Follow Directions On Page 2 Of The Document
[Time Is Of The Essence – November 1 Opt-In Deadline]
<CLICK> Arbitration Overview Video on Brighteon.com
<CLICK> Arbitration Overview Video on YouTube