Tonight from Jim Stone:
OATHKEEPERS INFLITRATING SUBVERSIVE GROUPS, THIS IS PURE GOLD
NavyJack Operation HYPO After Action Report: Infiltrating Violent Protest Organizations
As many of you know, Oath Keepers initiated Operation HYPO in response to the increasingly violent protests that broke out across the country following the election. We had some members already in a position to quickly infiltrate the protest organizations that were active in support of Operation Sabot. I myself assumed an identity of an individual from another state with all of the necessary elements to ensure success of my assigned responsibilities. Working during the day, I would travel by night to meetings and protests in various cities. Most weekends were consumed with assimilating reports from other operatives, grooming equipment and planning our activities. Our entire team had immense support from Oath Keepers senior leadership.
In my case, it took quite a while to become accepted into the groups that I was responsible for observing. I think a lot of this was because I am a little bit older than our other operatives. I dyed my hair and bought clothing appropriate for the assignment. By actually participating in a large number of protest activities, I was eventually “recruited“ into a series of organizations with increasing levels of responsibility. It took a month of steady involvement before any of the really hard-core group leaders would even talk to me. My military and post-active duty DoD experience was extremely valuable. I learned to behave as they behave and to “trigger“ on appropriate issues. I also learned that the brain-washing that moves people into these organizations is mostly external to the organizations themselves. The people joining are brain-washed by numerous sources before they even participate in their first protest or direct action. The MSM, our colleges and universities, social media and leftist alternative news organizations are the primary sources of the initial brain-washing that is taking place.
The radicalization process is unique to each person, but generally follows a pattern of being very rapid for those with little or no responsibilities in their daily life to long and laborious for those with a real life outside of the movement. Young, under-employed single white males are the vanguard of these movements.
In order to gain trust, we found that the best thing to do was to be aloof and skeptical with regard to the plans and activities of the groups and to be independent and outspoken when plans were being discussed in our presence. Most of the details associated with “direct actions“ were not discussed with anyone other than the group of individuals assigned to carry out the specific task. In the groups that I was assigned to penetrate, there were plenty of blowhards thumping their chest about something they had done that demonstrated their skill and ability to participate or lead. Most of this was hyperbole, but the newer members would eat it up like young soldiers listening to the inflated heroics of a platoon member that had only been with the unit a month longer than them. We all know the type.
While most of our operatives started and stayed with one specific group, I was unable to initially penetrate the group I was responsible for infiltrating. I had to work my way up the ladder, moving from one group to another in order to achieve my objective. In my migration from group to group, I found that political ideology was a significant factor in the determination of what types of activities the groups would sponsor; ranging from sit-ins to marches to direct action. I can broadly classify these ideologies as liberal socialists, communists and anarchists.
The liberal socialists are primarily coming out of our higher education system. They are comprised of professors, students and under-employed graduates. They are primarily white with a roughly equal split between male/female. They are not militant. They are willing to conduct blockades, marches and sit-ins.
The communists are a much broader spectrum of society with a strong leaning towards immigration issues. The communists actively recruit from a wide pool of candidates, including liberal socialists, the LBGT community, the environmental activists and the anti-white racist groups (Black Lives Matter, La Raza, Islamic Fundamentalists, etc.). They have a significant number of minorities in their ranks and they are militant in their operations and planning. The communists encourage independent action of their members to assimilate members from groups like Black Lives Matter, La Raza and other less militant organizations like ANSWER Coalition. They have no ethical boundaries. To communists, the ends always justify the means. They will do everything that the liberal socialist do in order to protest an issue and always take it one step further. They are not inclined to conduct direct actions.
The anarchists are by far the most dangerous of these groups. They are organized like militias. They actively train and practice their operations. They have discipline and zero tolerance for weakness. They have a number of former military personnel providing expertise to enhance security, logistics and martial arts capabilities. The majority are physical fit, military age males. They are primarily white with few minority members. Their leadership tends to be either former military, a proven leader from the occupy movement or a highly educated alpha-male. They are far more capable than their recent activities would demonstrate. They have formed community defense organizations and are idolized for their willingness to take action from the other groups discussed above. They are however anarchists that despise communism as much as they despise capitalism. They see patriots and constitutionalists as their primary enemy. To them, everyone is a NAZI or a fascist unless they are an anarchist. There is no debate allowed on these issues, ever. They operate under various names, but the vast majority identify with the anti-fascist movement. With the election of President Trump, their membership has increased exponentially. There are at least 50,000 nationwide. They have been able to assimilate much of the “occupy“ and “black-bloc“ movements. Most of what these organizations accomplish are classified as direct actions. They will participate in a protest or a march, but they are not big fans of passive resistance.
For those of you that are not familiar with the term “direct action†, these are very precise coordinated operations conducted by small groups (4-6 members) that have very specific unit and overall goals. The planned smoke bombing of an Inauguration Ball is a good example of a direct action. Our team foiled this operation. We informed the DC Police Department, the National Press Club and the Inauguration Ball security team leaders of these plans on January 9th, 2017. Direct targeting of individuals and businesses are common direct action activities for the Anti-Fascists. Destruction of property (burning your car, damaging your house, busting the windows out where you work, etc.) are standard direct actions against targeted individuals of these groups. Ask James O’Keefe from Project Veritas or Milo Yiannopoulos from Breitbart News. They are both now having to deal with this. The following video was recorded at Portland International Airport last night. The PDX Black-bloc initiated “direct action†to assault individuals who they believed were supporters of the President. You can watch a longer version of this event, now being characterized as a riot, here.
This is a lengthy report, the rest is HERE
In the comments below the report, he continues with this:
The protesters on the ground see large crowds and continuous support from the MSM for their protests. They hear former President Obama telling them they need to keep going. They are energized and angry. The people in the middle, the organizers, don’t really know where this is going; they do believe that with all of these angry voices something has to give. The people at the top (Democracy Partners, Soros, globalist and NEOCON interest groups) know this is just the opening salvo of a revolution.
In Egypt all it took was a few hundred thousand protesters to drive out the President. Here that won’t happen. The people at the top know that violence is the only way forward. In the Ukraine they had to put a sniper up on a rooftop shooting in both directions (protesters and police) to start a civil war in order to force the President out. That is the formula that will be followed here if they can get the protests to grow over the next couple of weeks.
If the protests were to slow and the anger subsides, the globalists only have two cards left to play;
1. The Kennedy solution, or
2. Economic collapse.
1. The Kennedy solution, or
2. Economic collapse.
Both are tough cards to play because you can only use them once. I don’t know the answer. If I had to guess, I think they will attempt #1 because the President has shown ZERO willingness to compromise on his campaign promises. If they fail and the President continues to unwind the United States from the control of the globalists for even another year, they will play card #2. The alternative would be that there would be no way for them to ever regain control. I do not think they will let that happen.
This report is well worth reading all the way through. If you skipped the link, go back and click it.
Anonymous sent: “Bikers are the answer. They would just love to take care of this kind of crap. All they need is a safe place for their bikes with a few guys on guard, then enter the scene discretely in sufficient numbers, and leave the same way. Of course the cops will be called out, but not before some heads are properly busted. With a little more time they could take them to the clubhouse and get better acquainted. A few of these encounters, and these rioters will go back to something safer like armed robberies and pushing drugs.”
My response: Might work if they could keep CIA moles and the NSA out of their business, remember, the CIA and NSA HAVE TO be in on these riots because if they were not, and they were serving the public interest, they would shut them down. So the bikers would have to be careful with this.
Anonymous sent: “Re Berkeley riots — Don’t forget that Janet Napolitano, Clinton friend, fellow lesbian, NWO creep, and Obama’s first DHS Secretary is the Pres of the Univ of Calif system and Berkeley! YUK! Apparently she went into the hospital for cancer treatment Jan 17th but has been fully functioning on campus since shortly after.”
My response: That would explain a lot.
***
Comment on Milo protesters at Berkeley
I have spent time thinking about the following, and this post is now done
It has become clear that the highest levels of governance at Berkeley ordered the riots, and that every “protester” was likely paid.
Despite what you have been told, witnesses at Berkely have confirmed that the police were told to stand down. The top staff at Berkeley clearly ordered the violent protests and told the police to stand down because that is the only way stand down orders would have been given. The photo shows the Police standing around doing nothing inside the student union building while the riots went wild outside.
The only way the police would have been told to stand down is if the staff and faculty at Berkeley ordered the riots and wanted them to happen. It would be logical then to conclude that whatever damage happened was ordered to happen. A Starbucks was trashed and knowing what a communist lib joint Starbucks is, Berkeley probably had permission to trash it. Milo had an expensive media transmitter trailer there with a large telescopic antenna that got trashed. This is seen laying on its side being burned in some of the riot photos. This type of trailer will have an antenna that telescopes upwards approximately 50 feet. It is for high definition broadcasts at completely random locations where connectivity is not assured. Destroying it was a major act of vandalism that you can bet Berkeley will not pay for even though it has become fairly obvious that even the dean was in on the riots.This is good cause to shut down Berkeley. If Berkeley is so flooded with communist low life trash that in their form of “tolerance” they did this to a gay speaker just because he happened to have a conservative side, it is TIME TO SHUT BERKELEY DOWN. Berkeley is clearly rotten all the way to the top. America should not be sending kids to be psychologically sterilized into pure communism rather than learn anything meaningful. The fact these riots happened the way they happened – with clear support of the entire staff cements my point in bed rock, it cannot be denied. Berkeley is a seditious institution working directly against the best interests of the United States. It cannot be repaired.
If leftists believe it is acceptable to protest Milo by burning his transmitter trailer and torching campus over him being there, then it ought to be acceptable for the right wing to respond by burning abortion clinics, and the brainwashing “humanities” centers at the universities that use language courses as a venue for erasing brains. These are polar opposites to Milo and Breitbart, and fair is fair. I can’t see how SOROS is not in jail already with him arranging most of this garbage.
Obviously the right won’t resort to such tactics because it is the working portion of society that does not have time for it. Or the attitude for it. Or the lack of sophistication for it. Or the hypocrisy for it. All the while the left talks about free speech, when anyone says something the left does not agree with, the response is outrage and violence. The left is obviously not about free speech, it is about control of discourse and runs completely opposite of the American way.
It is time for people on the right to stop being tolerant of the left’s intolerance. It is in the nature of the right to just let the left blow steam, do name calling, and for the right to then not take action. But if the right never answers back, it will be steamrolled. Obviously Trump is the right answering back to leftist lunacy, but Trump is not an excuse to say “oh, it will be taken care of” just as the right has always said, Trump or not.
The so-called protesters at Berkeley were the same paid protesters that did the inauguration, and also cause mayhem in Mexico. They are international, and that likely means Soros. They expect to get away with anything they do. However, a 60 mph can of coke to the forehead would ensure at least one of them did not get off the hook so easy, or a rock, or whatever.
If anyone sees these punks tearing things up, the answer is NOT to run, the answer instead is to put them in the hospital. If anyone thinks the police are going to make a difference with these types they are delusional, because like at Berkeley, the police will know the protesters are paid and will be told to stand down. Therefore, the only answer is direct physical action from the public at large, that a paid protester will regret for weeks, or months, into the future. Get enough of them hurt, and if any show up next time, the price tag will be much higher for whoever is funding it. And heck, if they are going to do you or anyone else harm, whatever comes to them is exactly what they deserve.
The left, which is backed 100 percent by the Jewish community, cannot be allowed a monopoly on violence. If they honestly believe they have that monopoly, (and they, at present do, which is precisely why the professional protesters never answer for anything they do) the sky will become the limit, and one day it will be you that burns.
Anonymous sent:
The berkeley protests……I have a friend there, and just fyi, she said all the violent protesters were clearly outsiders coming to instigate. It was a very peaceful demonstration from students. Just be intelligent, the hegelian diaclectic works both ways….they are trying to divide and conquer making both sides look bad while the elite keep getting richer, and our bombs keep dropping. And I’m sorry, Trump’s all Jewish staff proves he is in on it just as much as obama and bush. You will see, you will be let down. Don’t put faith in anyone but God.”
My comment: Trump’s staff is not all Jewish. However, it is heavily loaded with Jews, because they know very well the rule of “keeping your enemies close”.
Trump’s actions so far (other than the Islamic stuff) have been BANG ON, and even the immigration bans are something he said he’d do. He is delivering as promised. So I am more worried about one of the Jews surrounding him killing him.