Santa Rosa, CA
June 2, 2016
by Rich Scheck
It seems totally appropriate in our “transgender era” that a person like Hillary
Clinton has emerged as a leading candidate for the presidency.
The former Secretary of State is typical of many recent female political figures
who have demonstrated their ability to compete with their male counterparts by
showing a high level of testicularity in foreign affairs.
What they lack in traditional feminine grace, they attempt to make up for
with male characteristics like relying on violence to get their way.
It seems that in order to break the glass ceiling these “ladies” perceive as surrounding their claim to legitimacy, they harbor the belief that they must be willing to bomb anyone and anything that challenges the Washington Consensus.
Margaret Thatcher, Condi Rice, Madeline Albright, and now Hillary are typical of those June Terpstra calls “Hollow Women of the Hegemon!”
http://www.academia.edu/3797242/Hollow_Women_of_the_Hegemon
These are females who are excessively aggressive and embrace the policies of imperialism so typical of their male counterparts like George W. Bush and Barack Obama who have committed us to endless wars based on lies.
These gals have the equivalent of a “Napoleon Complex” and must act out their inadequacies by proving to the world they are willing to use force to solve problems rather than relying on feminine skills of caring and communication: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_complex.
They act hawkishly to gain the respect they need to function psychologically
and fend off criticism of them as sexist as they use force in their quest for legitimacy.
Rather than heeding the warnings of our Founders to avoid foreign entanglements, hegemonic women like Hillary “go in search of monsters to destroy abroad!” They justify wars based on lies by evoking American Exceptionalism, vague notions of “global manifest destiny” and the so-called right to protect (“humanitarian intervention”) that has led to the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocents across the globe in recent years.
Countless scholars of both sexes have rejected the failed Washington Consensus of perpetual war for perpetual peace that dominates the thinking of political leaders from both parties.
Writers like Terpstra, Luciana Bohne, Camille Paglia, Michel Chossudovsky, Paul Craig Roberts, Andrew Bacevich, Pepe Escobar, Phil Giraldi, and many others have inked articles describing the disastrous results from the “hollow hegemons” of both sexes. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/13/the-great-leap-backward-americas-illegal-wars-on-the-world/
By choosing to condemn Trump for his willingness to avoid the mistakes of her neocon and neoliberal colleagues, Clinton is again demonstrating how blind she is to the political revolution that has seen The Donald and Bernie do so well in their respective primaries. http://revolutionradio.org/?p=132614
It is exactly such a departure from those failed policies that many are hoping for. And it is left to the erratic Mr. Trump to be the voice of the disaffected who want an end to these foreign adventures since Sanders continually avoids
discussing this topic.
By calling Putin the next Hitler and by supporting the irrational Obama
policies of confrontation with Russia and China, Clinton is showing us
what she probably said during those suspicious Wall Street speeches
Sanders demanded she reveal.
Support the military industrial complex; back banker bail-outs; justify
interventions everywhere like in Ukraine, Libya, Syria, Honduras and
Yemen; fast-track those sovereignty destroying “free” trade deals that
benefit the few at the expense of the broader public; listen to her mentor
Henry Kissinger rather than the pundits who have shown that the neocon
way fails: you can bet that is a good summary of her high-priced talks to
the boys at Goldman Sachs.
Rather than Trump being the “fascist” that the left portrays as the greater danger to America, it is Hillary Clinton who poses the real threat as she leads the way for the New World Order. http://patriotrising.com/2016/06/02/will-november-us-presidential-election-bring-end-world/
Webster Tarpley has become obsessed with Trump rather than Hillary while Sanders also makes the New York businessman out to be more dangerous than his rival.
Yet it is her proven record of incompetence, failure, outright corruption
and pimping for the globalists that should leave all careful observers unwilling to say yes to her presidential ambitions that are so exemplary of what I have labeled her Napoleon Complex.
And as Roberts concludes in the essay above: “no matter what you
think of Trump, if you vote for Hillary, you are definitely voting for the
end of the world!” https://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=37339
http://www.globalresearch.ca/anglo-america-regression-and-reversion-in-the-modern-world/5528214