SOTN Editor’s Note:
Donald Trump is absolutely right when he says that women should be held legally accountable for killing their unborn babies. Why is there any question about this type of crime also known as fetal homicide or murder in the first degree?!
The graphic shown below is entirely true. If you kill a pregnant woman, the official charge will always be MURDER. However, it the doctor kills a fetus in the womb, it is called a state-sanctioned abortion. Such are the word merchant lawyers and sophist-practitioner attorneys that they have been able to call premeditated murder an abortion.
How have they gotten away with this form of ‘legalized’ killing for so many decades? They very stealthily framed the whole debate within the context of a “woman’s right to choose”. That’s how they did it. They preyed on the woman’s manufactured right to decide what to do with her body, irrespective of the fetus’s right to life. This manufactured ‘right’ was then transformed into a burning desire by abortion industry branding and advertising. In so doing, organizations like the serial criminal Planned Parenthood were literally set up to facilitate a crime spree that continues unabated to this very day.
*Republican Debaters Rip Planned Parenthood For Taxpayer-Funded Criminal Activity
*Former AG Who Filed Criminal Charges Against Planned Parenthood Seeks Justice
*Planned Parenthood Hacked Themselves To Deflect The Gathering Storm
The legal strategy that went into this multi-decade conspiracy to legislate state-funded murder is so complex and convoluted, it is literally impossible for most to believe. That’s how they (abortionists) have gotten away with stone-cold bloody murder in abortion clinics throughout the USA.
Trump is right, and they know it
What The Donald has just done is inserted the unspeakable truth into this public discourse. He has identified the indisputable legal fact that any woman who has an illegal abortion is guilty of murder. The physician abortionist is merely an accomplice to the capital crime committed against a defenseless fetus, and guilty nonetheless. Without the woman presenting her womb for the murder, the abortion could not take place; hence, she might even be more responsible — technically and morally — than the abortionist for the crime. We will leave that one for the medical ethicists.
Now, what The Donald has done is to bring this particular aspect of these ongoing capital crime into much sharper relief. In his inimitable way, he has blurted out the truth during prime time, and guess what, the MSM persecuted him mercilessly for simply telling one of the most inconvenient truths that can ever be uttered in the thoroughly depraved American society, also known as the Obamanation.
For those who are uninitiated in this realm of state-sponsored, corporate-driven murder of the unborn, the following article lays bare exactly what has, and is, going on here. If the American people really understood the profound and far-reaching ramifications of this institutional, taxpayer-funded criminal enterprise, they would appreciate the extremely dangerous position that the nation now finds itself in. The following link well explains the back story to how these career criminals have perpetrated the Abortion Genocide in broad daylight.
What The Donald has done is truly courageous. He has spoken the truth about this highly consequential matter and will now never hear the end of it. The article posted below further elaborates.
State of the Nation
March 31, 2016
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All Hell Breaks Loose After Trump Says Women Should Be “Punished” For Illegal Abortions
ZeroHedge.com
Just yesterday, we discussed Donald Trump’s “women problems.”
Although one might fairly question the methodology behind the polls and whether the questions were designed to elicit a certain type of response, it is worth noting that in three separate surveys (NBC, WSJ, and CNN), Trump’s favorability rating with female voters was 27% or less.
Even if one assumes that the polls were inherently biased, there’s probably some truth to the contention that the things Trump has said about women in the past haven’t done anything to help him when it comes to garnering a large percentage of the female vote and may indeed come back to haunt him in a national contest with Hillary Clinton.
Well on Wednesday, in an MSNBC town hall event, Trump was cornered by host Chris Matthews who asked the GOP frontrunner about his position on illegalabortion.
Below, you can find the highlights as compiled by Bloomberg.
- Host Chris Matthews presses Trump on anti-abortion position, repeatedly asking him, “Should abortion be punished? This is not something you can dodge”
- “Look, people in certain parts of the Republican Party, conservative Republicans, would say, ‘Yes, it should,’” Trump answers
- “How about you?” Matthews asks
- “I would say it’s a very serious problem and it’s a problem we have to decide on. Are you going to send them to jail?” Trump says
- “I’m asking you,” Matthews says
- “I am pro-life,” Trump says
- “How do you actually ban abortion?” Matthews asks
- “Well, you go back to a position like they had where they would perhaps go to illegal places but we have to ban it,” Trump says
- Matthews then presses Trump on if he believes there should be punishment for abortion if it were illegal
- “There has to be some form of punishment,” Trump says
- “For the woman?” Matthews says; “Yeah,” Trump says, nodding
- Trump says punishment would “have to be determined”
- “They’ve set the law and frankly the judges, you’re going to have a very big election coming up for that reason because you have judges where it’s a real tipping point and with the loss of Scalia, who was a very strong conservative, this presidential election is going to be very important,” Trump says
- “When you say what’s the law, nobody knows what the law is going to be. It depends on who gets elected,” Trump says
Obviously, this was “gotcha” journalism on Matthews’ part (once he established that he was referring to illegal abortions he knew he could pin Trump between having to either say women should be punished or that women could break the law with impunity), and as we saw last year with the whole Kurds/Quds Hugh Hewitt debacle, Trump is susceptible to badgering. The other problem here is that it isn’t clear that Trump truly believes some of the things he’s forced to say as a Republican candidate, which leads to exchanges like that recounted above. “Don’t overthink it: Trump doesn’t understand the pro-life position because he’s not pro-life,” a Cruz aid tweeted. Here’s Politico with a bit of context:
Trump’s policy idea is a departure from most state abortion restrictions, which don’t impose penalties on the women who get abortions. Typically, any penalties are imposed on the physician who does the procedure.
The anti-abortion movement in recent decades has shied away from the perception that it is “punishing” women for getting abortions. Instead, it has focused on penalties for the physicians who provide them, such as imposing medical or legal restrictions on their practice. In some rare situations, women have faced charges associated with abortions they have attempted on their own.
Having realized this had become a PR fiasco, Trump promptly walked back his comments.
This is a statement released just moments ago, in which the billionaire revises his statement, calling the women “victims”, and stating it is doctors who should be held legally responsible for performing the illegal act:
If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be legally responsible, not the woman. The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed – like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions.
But by the time the Trump campaign released that statement it was far too late. The media, women’s rights groups, pro-abortion groups, as well as all of Trump’s political opponents smelled blood.
“The last person women need to police their health care decisions is someone who sees them not as people, but as ‘fat pigs,’ ‘bimbos’ and ‘disgusting animals,’” Marcy Stech, a spokeswoman for Emily’s List, a pro-abortion-rights group said.
Here’s the reaction from March for Life:
http://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/715273263501410306/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
And from Bernie Sanders:
Your Republican frontrunner, ladies and gentlemen. Shameful. https://t.co/y49Z8YfRgV
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) March 30, 2016
And here’s the Cruz campaign calling Trump a “charlatan”:
Cruz campaign chair: Trump's abortion comments show he is a "charlatan" https://t.co/6OZtrfIwim https://t.co/EWAbGTx4W2
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) March 30, 2016
Expect this soundbite to play on a loop should Trump end up squaring off against Clinton this fall. Speaking of whom:
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse. Horrific and telling. -H https://t.co/Qi8TutsOw9
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) March 30, 2016