Something is not quite right with Podesta’s eagerness to fling open the floodgates on ‘UFO truth’
SOTN Eitor’s Note:
From our seat the whole UFO and ET phenomenon has great merit, but not when so-called disclosure is being pushed by the government.
In other words we all know that they’re out there. And that EBEs have been visiting Planet Earth since time immemorial. No one can dismiss the massive amount of evidence that proves the existence of ancient aliens. Their tremendous influence and considerable impact on human civilization is now generally accepted in many scientific circles.
Which brings us to the NWO’s point man for UFO disclosure. For some reason John Podesta was chosen long ago to fulfill this role. Not only is he is a politico of the first order, he is also Chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Enough said!
What does Podesta or Clinton have to gain from such disclosures about the reality of UFOs and the truth about extraterrestrial beings. All the U.S. Federal Government has done for decades is relentlessly manipulate the whole issue. Actually the government has not only engineered many of the UFO events by using their own futuristic spacecraft, they have quite purposefully staged human abductions and let the blame fall on the ‘alien invaders’. As the following exposé points out, the G-men are in fact the true body snatchers.
There Are No Alien Abductions, Only Government Kidnappings
Now that’s not to say that Podesta isn’t being used by the Universe to push the whole UFO thing out into the open. Clearly, he is being directed to incrementally bring light to this festering and highly charged issue. Therefore, the real question ought to be: What is their real agenda now that they have used fake alien abductions over so many years to advance their social engineering schemes.
Stated another way, what exactly is Podesta’s goal, who is he really working for, and what kind of truth would Hillary Clinton ever tell about anything?!
N.B. The article posted below greatly accentuates the political aspects of this very suspicious UFO disclosure initiative. It really makes no sense at all … unless they’re up to something no good.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pushing for a game change
by
Seriously, man, what does John Podesta know about the national character that we don’t?
The Clinton machine has opened a massive lead over Bernie Sanders and is steamrolling toward the Democratic nomination. No reason to go off-topic, no reason to tweak the game plan, and certainly no reason to give political adversaries additional targets, not with the Justice Department and the FBI poring over Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails in search of illegalities. This is when you coast on autopilot and stick with the talking points.
“I’ve come into my fair share of people raising questions about whether I’m off my rocker but I’ve been a long-time advocate of declassification of records” — John Podesta/CREDIT: rawstory.com
And yet, this week, HRC’s campaign manager went and did it again. Little green men, space aliens, beam me up – Podesta didn’t say any of those things but that’s the funhouse door he opened when he went on record, once more, about bringing transparency to federal UFO records. He gave the interview to KLAS-TV in Las Vegas, where George Knapp is the only investigative mainstream broadcast reporter in America who’s got their *#@! together when it comes to covering The Great Taboo. And Podesta took responsibility/blame for the remarks Clinton made in December about wanting to “get to the bottom” of the UFO mystery
“I think I’ve convinced her,” Podesta said in an interview that aired Tuesday, “that we need an effort to kind of go look at that and to declassify as much as we can so that more people can have their legitimate questions answered. And more attention and more discussion about unexplained aerial phenomena can happen without people who are in public life, who are serious about this, being ridiculed.”
Podesta’s UFO offensive is so unprecedented and counterintuitive that De Void can’t even come up with an analogy. There’s no demographic constituency here, no political capital, certainly no way to monetize this elephant in the room. The only parallel that comes to mind is hypothetical, like if, say, Walter Mondale had campaigned for legalized weed in 1984 against Mr. Morning in America. But even weed had a libertarian constituency during the notorious prison-swelling Just Say No era. And the last time De Void bothered to look, the free-marketplace-of-ideas Cato Institute ran like a firehosed monkey when confronted with the prospect of treating UFOs as a legitimate political issue.
The dialogue Podesta advocates is so revolutionary, in fact, its realization might even challenge the anthropocentric conceits we use to define ourselves. In the groundbreaking 2008 Political Theory journal essay “Sovereignty and the UFO,” Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall argue that such a sober reassessment could prove more subversive than anyone predicts.
“The ontological threat is that even if the ETs were benign, their confirmed presence would create tremendous pressure for a unified human response, or world government,” they write. “The sovereign identity of the modern state is partly constituted in and through its difference from other such states, which gives modern sovereignty its plural character. Any exteriority that required subsuming this difference into a global sovereignty would threaten what the modern state is, quite apart from the risk of physical destruction.”
Well now, there’s an image. And a remote one, at this point. On the other hand, maybe Podesta understands more about our capacity to manage new ideas than we’ve been allowed to demonstrate. Maybe smearing someone as a “UFO believer” doesn’t reap the same dividends it used to; curiously, no one has tried to weaponize Podesta’s agenda against HRC. At least, not yet. Which is weird, because that’s the obvious play here. Maybe the GOP is too busy fussing over the size of Donald Trump’s schlong to unleash the Little Green Men noise right now.
Either way, a veteran political strategist has given the press a license to ask questions without fear of stigma. But whether the media has the smarts for it – that’s like giving a cigarette lighter to a 7-year-old and telling him to act responsibly.
Be Sociable, Share!