‘The Fix Is In’: Judge Jeanine Says Obama Is Complicit in Hillary Email Scandal
FOX News
Hillary Clinton’s utter confidence that she will not be indicted in her private email server scandal suggests that President Obama and his Justice Department are complicit, Judge Jeanine said in her opening statement last night.
“He was aware of her private email server and actually communicated with her on it,” Judge Jeanine stated.
She pointed out that within 24 hours of Clinton saying she was absolutely certain no indictment was forthcoming, Obama officially endorsed her.
Why would the president do that? Judge Jeanine wondered, suggesting it might be because Clinton sent Obama 18 emails from her private email address, and he replied to at least two of them.
“Translation: Barack, you knew the one way that I communicated. And if I’m indicted, you will be my first witness, because you knew in real time as secretary of state that I was communicating on a private server. You knew, as did everyone. I dare you.”
“The fix is in, folks. And that’s why.”
Watch Judge Jeanine’s opening statement above and read a full transcript below.
Hillary Clinton broke the law. And she’s positive that there’s absolutely no chance she’ll be indicted, confidently announcing this week that nothing will come of her FBI investigation. She knows for sure she’s going to get away with it. In my opinion here’s why. The president of the United States is complicit. He was aware of her private email server and actually communicated with her on it.
What am I talking about? Here’s Hillary’s response when asked if there was any possibility of an indictment.
Hillary, how do you know? Did you speak to Attorney General Loretta Lynch? Did you speak with any Department of Justice official? We know you didn’t speak with the FBI. We know you refused to speak with the inspector general.
So what makes her so sure? Follow me folks and read the tea leaves.
Within 24 hours of Hillary saying she was absolutely certain she would not be indicted, Barack Obama endorses her for president of the United States. No real surprise, since last year he’s said her actions were careless but innocent. There’s classified and then there’s classified.
Query: the president has repeatedly said there is and will be no political interference in the Clinton criminal investigation, that he doesn’t talk with the AG or the FBI about pending cases. So then, how does he know?
And how did he know 8 months ago that nothing would come of this? Why would he double down this week and endorse someone for president who is under an active federal criminal investigation – the first time ever in the history of the United States?
So if the president is sure and she’s sure, what the hell has the FBI been doing for the last 14 months? Spinning its wheels? Engaging in a charade for the sake of appearances? Wasting taxpayers’ dollars on at least 80 FBI agents? If nothing will come of this, why would the feds give Brian Pagliano – her IT guy– immunity? You only get immunity when you proffer evidence of a crime. Why was the Romanian hacker– who said hacking into Hillary’s emails on her private server was so easy that it was like an open orchid on the internet— extradited here to face further charges? Why are the witnesses being interviewed chronologically in classic law enforcement fashion ending with those closest to the target – Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills – the only others on that unsecured server. Huma being paid by the state dept., the Clinton campaign, a Clinton connected corp and bingo the Clinton Foundation
Look, the federal investigation is still active. The FBI director appointed by Barack Obama is one of the most ethical people in Washington with a ten year term irrespective of who’s president. But the FBI does not have access to and cannot present to a grand jury. They simply investigate and make a referral to the Department of Justice. Once a referral is made justice decides whether to go forward. Obama could simply tell Loretta Lynch– his DOJ appointee who serves at his pleasure–either to not put in the grand jury or make a presentation and then not ask for an indictment. And you’ll never know because if anyone talks about it they violate grand jury secrecy and they go to jail. Now if Loretta Lynch were true to her charge she would’ve sought an independent prosecutor months ago when her boss went on national TV and prejudged a federal criminal investigation as one -quote-“ginned up by politics”-which i imagine wasn’t well received by career hardworking FBI agents.
But the telltale was this week with Hillary’s shot across the bough -without an ounce of humility she says in her ever changing narrative
Translation: Hillary threatens the president.
According to reports there were 18 emails sent by Hillary from her unsecure server to the president of the United States. And the president replied to two of them.
Translation: Barack, you knew the one way that I communicated. And if I’m indicted, you will be my first witness, because you knew in real time as secretary of state that I was communicating on a private server. You knew, as did everyone. I dare you.
Now if any of you are still skeptic, she was not emailing the president about her yoga classes or her wedding dress.
The fix is in, folks. And that’s why.
So you say, judge, how could the fix be in if you say FBI director Comey is such an honorable guy? I say it because there would be a constitutional crisis in this country if an indictment were to happen and Jim Comey– as ethical as he is– respects the United States government too much to let that happen.