False Flag Alert: Weiner and the Baby

By Anonymous Patriots

Before we spend too much time being distracted with yet another obvious false flag, please look carefully at the picture that we were given today.  We were told that Anthony Weiner took this picture while his son was lying in bed with him.

How old do you think this infant is? It is certainly an infant if you look at its small hands under the green blanket and his body size in relationship to the man’s torso.

Here is the problem: Huma Abedin gave birth to a boy, Jordan Zain Weiner, in December 2011. That would make their son 4 years and 8 months old.

Below is a picture of their son over a year ago in 2015 in Paris. Assuming he is a healthy boy, he would have grown a few inches and added a few pounds in over a year.

So what happened? Did Jordan shrink? Or is there another infant in the bed with Anthony?

Or……did someone take this picture and keep it for a rainy day when it could be the perfect spin by the Clinton campaign to distract attention from Hillary’s glaring illnesses and Huma’s obvious connection to Islamic extremism exemplified by her mother’s associations with strict adherents of Islamic Sharia law and the suppression of female rights.  It’s the magician’s trick of getting you to look at the hand that is not doing the prestidigitation.  

But this time, the rabbit in the hat is obviously just a distraction.  Look again and you will see an old text presented as a current one to distract from Huma’s close affairs with Hillary as the skillet gets hotter every day.  Perhaps, since the insensitive Weiner is holding his child as he sexts to his girlfriend, the public will have sympathy for Huma who is up to her ears in accusations of wrongdoing.  Hey, look over here where my evil husband – who I am now going to divorce due to this false flag of a sex text– is being really evil – even more evil than I am.

If the picture is recent, then Anthony is in bed with someone else’s infant son. If the picture was taken when Weiner-Abedin’s son was in infant, then this picture was kept “on file” to be used when it would be a distraction.  

In either case, where is child protective services to investigate this matter?