![\"\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Screen-Shot-2018-01-07-at-9.59.51-AM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nOperation Condor \u2013 How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional\u00a0Crisis\u2026<\/h2>\n
by sundance
\ntheconservativetreehouse.com<\/p>\n
This outline is the story of how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose.\u00a0 This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history.\u00a0 This outline is also the story of how one man\u2019s action likely saved our constitutional republic.<\/p>\n
His name is Admiral Mike Rogers.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration \u201cOperation Condor\u201d.\u00a0 Those of you familiar with the film \u201cThree Days of The Condor<\/a>\u201d will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of \u201cCondor\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cSCIF\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 a\u00a0Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility<\/em>. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word\u00a0\u201ccompartmented\u201d<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Intelligence information is housed by compartments within the larger intelligence community network. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment and task. The FBI Counterintelligence unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.<\/p>\n This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is \u2013 to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.<\/p>\n In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.<\/p>\n It is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool. The DNI is a political appointment, a cabinet member, of the President.\u00a0 If the executive branch, the President, wanted to weaponize intelligence as a political tool, he\/she would have control over such weaponization as an outcome of their political appointees within the: FBI (Comey, McCabe), DOJ (Lynch\/Yates), CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), or DoD (Ash Carter), etc.<\/p>\n The civilian (representative) oversight into the compartmented intelligence falls to a very select group known as the\u00a0Intelligence Gang of Eight<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Four Democrats and Four Republicans (four minority party and four majority party political leaders) for a total of eight. Four from the House and Four from the Senate. \u2013Understand the Gang of Eight Here<\/a>\u2013 The Gang-of-Eight can, if they choose, interact with the intelligence product with the same level of security clearance as the compartment being reviewed.<\/p>\n Only these eight members can interact with the intelligence product in this way. This ensures their ability to conduct oversight.<\/p>\n It is critical to understand the difference between the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Gang of Eight. Only two members from the House Intelligence Committee (chair and minority), and two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee (chair and vice-chair) are participants. The other four are Speaker of the House, minority leader of House, Leader of Senate and Minority leader of Senate. The latter four are not part of any other intel committee.<\/p>\n On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.<\/p>\n FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.*<\/p>\n I cannot emphasize this enough.\u00a0*VERY* important detail<\/strong>. Again, notice how Comey doesn\u2019t use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH \u201cBill\u201d Priestap\u2019s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n