The trove of documents, which includes sensitive emails to and from Trump son-in-law and top advisor Jared Kushner, comprise 12 email accounts – one of which reportedly contains around 7,000 emails. Mueller’s team has reportedly been using the emails as the basis for witness interviews, sources tell\u00a0Axios<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n The transition emails are said to include sensitive exchanges on matters that include potential appointments, gossip about the views of particular senators involved in the confirmation process, speculation about vulnerabilities of Trump nominees, strategizing about press statements, and policy planning on everything from war to taxes<\/strong>. –Axios<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cMueller is using the emails to confirm things, and get new leads<\/strong>,\u201d a transition source adds.<\/p>\n Transition officials had reportedly pre-sorted emails in anticipation of Mueller’s investigation, separating “privileged” communications from the rest of the cache, and sources\u00a0say they were surprised to learn of Mueller’s use of the emails – as they have been fully cooperative with the special counsel investigation.\u00a0\u201cThey ask us to waive NDAs [nondisclosure agreements] and things like that<\/strong>,\u201d a second source said. \u201cWe have never said \u2018no\u2019 to anything.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n Tranistion team lawyer Kory Langhofer says the Special Counsel obtained the documents through\u00a0“unlawful conduct”<\/strong>\u00a0by the General Services Administration, reports\u00a0Fox News<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n In a letter obtained by Fox News and sent to House and Senate committees on Saturday,\u00a0the transition team\u2019s attorney alleges \u201cunlawful conduct\u201d by the career staff at the General Services Administration in handing over transition documents to the special counsel\u2019s office<\/strong>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Kory Langhofer, the counsel to Trump for America, wrote in the letter that the special counsel\u2019s office is aware that the GSA \u201cdid not own or control the records in question.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n But, Langhofer says, Mueller\u2019s team has \u201cextensively used the materials in question, including portions that are susceptible to claims of privilege.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Trump transition team lawyer argued the actions \u201cimpair the ability of future presidential transition teams to candidly discuss policy and internal matters that benefit the country as a whole.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The emails could shed light on the details leading up to former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s communications with Rusian ambassador Sergey Kislyak – with whom Flynn had several call to discuss sanctions, as well as an upcoming UN Security Council vote on whether or not to condemn Israel’s building of settlements, which the Obama administration was preparing to allow to go through. The\u00a0New York Times<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>reported in early December that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel asked the Trump transition team to lobby other countries to help Israel.<\/p>\n According to prosecutors, on Dec. 22, Mr. Flynn discussed with Mr. Kislyak an upcoming United Nations Security Council vote on\u00a0whether to condemn Israel\u2019s building of settlements<\/strong>. At the time, the\u00a0Obama administration was preparing to allow a Security Council vote on the matter<\/strong>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Investigators have learned that\u00a0Mr. Flynn and Mr. Kushner took the lead in those efforts<\/strong>.\u00a0Mr. Mueller\u2019s team has emails that show Mr. Flynn saying he would work to kill the vote<\/strong>, the people briefed on the matter said. –NYT<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n In September,\u00a0Politico<\/a><\/em>\u00a0reported that\u00a0Jared Kushner continued to use a private email account that had been set up during the transition to communicate with fellow administration officials during Trump\u2019s first nine months in office –\u00a0<\/strong>however it was used to send\u00a0“less than 100 emails”\u00a0<\/em>which mostly consisted of “quips about news items and minor commentary.<\/em>”<\/p>\n \u201cMr. Kushner uses his White House email address to conduct White House business,\u201d Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for Kushner, said in a statement Sunday. \u201cFewer than 100 emails from January through August were either sent to or returned by Mr. Kushner to colleagues in the White House from his personal email account. These usually forwarded news articles or political commentary and most often occurred when someone initiated the exchange by sending an email to his personal rather than his White House address.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Politico<\/em>\u00a0also noted that Kushner\u2019s use of a private email account was\u00a0part of a larger pattern of Trump administration aides using personal email accounts for government business<\/strong>. Kushner allegedly used the private account to communicate with\u00a0Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Gary Cohn and Josh Raffel<\/strong>. Buried deep within the report, however, that that\u00a0There is no indication that Kushner has shared any sensitive or classified material on his private account<\/strong>, or that he relies on his private email account more than his official White House account to conduct government business.\u00a0Aides say he prefers to call or text over using email<\/strong>.<\/p>\n As ZeroHedge reported at the time,\u00a0Politico<\/a><\/em>\u00a0said\u00a0Kushner and Ivanka Trump set up their private family domain late last year before moving to Washington from New York,<\/strong>\u00a0according to people with knowledge of events as well as publicly available internet registration records. At the time, Kushner, who served as a senior campaign adviser, was expected to be named to a White House role, while Ivanka Trump was publicly saying she didn\u2019t plan to work in her father\u2019s administration, though she ended up taking an unpaid role with an office in the West Wing.\u00a0People familiar with the account say it was primarily set up for personal use, but that Kushner has used it to communicate with acquaintances outside the White House about matters relating to Trump and the administration,<\/strong>\u00a0according to people who have received messages.<\/p>\n In November, the Senate Judiciary Committee said Kushner\u00a0failed to turn over relevant documents<\/strong>\u00a0pertaining to a “Russian backdoor overture and dinner invite” as well as emails received from WikiLeaks. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) wrote in a letter to Kushner’s attorney, Abbe Lowell: “We appreciate your voluntary cooperation with the Committee\u2019s investigation, but the production appears to have been incomplete<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n According to leaked information,\u00a0Kushner allegedly neglected to disclose<\/a>\u00a0that Aleksander Torshin, a powerful Russian central banker and former senator with ties to both President Vladimir Putin and Russian organized crime, had reached out to the campaign with a “dinner invite” and an offer to connect Trump with Putin. Kushner, who was on the email chain, reportedly instructed junior campaign aides to rebuff the meeting. As reported by\u00a0NBC<\/em>, “Kushner rebuffed the request after receiving a lengthy email exchange about it<\/strong>\u00a0between a West Virginia man and Trump campaign aide Rick Dearborn, the sources said.”<\/p>\n Grassley and Feinstein’s letter point to several omissions, and addresses concerns raised by Kushner’s attorney over “Executive Privilege” by creating a “privilege log” to segregate communications.<\/p>\n \u201cIf, as you suggest, Mr. Kushner was unaware of, for example, any attempts at Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, then presumably there would be few communications concerning many of the persons identified<\/strong>,\u201d the letter reads, asking Kushner to turn over all responsive documents by Nov 27. As\u00a0Politico<\/em>\u00a0reported at the time:<\/p>\n According to the lawmakers, Kushner\u2019s attorney suggested providing some documents might \u201cimplicate the president\u2019s Executive Privilege.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>In their letter,\u00a0they asked Lowell to resolve those issues and produce the documents or create a \u201cprivilege log\u201d to detail over which documents the president is asserting executive privilege.<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Grassley and Feinstein also said Kushner declined to produce documents connected to his security clearance application, citing their confidentiality. The lawmakers said they intend to take Lowell up on a separate request to visit his office to review the documents in person, but they said the committee would not waive its request to obtain its own copies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Lowell responded, stating that they had “provided the Judiciary Committee with all relevant documents that had to do with Mr. Kushner’s calls, contacts or meetings with Russians during the campaign and transition, which was the request,” adding that Kushner had told the committee they would be open to additional requests for information.<\/p>\n\n
![](\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/user5\/imageroot\/2017\/12\/13\/GettyImages_170854342.0.jpg\")
<\/a>
\nFBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller III<\/em><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
![](\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/user5\/imageroot\/2017\/12\/13\/jariv_0.PNG\")
<\/a>
\nIvanka Trump and Jared Kushner<\/em><\/p>\n\n