![\"\"](\"http:\/\/willyloman.files.wordpress.com\/2017\/10\/presser-1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nIf you know anything about reading body language you can tell Rouse\u2019s presence is making the sheriff uneasy and when you hear Rouse speak later, you understand why. He comes across as a slick, processed thug, much like most DHS agents\u2026 or most politicians from places like New Jersey.<\/p>\n
Leaving Lombardo\u2019s demeanor aside for a few minutes, there were some rather interesting comments he made last night that are worthy of noting.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we know is Stephen Paddock is a man who spent decades acquiring weapons and ammo and living a secret life. Much of which will never be fully understood\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
When asked to elaborate on this later, all the sheriff could say about that statement was that Stephen had no internet footprint to speak of and that, according to the investigators, is suspicious in and of itself. Hence his \u201csecret life\u201d<\/p>\n
That\u2019s not suspicious folks. Many people keep a very low profile on the internet. That doesn\u2019t mean they have nefarious plans. Not everyone wants to be an internet superstar with selfies and endless videos about their mundane, pointless, meaningless minutia-centered lives plastered all over Youtube and Instagram. Some people, believe it or not, are happy living in the real world\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2026 especially people 64-years-old and especially 64-year-old multi-millionaires who seem to prefer keeping their names and faces off of the gossip pages of the local Vegas tabloids.<\/p>\n
So there is nothing nefarious about that at all and yet Lombardo tosses it out there as if it\u2019s some kind of clue. Might remind some of you of the statements made back after the illegal invasion of Iraq when we were supposedly looking for the WMDs and finding none and a bunch of neocons would come out and tell the complicit media \u201cnot finding the weapons is a clue itself isn\u2019t it?\u201d as if that proved Saddam had hidden the weapons and therefore he was guilty as charged.<\/p>\n
We are truly in trouble when the lack of corroborating evidence becomes corroborating evidence itself.<\/p>\n
Also of note in that statement is the notion that we may never \u201cfully understand\u201d what happened here. That\u2019s a meme that\u2019s already been landed upon by several complicit media outlets this morning. We are already being primed for the inevitable conclusion that officially, there will never be a motive assigned to this event.<\/p>\n
The MSM is also already parroting the BS about his prescription medication, as was evidenced last night by Tucker Carlson when he tried to suggest that might have had something to do with this event. We have seen that bit of disinfo being pushed by various cognitive infiltrators in the past during investigations into previous American Gladio events.<\/p>\n
Lombardo released yet another timeline last night. This one slightly different than\u00a0the one this website reported on yesterday<\/a>.<\/p>\n
It is in the sheriff\u2019s discussion of this new timeline that I found one of the most enlightening statements released by the authorities to date.<\/p>\n
First of all, they set the first shot now at 10:05pm Sunday night, moving it back from 10:08pm. Three minutes might not seem like a big change, but in fact it is.<\/p>\n
We are supposed to assume it took a total of 3 minutes for the first 9\/11 call to be received by authorities in Las Vegas. That\u2019s a long time.<\/p>\n
Stop reading. Set your timer on your cell phone. Push start. And wait three minutes before continuing. It\u2019s a long time folks.<\/p>\n
Plus, think about this. The shots supposedly came from the hotel and you can clearly hear in the cabbie video that some of them certainly did come from that location\u2026 somewhere. Ask yourself why the Mandalay Bay hotel\u2019s security didn\u2019t immediately notify local police when they heard shot fired from their hotel. You would think that would be the first thing they would do. But according to the new police story, a full three minutes passed before the first 9\/11 call came in. And that seems very odd by itself but that\u2019s not what I am getting at here.<\/p>\n
Another discrepancy in the timeline involves just how many officers met up with hotel security members and went to the 32nd floor.<\/p>\n
In the\u00a0first version the official report<\/a>\u00a0FROM LOMBARDO HIMSELF was that 6 officers met up with the security team and went to the 32nd floor. Now, it seems, only two were there.<\/p>\n
Yesterday\u2019s version<\/p>\n
10:14pm \u2013<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cSome officers took it upon themselves to immediately go to the Mandalay Bay,\u201d Lombardo said. \u201cThere was\u00a0a team of six officers<\/em>\u00a0that approached security<\/strong>. They went up the elevators after discussing the situation with security and obtaining intelligence. They checked each floor, until they located were where they believed to be the room.\u00a0Subsequently they approached the room,\u00a0received gunfire, they backed off<\/em>\u00a0and SWAT responded<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n
New Version<\/p>\n
10:17pm<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 \u201cThe first two officers arrive on the 32nd floor<\/strong>\u201c<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This might not seem like a big difference but it is. How can you not know 48 hours into an investigation how many officers made first contact with the suspect of a mass shooting event? If the story had gone from 6 to 5 maybe I can understand the \u201cfog of war\u201d concept\u2026 but from 6 to 2?<\/p>\n
Also of note, pay attention to this change:<\/p>\n
Yesterday\u2019s version<\/p>\n
10:24 p.m.<\/strong>\u00a0Up on the 32nd floor,\u00a0police and security officers<\/em>\u00a0are closing in on room 135. An officer calls for a SWAT team\u00a0after the gunman shot through his door and wounded a hotel security guard<\/em>\u00a0who accompanied the officers<\/strong>. \u201cWe have a security officer shot in the leg on 32 floor,\u201d an officer says.\u00a0\u201cHe shot down the hallway and hit a security guard.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n
New version<\/p>\n
10:18pm<\/strong>\u00a0Security officer\u00a0tells<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0the LVMPD officers he was shot and gives them the exact location of the suspect\u2019s room<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
In yesterday\u2019s version, 6 officers were with the security officer when he was shot as THEY were making their way to the door. Today the security man TOLD the 2 officers he had been shot when they got up there.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s a big difference folks.<\/p>\n
Later in the press conference, Sheriff Lombardo was asked how many rounds the LVMPD fired back at the suspect as he supposedly shot at them down the hallway of the 32nd floor. Lombardo said \u201cnone\u201d<\/p>\n
No fire fight. So it appears all the shooting down the hall took place before LVMPD got up there.<\/p>\n
Lombardo goes through the trouble of explaining how it took a minute for the TWO officers to meet the security guard and be told he had ALREADY BEEN SHOT. But of course, in the first version, they were on that floor for quite sometime before reporting the security guard had been hit.<\/p>\n
Another thing brought up in this new timeline was the fact the last shots fired by the suspect(s?) in the room was at 10:15pm. Now we get back to the important starting time of this attack. Three minutes, again, is a long time folks. Especially when you are counting rounds fired. If the shooting started at 10:05 and ended at 10:15, that\u2019s 10 minutes at so many rounds per minute. But if it started at 10:08pm, well, that\u2019s only 7 minutes which ups the rounds per minute count considerably.<\/p>\n
Now look at this:<\/p>\n
Yesterday\u2019s version<\/p>\n