![\"\"](\"http:\/\/themillenniumreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Screen-Shot-2017-09-01-at-7.11.35-PM.png\")
<\/a>Francine Wheeler, the Newtown mom who begged for gun control after Sandy Hook.<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n
Jim Fetzer<\/a><\/p>\n In a previous study about Sandy Hook, “New Angle on Sandy Hook Shooting Hoax”<\/a>, Carl Herman observed that the average age of the 20 women who purport to be parents of the purported child victims at Sandy Hook was 36 years of age at giving birth, which is 10 years older than the average of 26 across the nation. He calculated the improbability of that occurring by chance at 109.4 quadrillion to one! In other words, their children ought to be about 10 years older.<\/i><\/p>\n In order to present the most accurate and scientific studies of Sandy Hook, we are responsive to communications from other students of this elaborate scam, including some who have arrived at different results in calculating the improbability of the mothers’ ages. Paul Majchrowicz, for example, arrived at a different estimate–which is documented below–that it is 812,043,102 more likely that the children were born in 1996 than in 2006, as the official account maintains.<\/i><\/p>\n That, of course, remains a very substantial improbability and strongly supports the inference that something is wrong. <\/i>Why does it matter? Because from the beginning, the photos of the children looked as though they were wearing clothing that was about 10 years out of date. <\/i>And we had other grounds for suspecting that the children were fictional characters created out of photographs of other children when they were younger. Here an image from a video illustrating the point<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/a><\/div>\n