![\"\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/SIDS-KellyBroganMD.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nWritten with\u00a0Sayer Ji<\/a>,\u00a0GreenMedInfo.com<\/a>\u00a0founder.<\/p>\n A new study published in Current Medicine and Chemistry titled, \u201cSudden infant death following hexavalent vaccination: a neuropathologic study<\/a>,\u201d lends support for the long theorized link between an ever-expanding number of infant vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n The fact that the peak age for SIDS is 2\u20134 months, which coincides with the introduction of 11 shots containing 16 vaccines (within the US immunization schedule), is so obvious a cause for concern, that even the\u00a0CDC has been compelled to address<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0the seeming \u2018coincidence\u2019 directly:<\/p>\n \u201cFrom 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The timing of these two events has led some people to believe they might be related\u2026<\/strong><\/em>With babies receiving multiple doses of vaccines during their first year of life and SIDS being the leading cause of death in babies between one month and one year of age, CDC has led research studies to look for possible linkage.\u201d<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Unsurprisingly, the CDC, whose pro-vaccine agenda is glaringly oblivious to the 100+ documented serious, unintended\u00a0adverse effects of vaccines<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0as evidenced in the biomedical literature, claims extensive research they commissioned has found vaccines do not cause SIDS. Despite the CDC\u2019s dismissal, infant mortality rates are highest among countries that administer the most vaccines within the most vulnerable developmental window of infanthood.\u00a0A 2011 study<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0published in Human & Experimental Toxicology, for instance, observed that \u201cThe US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year\u2014the most in the world\u2014yet 33 nations have lower IMRs [infant mortality rates].\u201d They found that across the 34 nations analyzed \u201ca high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with\u00a0r<\/em>\u00a0= 0.992 (p<\/em>\u00a0= 0.0009).\u201d<\/p>\n Also, a recent study published in\u00a0Vaccine<\/em>\u00a0titled, \u201cCo-administration of live measles and yellow fever\u00a0vaccines\u00a0and inactivated pentavalent\u00a0vaccines\u00a0is associated with\u00a0increased\u00a0mortality\u00a0compared with measles and yellow fever\u00a0vaccines\u00a0only\u201d found\u00a0multiple infant vaccines dramatically increased the risk of mortality<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0in a trial conducted in the West African country of Guinea-Bissau.<\/p>\n While the 6-antigen hexavalent vaccine most recently linked to SIDS is presently only licensed in Europe, there are a number of \u2018mandatory\u2019 multi-dose vaccines in the US immunization schedule \u2014 including (DTaP, MMR), and which brings up the question: are the risks for adverse reactions \u2013 including lethal ones \u2014 amplified in multi-dose vaccines in comparison to single dose forms?<\/p>\n There are also a wide range of vaccines in development or already on the market, which are being included or will be included eventually on top of an ever-expanding immunization schedule:<\/p>\n a) Pentacel (DTaP, ActHIB & IPV),<\/p>\n b) Comvax (Hep B & PedvaxHIB),<\/p>\n c) Pediarix (DTaP, IPV, & Hep B),<\/p>\n d) ProQuad (MMR-Varicella),<\/p>\n e) ActHIB \u2013 HIB & Tetanus Toxoid, or HIB & DaPT,<\/p>\n f) Hiberix (HIB & Tetanus Toxoid),<\/p>\n g) PedvaxHIB (HIB & meningococcal serotype B antigen),<\/p>\n h) Menhibrix (meningococcal grps C & Y, HIB & Tetanus Toxoid)<\/p>\n i) Menactra (meningococcal grps A, C, Y, W-135 & Diphtheria Toxoid)<\/p>\n j) Prevnar-13 (13 strains of streptococcus pneumonia & Diphteria Protein)<\/p>\n Dr. Larry Palevsky, MD<\/a><\/strong>, has pointed out that<\/p>\n \u201cEven if vaccines only purportedly contain 1 bacterial or viral antigen (as in\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>Varicella & Hepatitis A)<\/em><\/strong>, there are multiple antigens inside of them making them multivalent in and of themselves. And, they are most often given at the same time as other vaccines, making these single antigen vaccines into multivalent injections.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n They can consist of bacterial, viral or even yeast antigens, as well as known environmental toxins, proteins, & other contaminant bacteria, viruses, and yeast. By definition, all vaccines, in and of themselves, are\u00a0multivalent.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Despite the fact that the Varicella vaccine contains only 1 reported viral antigen, the injection of this vaccine is still an injection into the body of multiple antigens, i.e., sucrose, hydrolyzed gelatin, sodium chloride, monosodium glutamate (MSG), sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium chloride, and residual components of the MRC-5 cells on which the varicella virus was isolated, including DNA, protein, and trace quantities of monobasic, EDTA, neomycin, and fetal bovine serum.\u00a0http:\/\/www.merck.com\/product\/usa\/pi_circulars\/v\/varivax\/ The injection of the Hepatitis A vaccine, despite only containing 1 reported viral antigen, also contains multiple antigens, i.e., aluminum hydroxide, amino acids, disodium phosphate, mono potassium phosphate, neomycin sulphate, polysorbate-20, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and water.\u00a0http:\/\/www.gsk.ca\/english\/docs-pdf\/product-monographs\/Havrix.pdf.\u00a0<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Here are the known pathogenic ingredients in the vaccine schedule:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n DaPT \u2013 3 bacteria<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n HIB \u2013 1 bacterium<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Prevnar -13 \u2013 13 bacteria<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Menactra \u2013 4 bacteria<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Hepatitis B \u2013 1 virus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Hepatitis A \u2013 1 virus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Polio \u2013 3 viruses<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Influenza \u2013 3 viruses<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n MMR \u2013 3 viruses<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Varicella \u2013 1 virus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Rotavirus \u2013 5 viruses<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Gardisil \u2013 4 viruses<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The Pentacel combination vaccine (DTaP, Polio, HIB), given to children at 2, 4, 6, & 15-18 months contains the ActHIB vaccine (HIB & tetanus), along with a multitude of other bacterial (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) & viral (3 polio) antigens. The Comvax combination vaccine (Hep B + HIB), given to infants 3 times within their first year of life, contains the Hepatitis B viral antigen & Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast antigen, along with the Pedvax HIB vaccine (HIB bacterium + Neisseria meningococcal serotype B bacterial antigen).\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nThe human immune system does not play favorites with injected antigens. In other words, a non-bacterial or non-viral vaccine antigen is responded to equally by the immune system, as any of the bacterial and viral antigens.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/address>\n<\/blockquote>\n Given the number of \u2018antigenic\u2019 exposures in vaccines, singularly, and in multi-dose form, the number of possible immunological reactions in newborns is simply mind-blowing \u2013 especially considering just how little we know about the immune system, the developing brain and infant physiology.<\/p>\n Given the weight of evidence linking infant vaccines to higher mortality, this new paper\u2019s findings should not be of great surprise.<\/p>\n Researchers \u201cexamined a large number of sudden infant death syndrome victims in order to point out a possible causal relationship between a previous hexavalent vaccination and the sudden infant death.\u201d They selected 110 cases for review, finding that in \u201c13 cases (11.8%) the death occurred in temporal association with administration of the hexavalent vaccine (from 1 to 7 days).\u201d None of the victims had congenital developmental alterations of brain structures known to regulate vital functions.\u00a0 While brain abnormalities were noted, and while the researchers stated that their study does not prove a causal relationship between hexavalent vaccines and SIDS, they hypothesized that \u201cvaccine components could have a direct role in sparking off a lethal outcome in vulnerable babies.\u201d They concluded:<\/p>\n \u201c[W]e sustain the need that deaths occurring in a short space of time after hexavalent vaccination are appropriately investigated and submitted to a post-mortem examination particularly of the autonomic nervous system by an expert pathologist to objectively evaluate the possible causative role of the vaccine in SIDS.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n This is by no means the first report in the medical literature linking hexavalent vaccines to SIDS. A\u00a0quick search on pubmed.gov<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0will reveal quite a few others, dating back to an initial 2006 report published in the journal\u00a0Vaccine\u00a0<\/em>titled, \u201cUnexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination<\/a><\/strong>,\u201d concluding after post-mortem autopsies that these were cases of \u201cpossibly fatal complications after application of hexavalent vaccines.\u201d<\/p>\n In 2011, a study was published in\u00a0Statistics in Medicine<\/em>\u00a0titled \u201cA modified self-controlled case series method to examine association between multidose vaccinations and death<\/a><\/strong>,\u201d found that based on the review of 300 unexplained sudden unexpected deaths (uSUD) following either penta- or hexavalent, \u201ca 16-fold risk increase after the 4th dose could be detected with a power of at least 90 per cent,\u201d and \u201cA general 2-fold risk increase after vaccination could be detected with a power of 80 per cent.\u201d<\/p>\n Another 2011 study published in\u00a0PLoS<\/em>\u00a0titled \u201cSudden unexpected deaths and vaccinations during the first two years of life in Italy: a case series study<\/a><\/strong>,\u201d investigated a signal of an association between vaccination in the second year of life with a hexavalent vaccine and sudden unexpected deaths (SUD) in the two day window following vaccination, which was reported in Germany in 2003.\u00a0 The Italian study sought to establish whether hexavalent vaccines increased the short-term risk of SUD in infants. The study analyzed 604 infants who died of SUD, 244 (40%) of whom had received at least one vaccination. Four deaths occurred within two days from vaccination with the hexavalent vaccines, representing a 50% increase in relative risk. The relative risk for SUD for the risk periods 0-7 and 0-14 days were 100% [2.0 RR] and 50% [1.5 RR] higher, respectively. The study concluded that there was a 120% [2.2 RR] increased risk associated with the first dose of hexavalent vaccine.<\/p>\n Clearly, both case studies and broad epidemiological studies confirm the possibility that hexavalent vaccination can be lethal in susceptible individuals.\u00a0 The next important question is what is the mechanism?<\/strong><\/p>\n One of the first studies to offer an explanation was published in 2006 in the international journal of pathology,\u00a0Virchows Archives\u00a0<\/em>titled, \u201cSudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS?<\/a><\/strong>\u201c. The study discussed how previous expert analysis performed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products in 2003, following an investigation they conducted into the emergence of a link between hexavalent vaccines and 5 cases of infant deaths that occurred, paid little attention \u201cto examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in these deaths considered.\u201d\u00a0 The study goes on to report on the autopsy findings of a 3-month old female infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly immediately after the administration of the hexavalent vaccine. The autopsy revealed \u201cThe cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration.\u201d The author hypothesized, \u201c[T]he unexpected death of this vulnerable baby (infant with bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus) could have been triggered by the hexavalent vaccination. This case is consistent with the triple-risk model of SIDS,[1]<\/a>\u00a0a hypothesis comprising an underlying biological vulnerability to exogenous stressors and some triggering factors in a critical developmental period.\u201d<\/p>\n The report concluded:<\/p>\n \u201cThis case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Another case study published in\u00a0Forensic Science International<\/em>\u00a0in 2008 titled, \u201cBeta-tryptase<\/a>and quantitative mast-cell increase in a sudden infant death following hexavalent immunization<\/a><\/strong>,\u201d described a fatal case of a 3-month-old female infant, who died within 24 h of vaccination with hexavalent vaccine from vaccine-induced shock. They concluded:<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026that acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The potential for hexavalent vaccine induced shock has even been acknowledged by the vaccine\u2019s manufacturer. GlaxoSmithKline\u2019s hexavalent vaccine (INFANRIX)\u00a0PDF insert<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>describes post-marketing surveillance data on adverse reactions which include within the section on \u2018Nervous system disorders\u2019 the following side effect: \u201cCollapse or shock-like state (hypotonic-hyporesponsiveness episode).\u201d<\/p>\n The aforementioned information clearly indicates that hexavalent vaccine is a possible cause of infant death mistakenly or intentionally attributed to an idiopathic syndrome \u2013 SIDS \u2013 in order to hide the lethal risks associated with routine immunizations. This leaves parents with the question: could the slippery slope of simultaneous vaccine delivery represent a lethal intervention for my newborn? One that is unlikely to be recognized as such, but for which the literature suggests is a real and present danger? It seems that it may have required the design of\u00a0hexavalent\u00a0<\/em>vaccines to demonstrate the true hubris in reckless injection of immunogenic material into our most vulnerable.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\nvarivax_pi.pdf.<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nHexavalent Vaccine and SIDS: Looking at the Studies<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n