<\/p>\n
by John Solomon and Sara Carter
\nCIRCA<\/p>\n
The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after the retired Army general roiled the bureau\u2019s leadership by intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination, according to documents and interviews.<\/p>\n
Flynn\u2019s intervention on behalf of Supervisory Special Agent Robyn Gritz was highly unusual, and included a letter in 2014 on his official Pentagon stationary, a public interview\u00a0in 2015 supporting Gritz\u2019s case and an offer to testify on her behalf. His offer put him as a hostile witness in a case against McCabe, who was soaring through the bureau\u2019s leadership ranks.<\/p>\n
The FBI sought to block Flynn\u2019s support for the agent, asking a federal administrative law judge in May 2014 to keep Flynn and others from becoming a witness in her Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) case, memos obtained by Circa show. Two years later, the FBI opened its inquiry of Flynn.<\/p>\n
The EEOC case, which is still pending, was serious enough to\u00a0require McCabe to submit to a sworn statement to investigators, the documents show.<\/p>\n
The deputy director\u2019s testimony provided some of the strongest evidence in the case of possible retaliation, because he admitted the FBI opened an internal investigation into Gritz\u2019s personal conduct after learning the agent \u201chad filed or intended to file\u201d a sex discrimination complaint against her supervisors.<\/p>\n
McCabe eventually became the bureau\u2019s No. 2 executive and emerged as a central player in\u00a0the FBI\u2019s Russia election tampering investigation, putting him in a position to impact the criminal inquiry against Flynn.<\/p>\n
Three FBI employees told Circa they personally witnessed McCabe make disparaging remarks about Flynn before and during the time the retired Army general emerged as a figure in the Russia case.<\/p>\n
The bureau employees, who spoke only on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution, said they did not know the reason for McCabe\u2019s displeasure with Flynn, but that it made them uncomfortable as the Russia probe began to unfold and\u00a0pressure built to investigate Flynn. One employee even consulted a private lawyer.<\/p>\n
\u201cAs far as the troops in the field, the vast-majority were disgusted with the Russia decision, but that was McCabe driving the result that eventually led [former FBI Director James] Comey to make the decision,\u201d said a senior federal law enforcement official, with direct knowledge of the investigation.<\/p>\n
FBI agents\u2019 concerns became more pronounced when a highly-classified piece of evidence — an intercepted conversation between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak — suddenly leaked to the news media and prompted Flynn\u2019s resignation as Trump\u2019s top security adviser.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Flynn leaks were nothing short of political,\u201d one FBI employee said, noting the specific contents of the conversation were known by only a handful of government officials when they leaked. \u201cThe leaks appeared to be targeted to take Flynn out.\u201d<\/p>\n
Eventually the probe on Flynn moved beyond Russia to questions about whether he properly disclosed foreign payments\u00a0affecting his security clearance.<\/p>\n
FBI officials declined to answer any questions from Circa, including whether McCabe ever considered recusing himself or has recused himself from the Flynn aspects of the Russia probe. McCabe declined comment via the FBI press office.<\/p>\n
But one of the FBI\u2019s most famous whistleblowers says McCabe has an ethical obligation to recuse himself in the Flynn probe to avoid the appearance of retribution or bias.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don’t think they have any choice. He has to step aside,\u201d said Frederic Whitehurst, who as an FBI special agent and forensic chemist blew the whistle on misdeeds inside the FBI crime lab two decades ago and prompted widespread reforms.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf he stays involved, the case against Flynn has no credibility,\u201d explained Whitehurst, now often called as an expert witness in court cases. \u201cIf there are criminal charges that could go against Flynn, that’s got to go to court. And those agents at some point may be called before a grand jury and anything he (McCabe) said to them about\u00a0Flynn could be used as exonerating information or evidence of misconduct.\u201d<\/p>\n
Whitehurst said he saw senior FBI officials, including then-Director Louis Freeh and then-General Counsel Howard Shapiro, recuse themselves in the 1990s from his whistleblowing case to avoid looking they were involved in retribution after he made allegations of wrongdoing by the bureau<\/p>\n
\u201cLouie and Howie did it, and that sets the precedent I think,\u201d Whitehurst said.<\/p>\n
Documents and memos obtained by Circa detail how Flynn and other top officials at other government agencies in 2014 and 2015 came to intervene in the EEOC case of Gritz, who rose over two decades to a supervisory special agent inside the FBI on the strength of her counterterrorism work.<\/p>\n
For nearly a decade, Gritz worked with the intelligence community to help successfully track down global terrorists or rescue Western hostages, and was even occasionally called upon to personally brief then-Director Robert Mueller on sensitive cases like the disappearance of\u00a0a retired agent Robert Levinson inside Iran, memos show.<\/p>\n
But her career took a sudden downward turn after she went to work under McCabe and his leadership team in 2012, resulting in her first negative rating after years of outstanding performance reviews. She filed an EEOC complain inside the FBI against a handful of bureau executives in 2012, alleging her career was being derailed by sexual discrimination.<\/p>\n
The FBI referred her for an Office of Professional Responsibility investigation for\u00a0timecard irregularities. As hostilities rose between the two sides, emails and testimony showed senior FBI officials castigated Gritz for being too \u201cemotional,\u201d having a possible mental illness and sending inappropriate emails.<\/p>\n
The FBI concluded there was no discrimination, arguing Gritz was referred to OPR for investigation on June 20, 2012 before she ever filed her EEOC complaint.<\/p>\n
But McCabe\u2019s sworn statement offered evidence that actually supported Gritz\u2019s claim of retaliation and discrimination,\u00a0recounting a conversation on June 19, 2012 in which he authorized the OPR investigation of Gritz after one of his deputies told him Gritz was about to file an EEO complaint, his sworn statement shows.<\/p>\n
\u201cI first learned of the issues that led to Ms. Gritz\u2019s current OPR investigation during a telephone call with Deputy Assistant Director (DAD) Jennifer Ley on June 19, 2012,\u201d McCabe testified.<\/p>\n
\u201cI recalled that during the course of our conversation DAD Ley mentioned to me that Ms. Gritz had filed or intended to file an EEO complaint against her immediate\u00a0supervisor.\u201d<\/p>\n
The very next day, the FBI initiated the OPR investigation of Gritz, according to evidence in the FBI\u2019s official personnel files. FBI records support McCabe\u2019s version of events, showing Gritz had contacted FBI EEO officials in mid-June before the OPR probe was initiated, then filed her formal complaint a few weeks later. The FBI \u2018s official report of investigation on Gritz\u2019s EEO complaint, which absolved the FBI of any discrimination, omitted any mention that McCabe had been aware of the EEO\u00a0complaint before the bureau filed its OPR action against Gritz.<\/p>\n
Gritz\u2019s initial complaint in 2012 named the FBI supervisor below McCabe. She chose to resign from the FBI in 2013, her case becoming the poster child for a National Public Radio story on the FBI\u2019s allegedly hostile environment for women agents in 2015.<\/p>\n
In 2014, Gritz amended her EEOC complaint to specifically name McCabe, alleging she suffered \u201ca hostile environment, defamation of character through continued targeting by Andrew McCabe in\u00a0official documents, and continuous patterns and instances of severe and excessive hostile behavior\/attitude toward complainant. These actions have a negative impact on the complainant, professionally, financially, and personally.\u201d<\/p>\n
Flynn\u2019s intervention in the case occurred around the time that McCabe\u2019s name was added to the complaint. Flynn’s first act was to write a letter of support in her case.<\/p>\n
\u201cSSA Gritz was well-known, liked and respected in the military counter-terrorism community for\u00a0her energy, commitment and professional capacity, and over the years worked in several interagency groups on counter-terrorism targeting initiatives,\u201d Flynn wrote May 9, 2014.<\/p>\n
At the time, Flynn was an Army lieutenant general and the chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he put his letter on official agency stationary to be submitted in Gritz\u2019s case.<\/p>\n
As soon as Gritz revealed to the FBI that Flynn and other top federal figures had written letters to support her case and likely would be called as\u00a0witnesses, the bureau dispatched a lawyer to try to block the evidence from being included in the EEO case, documents show.<\/p>\n
The FBI \u201chas reviewed the letters submitted by the Complainant and objects to their inclusion in the record,\u201d the bureau\u2019s lawyer wrote. \u201cThey are selfserving letters, not part of any personnel file nor contemporaneous generated during the period of Ms. Gritz\u2019s employment with the FBI, and which she has unilaterally solicited and obtained. They should be excluded.\u201d<\/p>\n
While the FBI argued Gritz\u2019s had become underperforming, tardy to work, insurbordinate, possibly mentally ill or emotional and deserving of a poor performance review, Flynn argued just the opposite, saying he saw the agent excel while working with the DIA and other intelligence community agencies.<\/p>\n
\u201cHer work consistently made a positive difference,\u201d Flynn wrote. \u201c.Her tenacity and personal commitment consistently produced outstanding results in the most challenging environments.\u201d<\/p>\n
Flynn went further, offering an\u00a0interview in 2015 with NPR in which he called Gritz one of the \u201cbright lights and shining stars\u201d in the intelligence community who \u201cjust kinda got it when it came to the kind of enemy that we were facing and the relationship that was necessary between law enforcement and the military.\u201d<\/p>\n
Flynn wasn\u2019t alone among top officials who came to Gritz\u2019s defense in her battle against the FBI.<\/p>\n
\u201cSSA Gritz was without question, the most energetic, most consistently engaged and prepared and single most\u00a0effective member of this interagency group,\u201d wrote Navy Rear Admiral B. L. Losey, who served both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama as the White House\u2019s National Security Council Director for Combatting Terrorism.<\/p>\n
Losey offered a most poignant endorsement of the female agent. \u201cIf I were taken hostage, I would hope that above all others SSA Robyn Gritz were assigned the task to track and recover me,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley also afforded Gritz support, asking federal authorities to investigate whether her case was emblematic of a hostile workplace for women inside the FBI.<\/p>\n
In a brief interview this weekend, Gritz said she was mortified to think that her request to Flynn to help with her EEOC case in any way\u00a0affected his relationship with the FBI or his current status as someone under investigation in the Russia case.<\/p>\n
\u201cFlynn was the first leader to defend me,\u201d said Gritz. \u201cHe forwarded a letter to the FBI and I personally think that Comey did not receive it. McCabe knew Flynn and I were friends. I felt that from the beginning it was an issue.\u201d<\/p>\n