{"id":65909,"date":"2017-02-13T07:31:04","date_gmt":"2017-02-13T11:31:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=65909"},"modified":"2017-02-13T07:31:04","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T11:31:04","slug":"what-craziness-is-the-ninth-circuit-court-of-appeals-doing-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=65909","title":{"rendered":"What craziness is the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals doing now?!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ninth Circuit Court Now Demands It Be Protected From\u00a0Itself\u2026<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

theconservativetreehouse.com<\/p>\n

Oh, the winning\u2026 it\u2019s often too funny. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now independently, on its own impetus<\/a>, requesting an internal vote on a full panel en banc hearing to review its own decision.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the full ninth are asking the Trump administration to file an additional brief telling the court why the three member original appeals ruling authority was wrong.\u00a0\u00a0 In essence, the smart judges know what wasn\u2019t considered<\/a>, and are now looking for an out.<\/p>\n

You just can\u2019t make this stuff up.<\/p>\n

Prior to expanding the conversation, allow us to set the current stage with a few tweet optics:<\/p>\n

\"9th-circuit-2\"<\/a>\"9th-circuit-3\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Wait, wha\u2026 huh? Yes, that\u2019s the 9th circuit requesting its own judicial membership ruling to be reviewed by the entire larger 9th circuit appeals court panel. Ya think maybe they recognize<\/a> they just jumped head-first into showcasing their own insufferable moonbattery\u2026<\/p>\n

\n

BREAKING: 9th Circuit will be voting on whether to reconsider the 3-judge panel decision en banc. pic.twitter.com\/ruXjU6PFXj<\/a><\/p>\n

— Chris \u201cLaw Dork\u201d Geidner (@chrisgeidner) February 10, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n