\nby Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
From Kennedy\u2019s video presentation, \u201c7 Minutes on the CDC,\u201d<\/em><\/a> Anne Dachel (Age of Autism<\/a>) has transcribed excerpts. This is explosive material, particularly because there is a chance Kennedy will head up an investigation of vaccine safety under Trump.<\/p>\n Kennedy understands the inherent conflict of interest at the CDC, which operates as a vaccine sales and marketing company, while at the same time posing as a neutral scientific body that assesses vaccine safety\u2014AND OF COURSE, THE CDC PRESENTS AN EVER-EXPANDING SCHEDULE OF \u201cNECESSARY\u201d VACCINES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.<\/p>\n Think of it: the CDC has the power\u2014backed by federal and state governments, and supported by the fake-news media\u2014to buy and sell vaccines, while deciding how many vaccines the population should submit to. What salesman wouldn\u2019t want to work for an outfit like that?<\/p>\n Here are Kennedy\u2019s remarks. Read them, study them, and learn the truth:<\/p>\n \u201cThe CDC is a very troubled agency, and it\u2019s not just me saying that. There have been four separate, intensive federal investigations by the United States Congress\u2014a three year investigation, 2001, 2002, 2003, by the United States Senate, Tom Coburn\u2019s committee, by the Inspector General of HHS in 2008, by the Office Integrity in 2014. All of them have painted the CDC as a cesspool of corruption, of an agency that has become an absolute subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry, and that has become a sock puppet, a spokesperson, a shill for the industry.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cCDC is not an independent agency. It is a vaccine company. CDC owns over twenty vaccine patents. It sells about $4.6 billion of vaccines every year. And its primary metric for success in all the departments in the agency are vaccine sales. The groups, for example the Immunization Safety Office, where the scientists who are supposed to be looking at efficacy and safety in vaccines, they are no longer a public service\u2026agency. They are subsumed in that metric: We have to sell as many of these things as possible. And so they do things to their science to make sure that nothing interferes\u2014no information\u2014interferes with sales.<\/p>\n \u201cNow there are two divisions of the vaccine branch where we worry about the corruption. The first one is called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. That is the committee that makes the decision about what new vaccines to add to the schedule.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWhen I was a boy, I got three vaccines. My children got sixty-nine vaccines. It changed in 1989.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWhy did it change in 1989?\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cBecause in 1986, Congress, [was] drowning in pharmaceutical industry money\u2014pharma puts more money into lobbying than any other industry\u2014Pharmaceutical companies have more lobbyists on Capitol Hill than there are Congress people.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cDo you think oil and gas has big influence in the Capitol? Well, that\u2019s the next biggest. The pharmaceutical industry puts twice into lobbying, double the amount that the oil and gas, and four times what defense and aero space put in. So they control Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIn 1986, Congress passed the Vaccine Act, and there were good reasons for them to pass it. \u2026At that time vaccine companies were being sued and were threatening to stop making vaccines. [Congress] said, okay, we\u2019re going to insulate them from lawsuits. They made it illegal to sue a vaccine company in this country, no matter how reckless the behavior, no matter how negligent, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how grievous the injury to the child, you cannot sue.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYou know how badly the pharmaceutical industry behaves when they are being sued, when there\u2019s a whole bar of lawyers who spend their whole life looking for ways to sue the pharmaceutical industry and tell these stories to juries, and how many billions every year are won from that industry.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWhat do you think would happen if all of a sudden, all the lawyers disappeared, all the class action suits, all the multi district litigation, all the depositions, all the document searches, the discovery? Just gone. Nobody can sue. You can make anything you want.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAnd then they made it so that it was much easier to get a vaccine on the schedule than it was to get a pharmaceutical into the market. There\u2019s no double blind placebo studies. They\u2019re all fast tracked into the market place.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe decision is made by this group, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And you\u2019d hope that the people who would serve on that committee would be kind of nerdy scientists who are narrowly focused on public health outcomes, but that\u2019s not who they are. The people who serve on that committee, almost all of them, have strong financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ll give you an example of how this committee works. In 1999, Paul Offit sat on that committee. And when you go to this committee, when you go to their meetings, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is in one room, and then there\u2019s a press deck in the next room. You have a whole bunch of seats there with guys who look like me, in suits. They\u2019re Wall Street analysts, pharmaceutical analysts. They\u2019re waiting to hear the decision. And as soon as they come out and announce which new vaccines they put on the schedule, those guys run out in the hallway and get on their cell phones, and you can watch the stocks spike. So it\u2019s become an economic enterprise.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cPaul Offit sat on the committee in 1999 that added the rota virus vaccine to the schedule. He owned a patent to a rota virus vaccine. He was then able to sell his vaccine to Merck for $186 million. He pocketed something around $29 million. He\u2019s never allowed anybody to ask him exactly how much, but according to the formula that they use, he would have gotten at least $29 million.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThat caused a little bit of a scandal in Washington, and the Inspector General of HHS was sent to investigate it. They did a complete investigation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and what they found, what they concluded was what he did was not illegal under CDC rules. Sixty-four percent of the people who sat on that committee had conflicts that were similar to Paul Offit, and ninety-seven percent might have conflicts because the rest of them never made out their conflict of interest forms. And nobody ever made them do it.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s very difficult when those kinds of shenanigans are going on. The American people have faith that all of these new vaccines that were added, beginning in 1989, are put there solely because this committee is concerned with public health.\u201d<\/p>\n Got it? This is four years\u2019 worth of university political-science curriculum in seven minutes. Well, the actual title is politicized science.<\/p>\n Every American who can read should read it.<\/p>\n This is what is really going on at America\u2019s number-one public health agency\u2014the agency that is also a corporation.<\/p>\n This is war against the American people from within.<\/p>\n