Mr. Garfinkle of Garfinkle\u2019s New Method Hebrew School in Milwaukee used to frequently echo King Solomon\u2019s admonition; \u201cThere\u2019s nothing new under the sun.\u201d I was reminded of that this week when the rapidly unfolding \u201cscandal\u201d of Trump\u2019s purported dealings with Russia hit the news. It has more than a few similarities with the Dan Rather faked-up story of GW Bush\u2019s National Guard service where an anonymous, never-found source supposedly gave Bill Burkett a\u00a0demonstrably fake report and Dan Rather ran with it. This time a Bush (Jeb) is involved but as an instigator of the story, not a victim. John McCain acts as the intermediary passing the junk on to the Intelligence Community, which makes sure it is published.<\/p>\n
If you\u2019re confused about it, let me put it in the context of the most reliable information I\u2019ve been able to put together, noting that I think the story is likely to become even more clear over\u00a0the next few days. As you will see, the dossier is so ridiculous, if anyone in the Intelligence Community fell for it, he\u2019s too stupid to allow in place, and if no one did but they still played a role in publicizing it, everyone involved needs to be fired<\/p>\n
A. Digging Up Dirt on Opponents<\/strong><\/p>\n In September of 2015 someone — now revealed as a Jeb Bush Super PAC donor — paid\u00a0 Fusion GPS, a Washington, D.C. outfit, to compile a dossier of dirt on Donald Trump. Fusion\u00a0engaged Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 agent in London, to do the job. While early accounts of the story refer to him as a \u201crespected source\u201d, he has a history of dumpster diving for Democrats<\/a>.<\/p>\n Kimberley Strassel at the Wall Street Journal <\/em>has been reporting on his work for some time and explains why he keeps getting hired: \u201cto gin up the ugliest, most scurrilous claims, and then trust the click-hungry media to disseminate them. No matter how false the allegations, the subject of the attack is required to respond, wasting precious time and losing credibility.\u201d<\/p>\n She warns this will be the left\u2019s game:<\/p>\n But it says something about the brass-knuckle approach of the left that it would go so far as to write a dossier suggesting that Mr. Trump is a Manchurian candidate — and then to foist that report into the hands of intelligence officials.<\/p>\n [snip]<\/p>\n So the left will increasingly rely on campaigns of delegitimization designed to force opponents onto a back foot, push them off task, or even bully them out of the public arena. In the absence of a winning policy argument, this is, in their minds, the best they\u2019ve got. Republicans had better be ready for it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n At about the time Trump won the nomination, funds from the Bush donors were cut off. Whether this was because the report was so shoddy or the effort so unavailing isn\u2019t clear. At that point supporters of Hillary Clinton became involved in financing the search.<\/p>\n Beginning in June and until December Steele delivered his findings — a series of short memos — to GPS. Although post-election no one was paying, Steele continued on this muckraking operation,<\/p>\n The memos suggested that the Russians were trying to influence Trump and stated that one of Trump\u2019s lawyers, Michael Cohen, had met with a Russian official in Prague. (A claim Cohen has credibly rebutted.)<\/p>\n Word of the dossier made it to the FBI via Senator John McCain, a man with an apparently insatiable desire to betray.\u00a0 McCain, who\u00a0heard about the dossier from a former diplomatic colleague of Tony Blair\u00a0(Sir Andrew Wood),\u00a0dispatched someone (apparently former State Department official David J. Kramer) to London to pick it up, then handed it off to the FBI.<\/p>\n From sources as yet unknown, news of the Steele report made it to journalists who investigated and finding no verification after investigating refused to print it.<\/p>\n The FBI, tried to get permission to tap into a server <\/a>in the Trump Tower, which was denied, then in a strangely odd act tried twice to get a warrant from FISA to tap into it. Whether this was in response to the dossier, I do not know.\u00a0 Andrew McCarthy writes in National Review Online:<\/p>\n To summarize, it appears there were no grounds for a criminal investigation of banking violations against Trump. Presumably based on the fact that the bank or banks at issue were Russian, the Justice Department and the FBI decided to continue investigating on national-security grounds. A FISA application in which Trump was \u201cnamed\u201d was rejected by the FISA court as overbroad, notwithstanding that the FISA court usually looks kindly on government surveillance requests. A second, more narrow application, apparently not naming Trump, may have been granted five months later; the best the media can say about it, however, is that the server on which the application centers is \u201cpossibly\u201d related to the Trump campaign\u2019s \u201calleged\u201d links to two Russian banks — under circumstances in which the FBI has previously found no \u201cnefarious purpose\u201d in some (undescribed) connection between Trump Tower and at least one Russian bank (whose connection to Putin\u2019s regime is not described). That is tissue-thin indeed. It\u2019s a good example of why investigations properly proceed in secret and are not publicly announced unless and until the government is ready to put its money where its mouth is by charging someone. It\u2019s a good example of why FISA surveillance is done in secret and its results are virtually never publicized — the problem is not just the possibility of tipping off the hostile foreign power; there is also the potential of tainting U.S. persons who may have done nothing wrong. While it\u2019s too early to say for sure, it may also be an example of what I thought would never actually happen: the government pretextually using its national-security authority to continue a criminal investigation after determining it lacked evidence of crimes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The second thrust of the Steele \u201cinvestigative\u201d report suggested Trump had engaged in some scatological conduct while in Russia, hiring prostitutes to urinate on the bed the Obamas had used there.<\/p>\n These claims were not only unverifiable, they were ludicrous as well, as was the Intelligence Community\u2019s justification for giving them one second\u2019s worth of credence.<\/p>\n As Iowahawk tweeted: \u201cUnconfirmed Denial of Unsourced Blockbuster Allegations Raises Questions, According To Insiders Who Requested Anonymity.\u201d<\/p>\n At American Digest<\/em>, Gerard Vanderleun explains precisely why<\/a>:<\/p>\n 1) An international business man who has spent decades in the rough and tumble world of real estate development and skyscraper construction and may be presumed to have some sophistication when it comes to wheeling and dealing with governments of all sorts throughout the world travels to<\/p>\n 2) Moscow. Not Moscow, Idaho, but Moscow in Russia. That would be Moscow the capital of one of the most paranoid and intrusive governments in the world (Both now and for the 19th and 20th centuries). It is a society and a government with a long history of…<\/p>\n 3) Secret police and the clandestine surveillance of its own citizens and visitors to the extent that the US was digging bugs out of the walls of its own embassy in Moscow for decades. When he gets to Moscow he stays at…<\/p>\n 4) The Moscow Ritz-Carlton in the \u201cPresidential Suite.\u201d Since such accommodations are typically only taken by the filthy rich and\/or representatives of foreign governments such as, say, presidents. And then this sophisticated and reasonably intelligent billionaire real estate developer…<\/p>\n 5) Assumes that such a suite in such a capitol city of such a government has no surveillance equipment at all installed in its rooms, bathrooms, closets, and — most importantly — bedrooms. He then asks the hotel staff to show him…<\/p>\n 6) The bed in which Barack Obama and his wife slept in when they were in this same \u201cPresidential Suite.\u201d Upon being shown the bed our businessman then…<\/p>\n 7) Contacts two high-dollar Russian hookers (who would never, ever, have anything to do with the KGB or other intelligence organs of Russia) and instructs them to…. Wait for it….<\/p>\n 8) Urinate on said bed in order to give said businessman some odd sort of thrill and…<\/p>\n 9) Said businessman remains utterly positive no agency of the Russian state is running cameras and microphones from every possible angle in the master bedroom in a \u201cPresidential Suite\u201d in a top hotel in the capital of Russia and…<\/p>\n 10) The two damp hookers will never, ever, reveal a word about their golden shower in the Ritz Carleton\u2019s \u201cPresidential Suite.\u201d<\/p>\n While I know that millions of morons are nodding like the drinking bird over the glass in their deep and abiding belief in this overflowing crock, I still find it hard to believe that there are smart people out there that really are this stupid. But of course they are not that stupid, not the smart ones. Instead they know this is a crock and yet they find they must drink from it lest their #NeverTrump fantasy world dissolve.<\/p>\n Sad. Their repetitive manic desperation now has foam flecking their lips and jowls as they dive down deep, and not for the last time, into this fuming septic tank of their own political sewage. Without even a snorkel. If they ever get out of the tank they will need a long, long golden shower<\/p><\/blockquote>\n B. The Intelligence Community Peddles the Dirt (then feigns dismay that it makes its way into the press).<\/strong><\/p>\n Among the morons apparently \u201cdrinking this up\u201d besides John McCain were high officials in the Intelligence Community, which passed the rumors on to the president and key congressional staff, although — despite conflicting reports about this — apparently never shared it with president-elect Trump. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claimed to have been \u201cdismayed\u201d<\/a> that this leaked out after having passed it on. He claimed as well that the Intelligence Community \u201chadn\u2019t made any judgment on whether the claims within the document were reliable\u201d<\/p>\n As my online friend Cecil Turner observes:\u00a0 \u201cFormer U.S. intelligence officials described the inclusion of the summary — drawn from ‘opposition research’ done by a political research firm — as highly unusual.<\/p>\n “Assuming, of course, that it is. The problem with this sort of thing is that it’s on the borderline between unknown and unknowable. Every character involved is either anonymous or has a name that sounds pseudonymous, and the sources are professional liars.<\/p>\n “Roll eyes, wait for actual evidence. The fact that it leaked strongly suggests there is none.\u201d<\/p>\n CNN, however, lapped it up, informed its readers of the existence of scandalous reports on Trump, and BuzzFeed, a clickbait site owned in part by NBC, then published the dossier, a portion of which, it seems, was provided by infonerd bulletin board\u00a04 Chan.<\/p>\n Asked why it had published an account of this nonsense which other news agencies had refused to print because it was completely unverifiable, CNN blamed BuzzFeed, noting it had not released the details, presumably on the assumption that readers whose curiosity had been piqued by the news wouldn\u2019t want details.<\/p>\n Steele has gone to ground ostensibly because he fears Russian reprisals, but I think it\u2019s because he wants to avoid answering questions about what are obviously fabrications to satisfy political interests who paid for this shoddy product.<\/p>\n As John Bolton commented<\/a>:<\/p>\n Kassam asked if Bolton had ever heard of the man revealed as the creator of the dossier, former British MI6 officer Christopher Steele. \u201cCould it be the case that somebody has just paid this guy to write these things, so this leak came out?\u201d Kassam asked.<\/p>\n \u201cWell, actually, that thought occurred to me because it\u2019s so bad. I haven\u2019t found anybody, including friends who are experienced in both diplomacy and military and intelligence affairs, who haven\u2019t just laughed at most of it,\u201d Bolton replied.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s filled with anonymous sources, single-source information and whatnot. If I were a corporate customer, and I wanted, in effect, a private investigator — I think that\u2019s what this firm basically is — and I got something back like this, I would refuse to pay. You or I could sit down at a computer right now and type out these 35 pages, just let our imaginations run wild, and if somebody would pay for it, I suppose it\u2019s nice work if you can get it,\u201d he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/americanthinker.com\/images\/bucket\/2014-10\/193349_5_.png\")
Steele hadn\u2019t been in Russia for decades and as a former British spy could not have done the work himself. So, as the account in theNew York Times<\/em> continues<\/a>, \u201che hired native Russian speakers to call informants inside Russia and made surreptitious contact with his own connections in the country as well.\u201d<\/p>\n