{"id":62955,"date":"2017-01-11T15:55:30","date_gmt":"2017-01-11T19:55:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=62955"},"modified":"2017-01-11T15:55:30","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T19:55:30","slug":"glenn-greenwald-slams-the-unverified-claims-of-the-democrat-cheered-deep-states-war-with-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=62955","title":{"rendered":"Glenn Greenwald Slams The &#8216;Unverified Claims&#8217; Of The Democrat-Cheered Deep State&#8217;s War With Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/theintercept.com\/2017\/01\/11\/the-deep-state-goes-to-war-with-president-elect-using-unverified-claims-as-dems-cheer\/\"><em>Submitted by Glenn Greenwald via The Intercept,<\/em><\/a><!--more--><\/p>\n<div class=\"PostContent\">\n<div>\n<p><strong>In January, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered <a href=\"http:\/\/coursesa.matrix.msu.edu\/%7Ehst306\/documents\/indust.html\">his farewell address<\/a> after serving two terms as U.S. president; the five-star general chose to warn Americans of\u00a0this specific threat to democracy<\/strong>: <em>\u201cIn the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.\u201d <\/em>That warning was issued prior to the decadelong escalation of the Vietnam War, three more decades of Cold War mania, and the post-9\/11 era, all of which radically expanded\u00a0that unelected faction\u2019s power even further.<\/p>\n<p>This is the faction that is now engaged in open warfare\u00a0against the duly elected and <a href=\"http:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2017\/01\/10\/politics\/donald-trump-transition-poll\/\">already widely disliked<\/a> president-elect, Donald Trump.<strong> They are using classic Cold War dirty tactics and the defining ingredients of what has until recently been denounced as\u00a0\u201cFake News.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Their most valuable instrument is the U.S. media, much of which reflexively reveres, serves, believes, and sides with hidden intelligence officials.<\/strong> And Democrats, still reeling from their unexpected and traumatic election loss as well as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/2016\/11\/10\/13576488\/democratic-party-smoking-pile-rubble\">a systemic collapse of their party<\/a>, seemingly divorced further and further from reason with each passing day, are willing \u2014\u00a0<em>eager<\/em>\u00a0\u2014 to embrace\u00a0any claim, cheer any tactic, align with any villain, regardless of how unsupported, tawdry and damaging those behaviors might be.<\/p>\n<p>The serious dangers posed by a Trump presidency are numerous and manifest. There are a wide array of legitimate and effective tactics for combatting those threats: from bipartisan congressional coalitions and constitutional legal challenges to citizen uprisings and sustained and aggressive civil disobedience. All of those strategies have periodically proven themselves effective\u00a0in times of political crisis or authoritarian overreach.<\/p>\n<p>But cheering <em>for the CIA<\/em> and its shadowy allies to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive. Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of the worst kind. Demanding that\u00a0evidence-free, anonymous assertions be instantly venerated as Truth \u2014 despite emanating from\u00a0the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie \u2014 is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those doing it.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond all that, there is no bigger favor that Trump opponents can do for him than attacking him with such lowly, shabby, obvious shams, recruiting large media outlets to lead the way. When it comes time to expose actual Trump corruption and criminality, who is going to believe the people and institutions who have demonstrated they are willing to endorse\u00a0any assertions\u00a0no matter how factually baseless, who deploy\u00a0any journalistic tactic no matter how unreliable and removed from basic means of ensuring accuracy?<\/p>\n<p><strong>All of these toxic ingredients were on full display yesterday as the Deep State unleashed its tawdriest and most aggressive assault yet on Trump<\/strong>: vesting credibility in and then causing the public disclosure of a completely unvetted and unverified document, compiled by a paid, anonymous operative while he was working for both\u00a0GOP and Democratic opponents of\u00a0Trump, accusing Trump of a wide range of crimes, corrupt acts and salacious private conduct. The reaction to all of this illustrates that while the Trump presidency poses grave dangers, so, too, do those who are increasingly unhinged in their flailing, slapdash, and destructive\u00a0attempts to undermine it.<\/p>\n<p>*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n<p><strong>For months, the CIA, with unprecedented clarity, overtly threw its weight behind Hillary Clinton\u2019s candidacy and sought to defeat Donald Trump. <\/strong>In August, former acting CIA Director Michael Morell\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/08\/05\/opinion\/campaign-stops\/i-ran-the-cia-now-im-endorsing-hillary-clinton.html\">announced his endorsement of Clinton in\u00a0the New York Times<\/a>\u00a0and claimed that \u201cMr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.\u201d The\u00a0CIA and NSA director under George W. Bush, Gen. Michael Hayden, also endorsed Clinton, and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/former-cia-chief-trump-is-russias-useful-fool\/2016\/11\/03\/cda42ffe-a1d5-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html?utm_term=.771eff2c3b02\">went to the Washington Post to warn<\/a>, in the week before the election, that \u201cDonald Trump really does sound a lot like Vladimir Putin,\u201d adding that\u00a0Trump is \u201cthe useful fool, some naif, manipulated by Moscow, secretly held in contempt, but whose blind support is happily accepted and exploited.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It is not hard to understand why the CIA preferred Clinton over Trump. Clinton was critical of Obama for restraining the CIA\u2019s proxy war in Syria\u00a0and was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/hillary-clinton-syria-no-fly-zone-third-debate_us_58084280e4b0180a36e91a53\">eager to expand that war<\/a>, while Trump denounced it. Clinton clearly wanted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/06\/12\/world\/europe\/defying-obama-many-in-congress-press-to-arm-ukraine.html\">a harder line than Obama took<\/a> against the CIA\u2019s long-standing foes in Moscow, while Trump wanted improved relations and greater cooperation. In general, Clinton defended and intended to extend the decadeslong international military order\u00a0on which the CIA and Pentagon\u2019s preeminence depends, while Trump \u2014 through a still-uncertain mix of\u00a0instability and extremist conviction \u2014 posed a threat to it.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever one\u2019s views are on those debates, it is the democratic framework \u2014 the presidential election, the confirmation process, congressional leaders, judicial proceedings, citizen activism and protest, civil disobedience \u2014 that should determine how they are resolved. All of those policy disputes were debated out in the open; the public heard them; and Trump won. Nobody should\u00a0crave the rule of Deep State overlords.<\/p>\n<p>Yet craving Deep State rule\u00a0is exactly what prominent Democratic operatives and media figures are doing.\u00a0Any doubt about that is now\u00a0dispelled. Just last week, Chuck Schumer issued a warning to Trump, telling\u00a0Rachel Maddow that Trump was being \u201creally dumb\u201d by challenging the unelected intelligence community because of all the ways they possess to destroy those who dare to stand up to them:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Chuck Schumer on Trump&#39;s tweet hitting intel community: &quot;He&#39;s being really dumb to do this.&quot; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/MOcU8ruOPK\">https:\/\/t.co\/MOcU8ruOPK<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/kylegriffin1\/status\/816500643062026241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 4, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>And last night, many Democrats openly embraced and celebrated what was, so plainly, an attempt by the Deep State to sabotage an elected official who had defied it: ironically, its own form of blackmail.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n<p><strong>Back in October, a\u00a0political operative\u00a0and former employee\u00a0of the British intelligence agency MI6 was being paid by Democrats to dig up dirt on Trump <\/strong>(before that, he was paid by anti-Trump Republicans). He tried to convince countless media outlets to publish a long memo he had written filled with explosive accusations\u00a0about Trump\u2019s treason, business corruption\u00a0and sexual escapades, with the overarching theme that Trump was in servitude to Moscow because they were blackmailing and bribing him.<\/p>\n<p>Despite how many had it, no media outlets published it. That was because these were anonymous claims unaccompanied by any evidence at all, and even in this more permissive new media environment, nobody was willing to be\u00a0journalistically associated with it. As the New York Times\u2019 Executive Editor Dean Baquet <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/01\/10\/business\/buzzfeed-donald-trump-russia.html?hp&amp;amp;action=click&amp;amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;amp;module=first-column-region&amp;amp;region=top-news&amp;amp;WT.nav=top-news\">put it last night<\/a>, he would not publish these \u201ctotally unsubstantiated\u201d allegations because \u201cwe, like others, investigated the allegations and haven\u2019t corroborated them, and we felt we\u2019re not in the business of publishing things we can\u2019t stand by.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The closest this operative got to success was convincing Mother Jones\u2019s David Corn to publish <a href=\"http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/politics\/2016\/10\/veteran-spy-gave-fbi-info-alleging-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump\">an October 31 article<\/a>\u00a0reporting that \u201ca former senior intelligence officer for a Western country\u201d claims that \u201che provided the [FBI]\u00a0with memos, based on his recent interactions with Russian sources, contending the Russian government has for years tried to co-opt and assist Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But because this was just an anonymous claim\u00a0unaccompanied by any evidence or any specifics (which Corn withheld), it made very little impact. All of that changed yesterday. Why?<\/p>\n<p>What changed was the intelligence community\u2019s resolution\u00a0to cause this all to become public and to be viewed as credible. In December, John McCain <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/mollymotoole\/status\/819187982934638592\">provided a copy<\/a> of this report to the FBI and demanded they take it seriously.<\/p>\n<p>At some point last week, the chiefs of the intelligence agencies decided to declare that this ex-British intelligence operative was \u201ccredible\u201d enough that his allegations warranted briefing both Trump and Obama about them, thus stamping\u00a0some sort of vague, indirect, and deniable official approval on these accusations. Someone \u2014 by all appearances, numerous officials \u2014 then went to CNN to tell them they had done this, causing CNN to go on-air and, in the gravest of tones, announce the \u201cBreaking News\u201d that \u201cthe nation\u2019s top intelligence officials\u201d briefed Obama and Trump that Russia had compiled information that \u201ccompromised President-elect Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"img-wrap align-center width-fixed\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-article-medium wp-image-105413\" src=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/cnntrump-1484138927-540x305.png\" \/><\/div>\n<p>CNN refused to specify what these allegations were on the ground that they could not \u201cverify\u201d them. But with this document in the hands of multiple media outlets, it was only a matter of time \u2014 a small amount of time \u2014 before someone would step up and publish the whole thing. Buzzfeed quickly obliged, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/kenbensinger\/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia?utm_term=.vaKbmdY8N#.fbZpjJZEw\">airing all of the unvetted, anonymous claims<\/a> about Trump.<\/p>\n<p>Its editor-in-chief Ben Smith <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/BuzzFeedBen\/status\/818978955965464580\">published a memo<\/a> explaining that decision, saying that\u2014- although there \u201cis serious reason to doubt the allegations\u201d \u2014 Buzzfeed in general \u201cerrs on the side of publication\u201d and \u201cAmericans can make up their own minds about the allegations.\u201d Publishing this document predictably produced massive traffic (and thus profit) for the site, with millions of people viewing the article and presumably reading the \u201cdossier.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"img-wrap align-center width-fixed\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/buzzfeedtrump-1484139321.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-article-medium wp-image-105419\" src=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/buzzfeedtrump-1484139321-540x348.png\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>One can certainly\u00a0object to\u00a0Buzzfeed\u2019s decision and, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/01\/10\/business\/buzzfeed-donald-trump-russia.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news\">the New York Times notes this morning<\/a>, many journalists are doing so. It\u2019s almost impossible to imagine a scenario where it\u2019s justifiable for a news outlet to publish a totally anonymous, unverified, unvetted document filled with scurrilous and inflammatory allegations about which its own editor-in-chief says\u00a0there \u201cis serious reason to doubt the allegations,\u201d on the ground that they want to leave it to the public to decide whether to believe it.<\/p>\n<p>But even if one believes there is no such case where that is justified, yesterday\u2019s circumstances presented the most compelling scenario possible for doing this. Once CNN strongly hinted at these allegations, it left it to the public imagination to conjure up the dirt\u00a0Russia allegedly had to blackmail and control Trump. By publishing these accusations, BuzzFeed ended that speculation. More importantly, it allowed everyone to see how\u00a0dubious this\u00a0document is, one the CIA and CNN had elevated into some sort of grave national security threat.<\/p>\n<p>*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n<p><strong>Almost immediately\u00a0after it was published, the farcical nature of the \u201cdossier\u201d\u00a0manifested.<\/strong> Not only was its author anonymous, but he was paid by Democrats (and, before that, by Trump\u2019s GOP adversaries) to dig up dirt on Trump. Worse, he himself cited no evidence of any kind, but instead relied on a string of other anonymous people in Russia he claims told him these things. Worse still, the document was filled with amateur errors.<\/p>\n<div class=\"img-wrap align-center width-fixed\"><a href=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/moore-1484140420.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-article-medium wp-image-105429\" src=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/moore-1484140420-540x389.png\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>While many of the claims are inherently unverified, some can be confirmed. One such claim \u2014 that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen secretly traveled to\u00a0Prague in August to meet with Russian officials \u2014 was strongly denied by Cohen, who insisted he had never been to Prague in his life (Prague is the same place that foreign intelligence officials <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2001\/10\/27\/world\/nation-challenged-investigation-czechs-confirm-iraqi-agent-met-with-terror.html\">claimed, in 2001<\/a>, was the site of a nonexistent meeting between Iraqi officials and 9\/11 hijackers, which contributed\u00a0to <a href=\"http:\/\/usatoday30.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2003-09-06-poll-iraq_x.htm\">70% of Americans believing<\/a>, as late as the fall of 2003, that\u00a0Saddam personally planned the 9\/11 attack).\u00a0This morning, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/spy-agencies-investigating-claims-trump-advisers-worked-with-russian-agents-1484101731\">the Wall Street Journal reported<\/a> that \u201cthe FBI has found no evidence that [Cohen]\u00a0traveled to the Czech Republic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>None of this stopped Democratic operatives and prominent media figures from treating these totally unverified and unvetted allegations as grave revelations. From Vox\u2019s Zach Beauchamp:<\/p>\n<p>BuzzFeed\u2019s Borzou Daraghai posted a long series of tweets discussing the profound consequences of these revelations, only occasionally remembering to insert the rather important journalistic caveat \u201cif true\u201d in his\u00a0meditations:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Whoa \ud83d\ude32. So guessing the press conference tomorrow is off. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/e4iNrNKgrh\">https:\/\/t.co\/e4iNrNKgrh<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/VEa44PeICe\">pic.twitter.com\/VEa44PeICe<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Borzou Daragahi \ud83d\udd8a\ud83d\uddd2 (@borzou) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/borzou\/status\/818973834359566337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 11, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, liberal commentator Rebecca Solnit declared this to be a \u201csmoking gun\u201d that proves Trump\u2019s \u201ctreason,\u201d while Daily Kos\u2019 Markos Moulitsas sounded the same theme:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">With CNN confirming that intelligence chiefs consider this report credible, it&#39;s about time to start using the word &quot;treason&quot;<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Markos Moulitsas (@markos) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/markos\/status\/818976973493915648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">January 11, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"img-wrap align-center width-fixed\">\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/solnit-1484141374.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-105435\" src=\"http:\/\/prod01-cdn07.cdn.firstlook.org\/wp-uploads\/sites\/1\/2017\/01\/solnit-1484141374-300x130.png\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>While some Democrats sounded notes of caution \u2014 party loyalist Josh Marshall <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/joshtpm\/status\/818965174778470401\">commendably urged:<\/a>\u00a0\u201cI would say in reviewing raw, extremely raw \u2018intel\u2019, people shld retain their skepticism even if they rightly think Trump is the worst\u201d \u2014 the overwhelming reaction was the same as all the other instances where the CIA and its allies released unverified claims about Trump and Russia: instant embrace of the evidence-free assertions as Truth, combined with proclamations that it demonstrated Trump\u2019s status as a traitor (with anyone expressing skepticism designated\u00a0a Kremlin agent or stooge).<\/p>\n<p>*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n<p><strong>There is a real danger here that this maneuver can harshly backfire, to the great benefit of Trump and to the great detriment of those who want to oppose him.<\/strong> If any of the significant claims\u00a0in this \u201cdossier\u201d turn out to be provably false \u2014 such as Cohen\u2019s trip to Prague \u2014 many people will conclude, with Trump\u2019s encouragement, that large media outlets (CNN and BuzzFeed) and anti-Trump factions inside the government (CIA) are deploying \u201cFake News\u201d to destroy\u00a0him. In the eyes of many people, that will forever discredit \u2014 render impotent \u2014 future journalistic expos\u00e9s that are based on actual, corroborated wrongdoing.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond that, the threat posed by submitting ourselves to the CIA and empowering it to reign supreme outside of the democratic process is \u2014 as Eisenhower warned \u2014 an even more severe danger. The threat of\u00a0being ruled by unaccountable and unelected entities is self-evident and grave. That\u2019s especially true when the entity behind which so many are rallying is one with a long and deliberate history of lying, propaganda, war crimes, torture, and the worst atrocities imaginable.<\/p>\n<p>All of the claims about Russia\u2019s interference in U.S. elections and ties to Trump should be fully investigated by a credible body, and the evidence publicly disclosed to the fullest extent possible. As my colleague <a href=\"http:\/\/theintercept.com\/2017\/01\/06\/underwhelming-intel-report-shows-need-for-congressional-investigation-of-dnc-hack\/\">Sam Biddle argued<\/a> last week after disclosure of the farcical intelligence community report on Russia hacking \u2014 one which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/daily\/2017\/01\/09\/russia-trump-election-flawed-intelligence\/\">even Putin\u2019s foes<\/a> mocked <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2017\/01\/06\/u-s-spy-report-blames-putin-for-hacks-but-doesn-t-back-it-up.html\">as a bad joke<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 the utter lack of evidence for these allegations means\u00a0\u201cwe need an independent, resolute inquiry.\u201d But until then, assertions that are unaccompanied by evidence and disseminated anonymously should be treated with the utmost skepticism \u2014 not lavished with convenience-driven gullibility.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Most important of all, the legitimate and effective tactics for opposing Trump are being utterly drowned by these\u00a0irrational, desperate, ad hoc crusades that have no cogent strategy and make his opponents appear increasingly devoid of reason and gravity.<\/strong> Right now, Trump\u2019s opponents are behaving as media critic Adam Johnson <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/adamjohnsonNYC\/status\/806206076286799872\">described<\/a>: as ideological jelly fish, floating around aimlessly and lost, desperately latching on\u00a0to whatever barge randomly passes by.<\/p>\n<p>There are solutions to Trump. They involve reasoned strategizing\u00a0and patient focus on issues people actually care about. Whatever those solutions are, venerating the intelligence community, begging for its intervention, and equating their dark and dirty assertions as Truth are most certainly not among them. Doing that cannot possibly achieve any good, and is already doing much harm.<\/p>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/news\/2017-01-11\/glenn-greenwald-slams-unverified-claims-democrat-cheered-deep-states-war-trump#comment-8781818\">http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/news\/2017-01-11\/glenn-greenwald-slams-unverified-claims-democrat-cheered-deep-states-war-trump#comment-8781818<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Submitted by Glenn Greenwald via The Intercept,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62955"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62955\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}