![](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/03ethics-master768.jpg\")
<\/a>WASHINGTON \u2014 House Republicans, overriding their top leaders, voted on Monday to significantly curtail the power of an independent ethics office set up in 2008 in the aftermath of corruption scandals that sent three members of Congress to jail.<\/p>\n
The move to effectively kill the Office of Congressional Ethics was not made public until late Monday, when Representative Robert W. Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, announced that the House Republican Conference had approved the change<\/a>. There was no advance notice or debate on the measure.<\/p>\n The surprising vote came on the eve of the start of a new session of Congress, where emboldened Republicans are ready to push an ambitious agenda on everything from health care to infrastructure, issues that will be the subject of intense lobbying from corporate interests. The House Republicans\u2019 move would take away both power and independence from an investigative body, and give lawmakers more control over internal inquiries.<\/p>\n It also came on the eve of a historic shift in power in Washington, where Republicans control both houses of Congress and where a wealthy businessman with myriad potential conflicts of interest is preparing to move into the White House.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Speaker Paul D. Ryan and Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the majority leader, spoke out during the meeting to oppose the measure, aides said on Monday night. The full House is scheduled to vote on Tuesday on the rules, which would last for two years, until the next congressional elections.<\/p>\n In place of the office, Republicans would create a new Office of Congressional Complaint Review that would report to the House Ethics Committee, which has been accused of ignoring credible allegations of wrongdoing by lawmakers.<\/p>\n \u201cPoor way to begin draining the swamp,\u201d Tom Fitton, president of the conservative group Judicial Watch, said on Twitter<\/a>. He added<\/a>, \u201cSwamp wins with help of @SpeakerRyan, @RepGoodlatte.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Goodlatte defended the action in a statement<\/a> on Monday evening, saying it would strengthen ethics oversight in the House while also giving lawmakers better protections against what some of them have called overzealous efforts by the Office of Congressional Ethics.<\/p>\n \u201cThe O.C.E. has a serious and important role in the House, and this amendment does nothing to impede their work,\u201d the statement said in part.<\/p>\n But Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House minority leader, joined others who had worked to create the office in expressing outrage at the move and the secretive way it was orchestrated.<\/p>\n \u201cRepublicans claim they want to \u2018drain the swamp,\u2019 but the night before the new Congress gets sworn in, the House G.O.P. has eliminated the only independent ethics oversight of their actions,\u201d Ms. Pelosi said in a statement on Monday night. \u201cEvidently, ethics are the first casualty of the new Republican Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n The Office of Congressional Ethics has been controversial since its creation and has faced intense criticism from many of its lawmaker targets \u2014 both Democrats and Republicans \u2014 as its investigations have consistently been more aggressive than those conducted by the House Ethics Committee.<\/p>\n The body was created after a string of serious ethical issues starting a decade ago, including bribery allegations against Representatives Duke Cunningham, Republican of California; William J. Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana; and Bob Ney, Republican of Ohio. All three were ultimately convicted and served time in jail.<\/p>\n The Office of Congressional Ethics, which is overseen by a six-member outside board, does not have subpoena power. But it has its own staff of investigators who spend weeks conducting confidential interviews and collecting documents based on complaints they receive from the public, or news media reports, before issuing findings that detail any possible violation of federal rules or laws. The board then votes on whether to refer the matter to the full House Ethics Committee, which conducts its own review.<\/p>\n But the House Ethics Committee, even if it dismisses the potential ethics violation as unfounded, is required to release the Office of Congressional Ethics report detailing the alleged wrongdoing, creating a deterrent to such questionable behavior by lawmakers.<\/p>\n Under the new arrangement, the Office of Congressional Complaint Review could not take anonymous complaints, and all of its investigations would be overseen by the House Ethics Committee itself, which is made up of lawmakers who answer to their own party.<\/p>\n The Office of Congressional Complaint Review would also have special rules to \u201cbetter safeguard the exercise of due process rights of both subject and witness,\u201d Mr. Goodlatte said. The provision most likely reflects complaints by certain lawmakers that the ethics office\u2019s staff investigations were at times too aggressive, an allegation that watchdog groups dismissed as evidence that lawmakers were just trying to protect themselves.<\/p>\n \u201cO.C.E. is one of the outstanding ethics accomplishments of the House of Representatives, and it has played a critical role in seeing that the congressional ethics process is no longer viewed as merely a means to sweep problems under the rug,\u201d said a statement from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, an ethics watchdog group that has filed many complaints with the Office of Congressional Ethics.<\/p>\n \u201cIf the 115th Congress begins with rules amendments undermining O.C.E., it is setting itself up to be dogged by scandals and ethics issues for years and is returning the House to dark days when ethics violations were rampant and far too often tolerated,\u201d the statement continued.<\/p>\n One Republican House aide on Monday disputed the suggestion that the Office of Congressional Complaint Review was a new entity, arguing that the current staff would largely remain and that the outside board overseeing it would also continue to exist.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s the same office, same people, most of the same rules,\u201d said the House aide, who was not authorized to speak on the record.<\/p>\n