![\"lexi\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/lexi.jpg\")
<\/a>LEXI DILLON<\/p><\/div>\n
Custody had previously been awarded to an alleged child molester who is not allowed in the United States, reportedly for national security reasons.\u00a0 The alleged child molester Matathep Srikureja is not an American citizen but rather a Pakistani whose only citizenship is in Thailand.\u00a0 He reportedly has a history of meeting with Jihadist groups in secret, and it is suspected that this and Lexi\u2019s credible claims that he molested her are the reasons the U.S. Government will not allow Srikureja in the country.\u00a0 While government officials have an apparent concern about the safety of the public, they appear to have no concern at all for the safety of an American child who says Srikureja repeatedly molested and took lots of naked pictures of her.\u00a0 Doctors, police reports and therapists have substantiated the girl\u2019s accusations against her father Srikureja.\u00a0 One of the father\u2019s attorneys had reportedly been an arms dealer, providing arms to Middle Easterners.<\/p>\n
After learning of the abuse, Judge James Waltz gave full custody to Srikureja and prevented the mother Ruby Dillon from seeing her daughter Lexi to punish Ruby for getting her child medical help when she needed it.\u00a0 The doctor discovered the father\u2019s abuse.\u00a0 In California, whistle-blowing is considered a crime while child molestation is over-looked by family court judges like James Waltz and Glenn Salter.\u00a0 The mother Ruby Dillon has a record of being a positive role model for her daughter and a loving person.\u00a0 She is a dentist who is widely respected.<\/p>\n
When it was clear Srikureja had abandoned the child in view of the fact that he had not seen her in ten months, Ruby hoped she would regain her rights. \u00a0 On May 6, 2014, in order to counter Ruby\u2019s attempt to regain custody of her daughter, Judge Salter obtained the identities of everyone in the courtroom and then kicked the audience out of the courtroom. Then Salter had Ruby arrested on a warrant Salter himself issued in that session.\u00a0 The heinous crime: a six year old traffic infraction. Salter set bail at $15,000.\u00a0 As the charges were baseless and likely illegal, they were dismissed \u2013 but not by Salter.<\/p>\n
On June 6, 2014, Salter lifted a travel ban that would have prevented the foreign alleged child molester from taking the girl to a sex slave ring in Thailand.\u00a0 With each hearing, comes a new violation of nine year olds Lexi\u2019s right to be free from sex. The public has become concerned about the tendency of judges to give full custody to rapists and killers while excluding protective parents from the lives of their children.\u00a0 Recent statistics reveal that more than 58,000 American children are abused each year solely because the family law system is broken.<\/p>\n
On June 27, 2014, there was a heavy law enforcement presence at the courthouse.\u00a0 Protective moms and others asked questions and it slipped out that there was a plan to arrest Ruby no matter what and it did not matter that she had broken no law.\u00a0 Supporters of Ruby Dillon filled all the seats with additional supporters having to stand out in the hallway.\u00a0 Judge Salter entered the courtroom and saw all those eyes and ears about to pay attention to the proceedings.\u00a0 He again ordered the courtroom cleared.\u00a0 Press TV reporter Brett Redmayne-Titely stood and asked, \u201cWhat are you hiding Judge?\u201d\u00a0 People present observed that the bailiff appeared to reach for his gun. \u00a0 After leaving the courtroom, observers noted that the Lexi Dillon case was not on the list of cases to be heard that day in that courtroom. On the official roster, the name was whited out \u2013 kept a secret.\u00a0 Informed parents explained that the secrecy makes it possible for illegal rulings to take place. Parents and victims of the system are demanding that that family law hearings be made public and that TV cameras and video-recordings be used to protect the children.<\/p>\n
Removal from the courtroom did not discourage the audience.\u00a0 The supporters of Ruby and Lexi stayed at the courthouse.\u00a0 Some went downstairs and took to the sidewalk with a bull horn to inform the public of events in Salter\u2019s courtroom.\u00a0 Others stayed outside the lynching chamber and waited for word on events taking place inside.<\/p>\n
Ruby\u2019s attorney filed a California Code of Civil Procedure 170.1 (recusal for cause) motion against Salter.\u00a0 Under the law, all proceedings are to stop when such a motion is filed.\u00a0 Then the law requires a different judge to hear and rule on the motion before any more proceedings may take place before the judge whose recusal is sought. The recusal statute in the State of California is clear and unequivocal on this.\u00a0 But in family law courts in California and particularly in Orange County, the law is rarely if ever followed. \u00a0 The failure to follow codified law in Orange County is largely the responsibility of family law Presiding Judge Clay Smith.\u00a0 One of his jobs is to make sure that, when a 170.1 motion is filed, the proceedings stop until the recusal motion is decided. \u00a0 In violation of the statute, Salter continued on in total disregard of the law.\u00a0 This made anything that took place from then on illegal and the proceeding, itself, illegal.<\/p>\n
But where was Ruby? \u00a0 Her attorney Ron Funk came out and said that the Judge planned to issue a bench warrant if she did not show up.\u00a0 How can a judge issue a bench warrant against someone who does not show up to an illegal proceeding? \u00a0 Judge Salter had not yet had his fill of illegalities. Not only did Salter continue, but he had an in absentia hearing wherein he placed Ruby\u2019s rights on trial.\u00a0 A witness called against Ruby who dared to testify in support of her was subjected to so much apparent bullying that the witness left the courtroom in tears.\u00a0 At the end of the session, Salter set a bond for Ruby for $25,000 for missing the illegal hearing.\u00a0 The alleged molester had failed to appear at every proceeding over an eleven month period and also failed to appear at this illegal hearing, but Salter threw the book at Ruby for failing to appear at an illegal proceeding where Salter planned to arrest Ruby for no legitimate reason if she showed.<\/p>\n
So what it next?\u00a0 Salter has set the second day of his illegal hearing for 1:30 P.M. on July 7, 2014, in L60, Lamoreaux Injustice Center, 341 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868.\u00a0 Will Judge Smith remember his role as family law presiding judge and call off the illegal hearing until the statutorily-mandated recusal hearing takes place?\u00a0 The public plans to watch and to stand up in support of Lexi\u2019s right to be with her mother Ruby.\u00a0 Buses are being prepared for the occasion.\u00a0 To the world, Ruby is a hero \u2013 a symbol of a mom who is putting her daughter\u2019s safety and welfare above her own. \u00a0 Her struggle is giving rise to a new civil rights movement \u2013 a movement wherein children will have the right to be with parents they love and who love them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By Cassandra Loche On June 27, 2014, protective parents drew a line in the sand and said \u201cno\u201d to the court-sponsored human sex trafficking of nine year old Lexi Dillon. \u00a0 Parents from four counties stood firm inside and outside … Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n