{"id":60809,"date":"2016-12-18T18:54:20","date_gmt":"2016-12-18T22:54:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=60809"},"modified":"2016-12-18T20:09:52","modified_gmt":"2016-12-19T00:09:52","slug":"who-is-going-to-check-the-facebooks-fake-news-checkers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=60809","title":{"rendered":"Who is going to check the Facebook &#8216;fake news&#8217; checkers?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Facebook\u2019s &#8216;anti-fake news&#8217; plan looks like effort to curb alternative media<\/h1>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_60811\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/58569becc46188fb7f8b45cc.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-60811\" class=\"wp-image-60811\" src=\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/58569becc46188fb7f8b45cc.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"333\" srcset=\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/58569becc46188fb7f8b45cc.jpg 900w, https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/58569becc46188fb7f8b45cc-300x167.jpg 300w, https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/58569becc46188fb7f8b45cc-768x427.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-60811\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">\u00a9 Dado Ruvic \/ Reuters<\/p><\/div>\n<p>RT.com<\/p>\n<p>There are serious concerns over a social media giant&#8217;s plans to debunk spurious news stories. And many are puzzled about the real agenda at play.<\/p>\n<p>You don\u2019t need to worship at the altar of George Orwell to see where this is going. Under tremendous assault from the American establishment media over the proliferation of what they define as <em>\u2019fake news\u2019<\/em> on the platform, internet behemoth Facebook has finally caved in and agreed to regulate content. While, in principle, the concept sounds relatively noble, the manner in which it&#8217;s proposed to implement it merits many questions.<\/p>\n<p>Among them are the continuing dangers of American domination of the world wide web and the liberal bias of that country\u2019s popular press. But most worrying is the uncharted territory we are entering. Because there has never been a media portal as dominant as Facebook. In the past, big broadcasters or newsagent chains might have enjoyed outsized influence, but Mark Zuckerbeg\u2019s firm is an effective monopoly.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">CIA meddled in \u2018hundreds\u2019 of elections: Ron Paul talks Russia-blaming, fake news and more on RT<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/qxttAcpYSm\">https:\/\/t.co\/qxttAcpYSm<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1kd44g8AVH\">pic.twitter.com\/1kd44g8AVH<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RT America (@RT_America) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_America\/status\/809994031728103424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 17, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Whereas papers have always been curated by editors, their power was limited by the sheer number of competitors in every national market. And the more different they were, the better for society in general. However, there is only one Facebook, and its power, in this regard, is extraordinary.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, another big problem here is that one person\u2019s <em>\u201cfake news\u201d<\/em> could be another\u2019s truth. And that\u2019s before we mention how some of the outlets pressuring Facebook are often guilty of making up stories themselves.<\/p>\n<h2>Strange Bedfellows<\/h2>\n<p>To filter content, Facebook has joined up with Poynter, an self-proclaimed <em>\u201cinternational fact-checking network,\u201d<\/em> which presents itself as a neutral body with great integrity. Yet, a cursory glance at its funding sources is enough to set alarm bells ringing. They include Pierre Omidyar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-4041910\/Clinton-mega-donor-George-Soros-leads-line-liberal-billionaires-funding-Facebook-s-fake-news-fact-checker.html#ixzz4T79dwNU2\" target=\"_blank\">George Soros<\/a>\u00a0and Washington\u2019s National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA soft-power cutout. As it happens, regular RT readers will remember these three as the primary foreign backers of Ukraine\u2019s Maidan coup in 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, it\u2019s clear that this project could easily wind up as some sort of <em>\u201cministry of truth\u201d<\/em> with only organizations who adhere to liberal Washington\u2019s official line permitted unfettered access to Facebook\u2019s primary news feeds. And this is very dangerous.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Facebook up to the facts: Social network, third party fact-checkers to sort out \u2018fake news\u2019<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/jZmZXrpl06\">https:\/\/t.co\/jZmZXrpl06<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/X6uf2LKfdh\">pic.twitter.com\/X6uf2LKfdh<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RT America (@RT_America) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_America\/status\/809627870800789504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 16, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the fact that Poynter\u2019s sponsors, which also include Bill Gates and Google, almost uniformly supported Hillary Clinton in the recent US election is very troubling. Because it\u2019s another indication of how, having endured a series of electoral setbacks this year, the globalist elite is now effectively trying to block out dissenting voices.<\/p>\n<p>That said, nobody is disputing whether <em>\u201cfake news\u201d<\/em> is a problem. It\u2019s just hard to find agreement on its definition. For instance, very few in the west would define the Washington Post, Guardian, Daily Telegraph or New York Times as providers of fictional reportage, but viewed from Moscow it&#8217;s often a different story.<\/p>\n<h2>Mainstream Muck<\/h2>\n<p>Only last month, WaPo accused 200 non-mainstream sites of acting on behalf of the Kremlin, in a story which has been definitively debunked by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rt.com\/usa\/369598-washington-post-fake-propaganda\/\" target=\"_blank\">numerous<\/a>\u00a0credible <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rt.com\/op-edge\/368180-fake-news-washington-post\/\" target=\"_blank\">sources<\/a>. And, just last week, the NYT carried a front page story alleging that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/12\/09\/world\/europe\/vladimir-putin-russia-fake-news-hacking-cybersecurity.html?_r=1\" target=\"_blank\">Vladimir Putin<\/a>\u00a0was using <em>\u201ckompromat\u201d<\/em> to destroy the reputations of his political opponents. For <em>&#8216;proof&#8217;<\/em> they used the case of Vladimir Bukovsky, who was being investigated by British police over possession of child pornography.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">German politicians want \u20ac500k fines if Facebook fails to remove fake news within 24hrs <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/VSGNiA2M98\">https:\/\/t.co\/VSGNiA2M98<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/3YY4Dwk003\">pic.twitter.com\/3YY4Dwk003<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_com\/status\/810398321462378498?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 18, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>The paper&#8217;s readers were greeted with this soft-soap intro from correspondent Andrew Higgins: <em>\u201cHis indomitable will steeled by a dozen years in the Soviet gulag, decades of sparring with the K.G.B. and a bout of near fatal heart disease, Vladimir K. Bukovsky, a tireless opponent of Soviet leaders and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, is not a man easily put off his stride.\u201d<\/em> And to back up his yarn, Higgins made a series of unsubstantiated claims linking Russian state meddling to other similar schemes.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, sadly for Higgins &#8211; and Bukovsky, of course &#8211; his hero admitted a few days later that he actually collected the child porn <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/uk-england-cambridgeshire-38291431\" target=\"_blank\">images<\/a>\u00a0himself, as <em>&#8220;research.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Then there\u2019s the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2007\/dec\/21\/russia.topstories3\" target=\"_blank\">Guardian<\/a>, where its former Moscow correspondent Luke Harding has been alleging for years that Putin is the richest man in Europe, if not on earth. A statement that is frequently repeated in similar outlets, where his fortune &#8211; without any explanation &#8211; suddenly leaped from $40 billion to $200 billion recently, according to the same <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/worldviews\/wp\/2015\/02\/20\/is-vladimir-putin-hiding-a-200-billion-fortune-and-if-so-does-it-matter\/?utm_term=.d451e5374c72\">Washington Post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>These journals of renown base their figures on a single, very shaky, source. And we can\u2019t forget the Daily Telegraph, which appears to have given up on using professional journalists to cover Russia, and has produced some right porkies in recent times. Including outrageous stuff like Putin jetting to Switzerland, incognito, to oversee the birth of a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/worldnews\/vladimir-putin\/11471579\/Vladimir-Putins-girlfriend-has-given-birth.html\" target=\"_blank\">love child<\/a>\u00a0and Moscow developing a Star Trek-esque <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2016\/06\/22\/russia-aims-to-develop-teleportation-in-20-years\/\" target=\"_blank\">teleportation device<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Are all these not examples of <em>\u201cfake news?\u201d<\/em> But given that they are establishment names in the western press, don\u2019t expect Poynter to subject them to the same treatment as newer alternative outlets. And this is the problem with the entire exercise.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Credible or fake? Journalists clash in fiery RT debate on news sources in <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Syria?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Syria<\/a> (VIDEO) <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/ibunqPmH1V\">https:\/\/t.co\/ibunqPmH1V<\/a>   <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/qLtwXN45j7\">pic.twitter.com\/qLtwXN45j7<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RT America (@RT_America) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_America\/status\/810039334300749824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 17, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h2>Fragile Foundations<\/h2>\n<p>The list of signatories to the International <a href=\"http:\/\/www.poynter.org\/fact-checkers-code-of-principles\/\" target=\"_blank\">Fact-Checking<\/a>\u00a0Network also sets alarm bells ringing. For they include some fairly dubious organizations. Take <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/big-journalism\/2016\/12\/15\/9-reasons-politifact-unqualified-label-fake-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Politifact<\/a>, for example. This group has been accused of having a left-wing bias and openly favoring Clinton during the US election campaign. As Breitbart observed: <em>\u201cWhen Trump said Clinton wants \u201copen borders,\u201d PolitiFact deemed his statement \u201cmostly false\u201d \u2014 despite the fact that Clinton admitted as much in a private, paid speech to a Brazilian bank on May 16, 2013. \u201cMy dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders,\u201d she said at the time.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\u2018Intolerable &amp; dangerous\u2019: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Auschwitz?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Auschwitz<\/a> Committee accuses <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Facebook?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Facebook<\/a> of turning blind eye to hate speech <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/GGY63iSnbT\">https:\/\/t.co\/GGY63iSnbT<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YKcwlOujvk\">pic.twitter.com\/YKcwlOujvk<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; RT America (@RT_America) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_America\/status\/809786415445749764?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 16, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>There is no doubt that blatantly made up, let alone poorly fact-checked, stories are poisoning political discourse. And Facebook is right to tackle the type of companies who produce twaddle such as <em>\u201cHillary invented the Aids virus\u201d<\/em> or <em>\u201cTrump wants to distribute Mein Kampf to school kids&#8221;<\/em> or whatever nonsense is being pushed today.<\/p>\n<p>However, will it also censure <em>\u201crespected\u201d<\/em> mainstream outlets who allege that Putin has stolen $200 billion for himself or is planting child porn on dissidents?<\/p>\n<p>Because unless they are also labelled with the <em>\u201cfake news\u201d<\/em> badge, this looks more like an exercise in the US liberal establishment trying to gain control of the distribution of news on social media, as they once did with newspapers and broadcasters.<\/p>\n<p>Orwell might have called it a sort of <em>\u201cMinitrue.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook\u2019s &#8216;anti-fake news&#8217; plan looks like effort to curb alternative media<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60809\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}