ZeroHedge.com<\/p>\n
Moments ago, the Hollywood Reporter released the much anticipated Michael Wolff interview with Steve Bannon, the controversial president-elect’s chief strategist. As a preface, Wolff reveals that Bannon – unlike virtually anyone else in the “credible” media – predicted exactly how things would play out:<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nIn late summer when I went up to see Steve Bannon, recently named CEO of the Donald Trump presidential campaign, in his office at Trump Tower in New York, he outlined a preposterous-sounding scenario. Trump, he said, would do surprisingly well among women, Hispanics and African-Americans, in addition to working men, and hence take Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan \u2014 and therefore the election<\/strong>. On Nov. 15, when I went back to Trump Tower, Bannon, promoted by the president-elect to chief strategist for the incoming administration, and by the media as the official symbol of all things hateful and virulent about the coming Trump presidency, said, as matter-of-factly as when he first sketched it out for me, \u201cI told you so.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Perhaps Trump naming Bannon “chief strategist” is not a bad idea.<\/p>\n
Below we picked a few of the most notable excerpts from the interview, starting with Wolff’s description of what he saw on the day he visited Trump. He writes “the New York Times, in a widely circulated article<\/a>, will describe this day at Trump Tower as a scene of \u201cdisarray\u201d for the transition team<\/em>.” It appears the NYT was being a source of fake news again:<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n“In fact, it\u2019s all hands on: <\/strong>Mike Pence, the vice president-elect and transition chief, and Reince Priebus, the new chief of staff, shuttling between full conference rooms; Jared Kushner, Trump\u2019s son-in-law and by many accounts his closest advisor, conferring in the halls; Sen. Jeff Sessions in and out of meetings on the transition team floor; Rudy Giuliani upstairs with Trump (overheard: \u201cIs the boss meeting-meeting with Rudy or just shooting the shit?\u201d), and Bannon with a long line of men and women outside his corner office. If this is disarray, it\u2019s a peculiarly focused and organized kind.”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Why did Wolff pick Bannon as the subject of his interview: simple – he is the brains of the operations, the man whose job is to make the Trump regime “intellectually and historically coherent.”<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nThe focus on Bannon, if not necessarily the description, is right. He\u2019s the man with the idea<\/strong>. If Trumpism is to represent something intellectually and historically coherent, it\u2019s Bannon\u2019s job to make it so. In this, he could not be a less reassuring or more confusing figure for liberals \u2014 fiercely intelligent and yet reflexively drawn to the inverse of every liberal assumption and shibboleth. A working class kid, he enlists in the navy after high school, gets a degree from Virginia Tech, then Georgetown, then Harvard Business School. Then it\u2019s Goldman Sachs, then he\u2019s a dealmaker and entrepreneur in Hollywood \u2014 where, in an unlikely and very lucky deal match-up, he gets a lucrative piece of Seinfeld royalties, ensuring his own small fortune \u2014 then into the otherworld of the right wing conspiracy and conservative media<\/strong>. (He partners with David Bossie, a congressional investigator of President Clinton, who later spearheaded the Citizens United lawsuit that effectively removed the cap on campaign spending, and who now, as the deputy campaign manager, is in the office next to Bannon\u2019s.) And then to the Breitbart News Network, which with digital acumen and a mind-meld with the anger and the passion of the new alt-right (a liberal designation Bannon derides) he pushes to the inner circle of conservative media from Breitbart’s base on the west side of liberal Los Angeles.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Incidentally, Bannon appears to be a fan of “darkness”:<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u201cDarkness is good<\/strong>,\u201d says Bannon, who amid the suits surrounding him at Trump Tower, looks like a graduate student in his T-shirt, open button-down and tatty blue blazer \u2014 albeit a 62-year-old graduate student. \u201cDick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That\u2019s power. It only helps us when they\u2014\u201c I believe by \u201cthey\u201d he means liberals and the media, already promoting calls for his ouster \u201c\u2014get it wrong. When they\u2019re blind to who we are and what we\u2019re doing<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Bannon next discusses the “battle line” inside America’s great divide.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nHe absolutely \u2014 mockingly \u2014 rejects the idea that this is a racial line. \u201cI\u2019m not a white nationalist, I\u2019m a nationalist. I\u2019m an economic nationalist,<\/strong>\u201d he tells me. \u201cThe globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f\u2014ed over<\/strong>. If we deliver\u2014\u201d by “we” he means the Trump White House “\u2014we\u2019ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we\u2019ll govern for 50 years. That\u2019s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It\u2019s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Trump’s strategist views himself as a simple symbol: the “fall of the establishment.” He also slams the media: “The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what\u2019s wrong with this country….It\u2019s just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no f\u2014ing idea what\u2019s going on. If The New York Times didn\u2019t exist, CNN and MSNBC would be a test pattern.<\/strong>” He’s right.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nBannon represents, he not unreasonably believes, the fall of the establishment. The self-satisfied, in-bred and homogenous views of the establishment are both what he is against and what has provided the opening for the Trump revolution. \u201cThe media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what\u2019s wrong with this country<\/strong>,\u201d he continues. \u201cIt\u2019s just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no f\u2014ing idea what\u2019s going on. If The New York Times didn\u2019t exist, CNN and MSNBC would be a test pattern. The Huffington Post and everything else is predicated on The New York Times. It\u2019s a closed circle of information from which Hillary Clinton got all her information \u2014 and her confidence. That was our opening.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Bannon’s vision: an “entirely new political movement”, one which drives the conservatives crazy. As to how monetary policy will coexist with fiscal stimulus, Bannon has a simple explanation: he plans to “rebuild everything” courtesy of negative interest rates and cheap debt throughout the world. Those rates may not be negative for too long.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u201cLike [Andrew] Jackson\u2019s populism, we\u2019re going to build an entirely new political movement<\/strong>,\u201d he says. \u201cIt\u2019s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I\u2019m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it\u2019s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We\u2019re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks<\/strong>. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution \u2014 conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
How Bannon describes Trump: “an ideal vessel”<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nIt is less than obvious how Bannon, now the official strategic brains of the Trump operation, syncs with his boss, famously not too strategic. When Bannon took over the campaign from Paul Manafort, there were many in the Trump circle who had resigned themselves to the inevitability of the candidate listening to no one<\/strong>. But here too was a Bannon insight: When the campaign seemed most in free fall or disarray, it was perhaps most on target. While Clinton was largely absent from the campaign trail and concentrating on courting her donors, Trump \u2014 even after the leak of the grab-them-by-the-pussy audio \u2014 was speaking to ever-growing crowds of thirty-five or forty thousand. \u201cHe gets it, he gets it intuitively,\u201d says Bannon, perhaps still surprised he has found such an ideal vessel. \u201cYou have probably the greatest orator since William Jennings Bryan, coupled with an economic populist message and two political parties that are so owned by the donors that they don\u2019t speak to their audience. But he speaks in a non-political vernacular, he communicates with these people in a very visceral way. <\/strong>Nobody in the Democratic party listened to his speeches, so they had no idea he was delivering such a compelling and powerful economic message. He shows up 3.5 hours late in Michigan at 1 in the morning and has 35,000 people waiting in the cold. When they got [Clinton] off the donor circuit she went to Temple University and they drew 300 or 400 kids.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Bannon on Murdoch: “Rupert is a globalist and never understood Trump”<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nAt that moment, as we talk, there\u2019s a knock on the door of Bannon’s office, a temporary, impersonal, middle-level executive space with a hodgepodge of chairs for constant impromptu meetings. Sen. Ted Cruz, once the Republican firebrand, now quite a small and unassuming figure, has been waiting patiently for a chat and Bannon excuses himself for a short while. It is clear when we return to our conversation that it is not just the liberal establishment that Bannon feels he has triumphed over, but the conservative one too \u2014 not least of all Fox News and its owners, the Murdochs. \u201cThey got it more wrong than anybody,\u201d he says. \u201cRupert is a globalist and never understood Trump. To him, Trump is a radical. Now they\u2019ll go centrist and build the network around Megyn Kelly.\u201d <\/strong>Bannon recounts, with no small irony, that when Breitbart attacked Kelly after her challenges to Trump in the initial Republican debate, Fox News chief Roger Ailes \u2014 whom Bannon describes as an important mentor, and who Kelly\u2019s accusations of sexual harassment would help topple in July \u2014 called to defend her. Bannon says he warned Ailes that Kelly would be out to get him too<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Finally, Bannon on how he sees himself in the administration:<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nBannon now becomes part of a two-headed White House political structure, with Reince Priebus \u2014 in and out of Bannon’s office as we talk \u2014 as chief of staff, in charge of making the trains run on time, reporting to the president, and Bannon as chief strategist, in charge of vision, goals, narrative and plan of attack, reporting to the president too. Add to this the ambitions and whims of the president himself, and the novel circumstance of one who has never held elective office, the agenda of his highly influential family and the end runs of a party significant parts of which were opposed to him, and you have quite a complex court that Bannon will have to finesse to realize his reign of the working man and a trillion dollars in new spending.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201cI am,\u201d he says, with relish, \u201cThomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.\u201d <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Perhaps that was a Freudian slip: Cromwell’s end under Henry VIII was not a happy one<\/a>.<\/p>\n