WRITTEN BY: JD HEYES<\/p>\n
(Trump.news<\/a>) A vote for Donald Trump for president will likely mean a lot of things: A rejection of Hillary Clinton, likely for the last time (politically, at least); a belief that Trump definitely will revitalize an economy that President Obama will leave on life support; confidence that he\u2019ll really begin putting America first<\/em>, among other things. But a vote for Trump \u2013 and an eventual Trump victory<\/a> \u2013 may also mean that, for the first time, we\u2019ll have a president who takes seriously the danger aggressive vaccine schedules pose to our children.<\/p>\n As many already know, during the Republican primaries Trump was the first and only candidate to bring up the reported link between MMR vaccines and increased rates of autism.<\/p>\n As NaturalNews <\/em>reported in October 2015<\/a>, Trump \u2013 a full year earlier \u2013 tweeted that \u201ctiny children are not horses\u201d and that they should be given \u201cno more massive injections,\u201d that vaccines should be \u201cone at a time, over time.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI am being proven right about massive vaccinations \u2013 the doctors lied. Save our children & their future,\u201d he said in another tweet.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m not against vaccinations for your children, I\u2019m against them in 1 massive dose. Spread them out over a period of time & autism will drop!\u201d he said in another, followed by, \u201cSo many people who have children with autism have thanked me \u2013 amazing response. They know far better than fudged up reports!\u201d<\/p>\n By contrast, Trump\u2019s likely Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton<\/a>, has voiced only tepid opposition to Big Pharma, which proved to be completely meaningless after news broke that she had accepted more campaign contributions from pharmaceutical companies<\/a> than any of the other Democratic or Republican candidates (in the race at the time).<\/p>\n Trump, of course, came under attack from the mainstream media and mainstream medicine for his stance, especially during a debate sponsored by CNN<\/em>. Debate moderators tried a \u201cgotcha\u201d question with him<\/a>, but he answered it brilliantly \u2013 and correctly:<\/p>\n Autism has become an epidemic<\/a>\u2026 Because you take a baby in, and I\u2019ve seen it, and I\u2019ve seen it, and I had my children taken care of, over a long period of time, over a two or three year period of time, same exact amount, but you take this little beautiful baby, and you pump \u2013<\/b> I mean, it looks just like it\u2019s meant for a horse, not for a child, and we\u2019ve had so many instances, people that work for me, just the other day, two-years-old, two-and-a-half-years-old, a child, a beautiful child went to have the vaccine, and came back, and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic. \u2026I\u2019m in favor of vaccines [but] do them over a longer period of time, same amount, but just in little sections. I think you\u2019re going to have \u2013<\/b> I think you\u2019re going to see a big impact on autism.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Who agreed with him? Only both of the physicians who were on stage with him<\/strong> that night, retired neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson and Sen. Rand Paul,<\/a> an ophthalmologist.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are probably giving way too many in too short a period of time\u2026\u201d Carson said when moderators threw the question to him.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m all for vaccines, but I\u2019m also for freedom. I\u2019m concerned about how they\u2019re bunched up<\/strong>\u2026 I ought to have the right to spread out the vaccines a little bit,\u201d Paul noted.<\/p>\n As for Trump\u2019s initial vaccine-autism tweets, as we noted he made them just hours after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report nothing that autism rates spiked 30 percent <\/strong>among American children in 2012 and 2013:<\/p>\n The report revealed that one in 68 U.S. children had autism in 2014; whereas in 2012, only one in 88 U.S. children had autism. The report claims it was not designed to determine the cause behind the recent spike in autism rates.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As early as 2012, Trump appeared on TV to rail against what he called \u201cmonster vaccines\u201d linked to autism.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve gotten to be pretty familiar with the subject. You know, I have a theory, and it\u2019s a theory that some people believe in, and that\u2019s the vaccinations. We never had anything like this. This is now an epidemic. It\u2019s way, way up over the past 10 years. It\u2019s way up over the past two years,\u201d he told Fox News<\/em>, as we reported<\/a>.<\/p>\n When told his views were outside the mainstream, Trump said: \u201c\u2026 I couldn\u2019t care less,\u201d adding, \u201cI\u2019ve seen people where they have a perfectly healthy child, and they go for the vaccinations and a month later the child is no longer healthy.\u201d<\/p>\n Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n NaturalNews.com<\/a><\/p>\n NaturalNews.com<\/a><\/p>\n