Whereas Barack Obama did promise the USA ‘Hope and Change<\/em>‘, the real change that he is likely to experience has no historical precedence in US history. The inevitable revolution being waged by the states \u2014 at the insistence of their citizens \u2014 does not ignore the impelling influences by the previous Bush Administration. Back-to-back despotic and rogue administrations served to show the American people just how far the political class has fallen. \u00a0It is now quite clear, to virtually everyone concerned, that there is no hope for their \u2018brand\u2019 of leadership, and therefore no lasting and much needed change can be expected under their watch.<\/p>\n For those who comprehend the defining moment at hand, it is still premature to celebrate. \u00a0The politicos and powerbrokers, corporate titans and business magnates, financiers and bankers, lawyers and lobbyists, will do everything in their power to subvert the upcoming process of realignment. \u00a0They will do everything in their power to sabotage the originally conceived\u00a0Constitutional Republic<\/em>\u00a0from taking shape. \u00a0They will seek to disempower both the states and people, as they have always done. \u00a0Therefore\u00a0\u2014> From TRN News:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The most important political development in 200 years was triggered last week, when the state legislature of Michigan became the 34 th state to demand a “Constitutional Convention” in the United States. Under Article 5 of the US Constitution, if 2\/3rds of the states call for such a convention, (meaning 34 states) it MUST take place. During such a convention, the ENTIRE Constitution can be changed; nothing is off-limits. This would even allow the States to dismantle the federal government without its consent, and repudiate the debt which that government has incurred! When it voted for the convention last week, Michigan became the 34 th state, thus meeting the requirement.<\/p>\n A goal has been reached behind what would be an unprecedented effort to amend the U.S. Constitution, through a little-known provision that gives states rather than Congress the power to initiate changes. This [may be] the most significant political development in the entire world in the last 200 years.<\/p>\n At issue is what’s known as a “constitutional convention,” a scenario tucked into Article V of the U.S. Constitution. At its core, Article V provides two ways for amendments to be proposed. The first \u2013 which has been used for all 27 amendments to date \u2013 requires two-thirds of both the House and Senate to approve a resolution, before sending it to the states for ratification. The Founding Fathers, though, devised an alternative way which says if two-thirds of state legislatures demand a meeting, Congress \u201cshall call a convention for proposing amendments.\u201d<\/p>\n The idea has gained popularity among constitutional scholars in recent years — but got a big boost last week when Michigan lawmakers endorsed it.<\/p>\n Michigan matters, because by some counts it was the 34th state to do so. That makes two-thirds.<\/p>\n In the wake of the vote, California Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter pressed House Speaker John Boehner on today to determine whether the states just crossed the threshold for this kind of convention. Like Michigan lawmakers, Hunter’s interest in the matter stems from a desire to push a balanced-budget amendment — something that could be done at a constitutional convention.<\/p>\n \u201cBased on several reports and opinions, Michigan is the 34thstate to issue such a call and therefore presents the constitutionally-required number of states to begin the process of achieving a balanced budget amendment,\u201d Hunter wrote.<\/p>\n \u201cWith the recent decision by Michigan lawmakers, it is important that the House \u2013 and those of us who support a balanced budget amendment — determine whether the necessary number of states have acted and the appropriate role of Congress should this be the case.”<\/p>\n If two-thirds of the states have indeed applied, the ball is presumably in Congress’ court to call the convention.<\/p>\n But Article V is rather vague, and it’s ultimately unclear whether 34 states have technically applied. In the past, states like Oregon, Utah and Arizona have quietly voted to approve the provision in their legislature.<\/p>\n But some of the 34 or so have rescinded their requests. Others have rescinded, and then re-applied.<\/p>\n Alabama rescinded its request in 1988 but in 2011, lawmakers again applied for a convention related to an amendment requiring that the federal budget be balanced. It was a similar story in Florida in 2010.<\/p>\n Louisiana rescinded in 1990 but lawmakers have tried several times, unsuccessfully, to reinstate the application since then.<\/p>\n It’s unclear whether the applications still count in these scenarios.<\/p>\n Some constitutional scholars like Gregory Watson, an analyst in Texas, say once states ask, there may be no take-backs.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is a disagreement among scholars as to whether a state that has approved an application may later rescind that application,\u201d Watson told The Washington Times. \u201cIf it is ultimately adjudicated that a state may not rescind a prior application, then Ohio\u2019s 2013 application for a Balanced Budget Amendment convention would be the 33 rd and Michigan\u2019s 2014 application would be the 34th on that topic.\u201d<\/p>\n Others say if a state changes its mind, it can no longer be part of the 34.<\/p>\n Even if the requisite number of states have applied, questions remain about how such a convention would work — and whether, as Michigan wants, such a convention could be limited to only discussing a balanced-budget amendment.<\/p>\n It still may be a long shot, but some analysts are warning about the unintended consequences of such a move.<\/p>\n In Louisiana, Budget Project Policy Analyst Steve Spire argued against the state’s resolution, saying the convention could permanently damage the nation\u2019s political system. What he calls “damage” others call improvement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n Conclusion:<\/p>\n The USA now finds itself at a critical moment of the American Experiment<\/em>. Since the 2000 election of George W. Bush, the divisions between red and blue states have never been so wide and deep. The socio-economic conflicts, political acrimony and philosophical arguments between people of different political persuasions and religious stripes are as intense and irreconcilable as ever. \u00a0Given this volatile state of affairs, there must be a new forum in which to rationally discuss and objectively debate the future of the nation.<\/p>\n To our thinking, a full blown Constitutional Convention may be the only way out of the current political paralysis. Where such a forum may be exploited by those with selfish and\/or narrow interests, the states can act as a gatekeeper to ensure proper and proportionate representation. At the end of the day, the people must be represented in full force, or else such a convention will be an unsuccessful exercise in futility.<\/p>\n Now the challenge will be to determine how to hold a conference in an ‘unbiased’ location. Or, maybe through a digital format using all the tools available on the internet to keep the dialogue flowing and open to all US citizens. In this way, the corporate media cannot screen out their own prejudiced problems areas or filter in their favorite biases. They are already guilty of giving very little reporting to such an important and historic opportunity, which has emerged from the constitutional crisis they \u00a0shamelessly helped to create.<\/p>\n Perhaps the time has come for the USA to assume the form of constitutional republic that it\u00a0was designed to be. \u00a0Although this nation purports to export ‘freedom and democracy’ around the world, our brand of democracy has become totalitarian in nature vacillating between fascism and communism, relentlessly bogged down in political correctness, and administered by leadership that is perennially addicted to deception.<\/p>\n Clearly, the time has come for a renewed form of governance and political economy which truly serve the citizenry; not the other way around.<\/p>\n Michael Thomas \u00a9 2014 State of the Nation SOMETHING HUGE JUST HAPPENED AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS IGNORING IT The following news alert conveys what is perhaps the most important development in these United States of America this year \u2026 this decade \u2026 this millennium. \u00a0Truly, it does … Continue reading
\n<\/strong><\/p>\nBe Aware, and Beware,
\nof the wolves in sheep\u2019s clothing!<\/strong><\/em><\/h2>\n![\"Screen](\"http:\/\/www.storyleak.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Screen-Shot-2014-05-04-at-10.13.42-AM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\nMay 4, 2014
\nStateoftheNation2012.com<\/a><\/p>\n
\nPermission is granted to post this essay as long as it is linked back to the following url:
\nhttps:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=5171<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"