{"id":51122,"date":"2016-10-04T17:44:36","date_gmt":"2016-10-04T21:44:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=51122"},"modified":"2016-10-04T17:44:58","modified_gmt":"2016-10-04T21:44:58","slug":"clinton-foundation-allegedly-hacked-exposing-thousands-of-donor-databases-pay-to-play-folder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=51122","title":{"rendered":"Clinton Foundation Allegedly Hacked Exposing Thousands Of Donor Databases; “Pay To Play” Folder"},"content":{"rendered":"

ZeroHedge.com<\/p>\n

\n
\n

While the hack of the Clinton Foundation was foreshadowed <\/a>two months ago, moments ago notorious hacker Gufficer 2.0<\/a>, who previously was responsible for hacking the DNC and DNCC not to mention the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Shultz, announced that the moment “many of you have been waiting for” <\/em>has come, by revealing that the Clinton Foundation has been hacked.<\/p>\n

This is what Guccifer 2.0, who has denied being affiliated with the Russian government claiming that like the original Guccifer he is from Romania, posted moments ago on his website<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors\u2019 databases.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Hillary Clinton and her staff don\u2019t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The unknown hacker has allegedly exposed 1,000 of Hillary donors (a small list of master donors can be found here<\/a>)…<\/p>\n

\"Guccifer\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

…corporate donations made to various House representatives<\/a>….<\/p>\n

\"Guccifer\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

…as well as Wall Street bank donations<\/a>, curiously cross-referenced to how much TARP funding they received.<\/p>\n

\"Guccifer\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

As Guccifer notes,” It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

Guccifer 2.0 also posted a note to Julian Assange who was mocked on Tuesday morning after he failed to produce Clinton documents he has long claimed to have.<\/p>\n

\u201cP.S. I\u2019m pleased to congratulate Wikileaks on their 10th anniversary!!!,\u201d Guccifer 2.0 writes. \u201cJulian, you are really cool! Stay safe and sound!”<\/p>\n

* * *<\/p>\n

But the most interesting, and perhaps damning, finding is the following: a root directory snapshot revealing a folder which Hillary may have some trouble explaining: “Pay to Play<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

\"Guccifer\"<\/p>\n

The hacker also provides a link to the hundreds of thousands of other documents he has access to saying “I can\u2019t post all databases here for they\u2019re too large. I\u2019m looking for a better way to release them now.”<\/em><\/p>\n

We will go through the files, with a focus on Pay to Play because this may be the clearest confirmation that after repeated accusations that the Clinton Foundation was primarily a conduit for rich donors to get access to privileged kickbacks, or well “pay to play”, this was indeed the case, although the fact that someone actually left a folder with that name in the foundation’s server makes us wonder if someone is really that stupid, or whether this hack is even real.<\/p>\n

To be sure, as The Hill notes<\/a>, some of the files contained in the leaked data dump appear to originate not from the Foundation but from the DNCC:<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

A sampling of the posted documents include a spreadsheet of big bank donations, a list of primarily California donors, an outdated spreadsheet of some Republican House members \u2014 and a screenshot of files he claimed to have obtained, one of which was titled \u201cPay to Play.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

But there are a number of red flags that suggest the documents are in fact from a previous hack on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), not a new hack on the Clinton Foundation.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A spot check of some of the people on the donor list against FEC filings found that they all lined up with DCCC contributions.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Clinton Foundation discloses its donors, and many of the alleged donors published by Guccifer 2.0 do not appear to have given to the organization.<\/p>\n

One spreadsheet was allegedly created by a Kevin C. McKeon at DCCC in 2009. There was a Kevin McKeon that worked at DCCC at that time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Clinton Foundation has denied the hack, with president Donna Shalala saying that \u201cnone of the files or folders shown are ours.”<\/p>\n

\n

No evidence of a #Guccifer<\/a> hack at @ClintonFdn<\/a>, no notification by law enforcement, and none of the files or folders shown are ours.<\/p>\n

— Donna E. Shalala (@DonnaShalala) October 4, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n