\n
\n
<\/p>\n
By Matt Patterson<\/p>\n
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. \u00a0How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?<\/p>\n
Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions. \u00a0He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.<\/p>\n
And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor.\u00a0\u00a0It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?<\/p>\n
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the\u00a0Wall Street Journal<\/a>:<\/p>\n To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against\u00a0various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass — held to a lower standard — because of the color of his skin.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>Podhoretz continues:<\/p>\n And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon — affirmative action. \u00a0Not in the legal sense, of course. \u00a0But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back.\u00a0 Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.\u00a0 Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. \u00a0Yes, racist.\u00a0\u00a0Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin — that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.\u00a0\u00a0And that is what America did to Obama.<\/p>\n True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? \u00a0As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. \u00a0All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.\u00a0 What could this breed if not the sort of empty \u00a0narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?<\/p>\n In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.\u00a0\u00a0Those people — conservatives included — ought now to be deeply embarrassed.\u00a0\u00a0The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clich\u00e9s, and that’s when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.\u00a0 Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth — it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.<\/p>\n And what about his character?\u00a0\u00a0Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.\u00a0\u00a0Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.\u00a0\u00a0It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.\u00a0\u00a0But really, what were we to expect?\u00a0\u00a0The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?<\/p>\n In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.\u00a0\u00a0When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense.\u00a0\u00a0It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.<\/p>\n But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while.\u00a0\u00a0And really, isn’t that all that matters these days?<\/p>\n See also: The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events<\/a><\/p>\n Update:<\/p>\n Author’s Note<\/strong>. \u00a0A lot of readers have written in asking me how I came to\u00a0the\u00a0conclusion\u00a0that\u00a0Obama\u00a0was an unremarkable student and that he benefited from affirmative action. \u00a0Three reasons:<\/p>\n 1) \u00a0As reported by The New York Sun<\/a>:<\/em>\u00a0“A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors…” \u00a0In spite of not receiving honors as an undergrad,\u00a0Obama\u00a0was nevertheless\u00a0admitted\u00a0to\u00a0Harvard\u00a0Law. \u00a0Why?<\/p>\n