![\"Chilcot\"](\"http:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Chilcot-400x225.jpg\" "\\"Chilcot\\"")
<\/div>\nSundus Saleh, an Iraqi woman, first filed her lawsuit against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice and Paul Wolfowitz in September 2013. Alleging that the Iraq War constituted an illegal crime of aggression, Saleh filed the suit on behalf of herself and other Iraqis in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.<\/em><\/p>\n The district court dismissed Saleh\u2019s lawsuit in December 2014, saying the defendants acted within the scope of their employment when they planned and carried out the Iraq War. Saleh then appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.<\/p>\n In her appeal, Saleh is arguing that the Bush officials were acting from personally held convictions that\u00a0the US should invade Iraq, regardless of any legitimate policy reasons, and that theyknowingly lied to the public when they fraudulently tied Saddam Hussein to al-Qaeda and the threat of weapons of mass destruction.<\/strong><\/p>\n Inder Comar, Saleh\u2019s lawyer, explained, \u201cNuremberg held that domestic immunity was not a defense to allegations of international aggression. Everything the Germans did was legal under the law. We are asking the Ninth Circuit to reject the application of domestic immunity in this case, in line with the holdings of Nuremberg.\u201d<\/p>\n On July 22, Saleh urged the Ninth Circuit to take judicial notice of portions of\u00a0the Chilcot Report, which makes factual conclusions<\/a>\u00a0about the run-up to the Iraq War. A court can take judicial notice of a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute and can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned. That includes public records, such as reports issued by a commission of inquiry.<\/p>\n The report was published by the Iraq Inquiry Committee, an independent committee established by the British government, on July 6, 2016, after six years of investigation, research and drafting.<\/p>\n Here are four of the\u00a0excerpts from the report<\/a>\u00a0that Saleh has submitted to the court for judicial notice:<\/p>\n 24. President Bush decided at the end of 2001 to pursue a policy of regime change in Iraq.<\/p>\n 68. On 26 February, 2002, Sir Richard Dearlove, the Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service, advised that the US Administration had concluded that containment would not work, was drawing up plans for a military campaign later in the year, and was considering presenting Saddam Hussein with an ultimatum for the return of inspectors while setting the bar \u201cso high that Saddam Hussein would be unable to comply.\u201d<\/p>\n 74 Mr. [UK Foreign Secretary Jack] Straw\u2019s advice of 25 March proposed that the US and UK should seek an ultimatum to Saddam Hussein to re-admit weapons inspectors. That would provide a route for the UK to align itself with the US without adopting the US objective regime change. This reflected advice that regime change would be unlawful.<\/p>\n 89. Sir Richard Dearlove reported that he had been told that the US had already taken a decision on action \u2013 \u201cthe question was only how and when;\u201d and that he had been told it intended to set the threshold on weapons inspections so high that Iraq would not be able to hold up US policy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The report includes copies of notes between Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in which they discussed the invasion of Iraq as early as October 2001.<\/p>\n Eight months before the invasion of Iraq, Blair wrote to Bush, saying \u201cI will be with you, whatever.\u201d In July 2002, Blair had told Bush that removing Hussein from power would \u201cfree up the region\u201d even though Iraqis might \u201cfeel ambivalent about being invaded.\u201d<\/p>\n