![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/var\/ezflow_site\/storage\/images\/media\/content\/2014\/03-25estorms\/18254001-1-eng-US\/03-25estorms_full_600.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nBy\u00a0Randy Dotinga\u00a0\/ March 28, 2014<\/p>\n
‘Earthquake Storms’ is by John Dvorak.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Now\u00a0that\u00a0was a wake-up call.<\/p>\n
On March 17, a mild earthquake rattled countless\u00a0Los Angeles<\/a>-area residents awake shortly before their alarms went off at 6:30 a.m. The Monday morning temblor was the first notable L.A.-area quake in years.<\/p>\n A lengthy vacation from earthquakes certainly sounds nice. But\u00a0John Dvorak<\/a>, a geophysicist who now works at a astronomical observatory in\u00a0Hawaii<\/a>, warns that a quake break can just be the calm before the earthquake storm.<\/p>\n Are you a sophisticated reader? Take the quiz<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n He makes his case that the Golden State is in for trouble in his readable and aptly named new book “Earthquake Storms: The Fascinating History and Volatile Future of the San Andreas Fault.”<\/p>\n But it’s not just Californians who should pay attention to his exploration of earthquake science, the unfolding mysteries of geology, and the gaps in our seismic knowledge.<\/p>\n As he notes in an interview, plenty of other parts of the country are vulnerable to earthquakes, including the Northwest, the Midwest, the South and \u2013 yes \u2013 eventhe Big Apple<\/a>.<\/p>\n Q: Scientists weren’t just wrong about earthquakes in the centuries leading up to the 1906\u00a0San Francisco<\/a>\u00a0quake. They were\u00a0really\u00a0wrong. What did they believe?<\/b><\/p>\n A: If you go back to the Enlightenment, they thought they were related to chemical explosions. By the 19th century, many scientists said they were caused by large volcanic explosions happening within the Earth. \u00a0<\/p>\n There was no wide acceptance of the idea that earthquakes were actually caused by the sliding of great crustal blocks against each other until the 1906 earthquake, which ruptured the earth’s surface for almost 300 miles. The ground had actually slid tens of feet along that rupture.<\/p>\n Q: Earthquakes can happen when giant chunks of land relieve the pressure that builds as they press against each other. You write that this is akin to what happens to a railroad car when it’s pushed.<\/b><\/p>\n Could you explain that?<\/b><\/p>\n A: Imagine you’re in a railroad car with the brakes on. It’s getting pushed by another car, but it won’t slide because of the brakes.<\/p>\n Eventually, however, the friction is overcome and the wheels start to slide on the iron rails. This makes the whole car shudder.<\/p>\n Another way to look at it is to put your hands palm down on a table and try to slide it. It only goes in little jerks.<\/p>\n Q: What is an “earthquake storm”?<\/b><\/p>\n A: During the last few decades, it has been realized that earthquakes do not occur randomly, nor do they occur like clockwork.<\/p>\n Instead, earthquakes, even large ones, tend to cluster in time and space. An earthquake storm is when there is a cluster of large earthquakes in a region occur over a period of several decades.<\/p>\n The best examples are the earthquakes that are now happening in northern Turkey along the North Anatolian fault.<\/p>\n The storm began in 1939. Since then there have been 13 major earthquakes, and scientists expect at least one more major earthquake is yet to happen at the west end near\u00a0Istanbul<\/a>. So the Turkish government is trying to retrofit many buildings for the coming shaking as well as protect many of the art treasures in the city and much of the ancient architecture.<\/p>\n Q: What does that mean for quakes in our lifetimes?<\/b><\/p>\n A: The last major earthquake to strike Istanbul was in 1509. \u00a0The next one is expected in the next few decades.<\/p>\n There is also an earthquake storm happening at the eastern end of the Indian Ocean. It began in 2001 with a magnitude-7.9 event and includes the disastrous December 2004 earthquake that struck Sumatra. In total, there have been seven major earthquakes there since 2001, and at least a few more are expected.<\/p>\n Q: How does\u00a0California<\/a>\u00a0fit into the world of earthquake storms?<\/b><\/p>\n A: Most of the motion between the Pacific and North American plates occurs along coastal California. In the last hundred years, there has been only one significant earthquake along those plates: the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, also known as the World Series earthquake.<\/p>\n But during the previous hundred years before that, there were five significant earthquakes along the California coast, in 1812, 1838, 1857, 1868, and 1906.<\/p>\n Large earthquakes are the major means by which seismic energy gets released after building up between the two tectonic plates. And so one or more large earthquakes are in California\u2019s future. It is a matter of when.<\/p>\n Q: A few years ago, I\u00a0interviewed<\/a>\u00a0the authors of a book about a destructive 7.3-magnitude earthquake in\u00a0Charleston, S.C.<\/a>\u00a0The 1886 quake not only destroyed buildings but also managed to worsen race relations.<\/b><\/p>\n Where else do people face earthquake risks in the US outside of California?<\/b><\/p>\n A: Alaska is the most seismically active place in the\u00a0United States<\/a>, followed by California. In third place is Utah, fourth is Hawaii. And there is a big seismic potential in the Pacific Northwest.<\/p>\n There is also the New\u00a0Madrid<\/a>\u00a0area in southeast\u00a0Missouri<\/a>\u00a0where a series of four major earthquakes struck in 1811 and 1812. A repeat of those events will cause major damage in Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi and Arkansas.<\/p>\n There’s also New York and\u00a0New England<\/a>. The largest historic earthquake in New York occurred beneath New York Harbor in 1884. It was felt along most of the East Coast. The largest New England earthquake occurred in 1755 off the coast at\u00a0Cape Ann<\/a>.<\/p>\n It is still a mystery why earthquakes occur in these areas.<\/p>\n Q: What’s next for earthquake research?<\/b><\/p>\n A: The most crucial question to be answered is: What triggers a large earthquake? There are two opinions about this, and it is hotly debated by seismologists.<\/p>\n One theory says all earthquakes begin the same.<\/p>\n Small earthquakes are popping off all the time in California. If a large earthquake is just a small earthquake that grows to a huge size \u2013 say, by a cascade of many, many small earthquakes \u2013 then there is no hope that large earthquakes will ever be predicted. If so, we will never be able to do anything better than provide probabilities of future earthquakes.<\/p>\n The other theory say the beginning of a large earthquake is fundamentally different from small earthquakes. If so, then large earthquakes might be predicted.<\/p>\n Q: Many Americans don’t live in quake zones but may travel to them and encounter a quake. Other folks \u2013 like me! \u2013 live in quake areas but haven’t kept up on the latest advice about what to do when a big one hits.<\/b><\/p>\n Can you give us a quick refresher course in a sentence or two?<\/b><\/p>\n A: Stay put. Duck, cover, and hold on.<\/p>\n Randy Dotinga is a Monitor contributor.<\/p>\n