![\"The](\"http:\/\/www.thecommonsenseshow.com\/siteupload\/2016\/08\/clinton-in-trouble-2-300x168.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
The Clinton campaign is in deep trouble.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The Clinton campaign is falling apart. Last night my wife was watching a local station and they were doing a political analysis show with so-called experts. My wife told me she had paused the show so I could watch and I muttered something about the fact that I would rather do the laundry, mow the law and wash all of our clothes, but I gave in at her insistence.<\/p>\n
I was dumbstruck by what I saw. A TV station straight out of the MSM boldly stating that at the present time, Clinton does not engender the trust needed to get elected. In fact, they said that barring a dramatic turn-around, Clinton cannot win, regardless of what the polls are sayiing. In fact, one analyst said that the CNN poll showing Clinton was holding a seven point lead was fiction. They pointed to the fact that\u00a0the most recent LA Times poll showed that the race was a dead heat.<\/p>\n
The analysts said she has the email problem, the Benghazi problem and now allegations have surfaced about the Clinton Foundation\u2019s \u201cpay for play\u201d regarding arms deals with terrorist-supporting states.<\/p>\n
The analysts took their shots at Trump, and they did not go far enough into the criminality of Clinton, but needless to say I was in shock due to the fact that so much truth was revealed in an MSM presentation.<\/p>\n
The Clinton campaign is falling apart and here are some hard and fast markers in support of this statement.<\/p>\n
Finally, a Statistically Valid\u00a0Election Poll<\/h2>\n
In previous articles, I have been highly critical regarding the methodology employed by the MSM in determinging that Clinton held a 10 point lead. The randomization, or lack thereof, is a key component on why the MSM polls are not to be believed. \u00a0If you interview a sample with 80% of the participatnts being Democrats, you are going to get a 10% Clinton lead. If you interview mostly unemployed people, the same results will occur. But in terms of predicting HONEST election results, these polls are not worth the paper they are written on. Further, the small sample sizes for many of these polls is too small to form a generalized conclusion about America as a whole.<\/p>\n
One poll was conducted which did randomly select an equal number of voters in each part with an equal number of independent voters. The results are stunning and this poll maintained the statistical rigor to form generalizing conclusions about the true nature of the political feelings in thsi country.<\/p>\n
\n