\u201cWe believe that this mural is offensive because of the depiction of a near-naked woman, not on the basis of disrespect to Hillary Clinton, and it is not in keeping with our stance on gender equity<\/strong>,\u201d the council chief executive, Stephen Wall, said. \u201cWe contacted Victoria police to provide their opinion on the matter, and they deemed the mural to be offensive<\/strong> and in contravention of the Graffiti Prevention Act 2007, which [the] council is responsible for enforcing.\u201d<\/p>\n The local artist, known as Lushlux, was threatened with prosecution and fines if he did not remove the mural. He complied, but not quite as expected by the local bureaucrats.<\/p>\n In an ironic turn of events, Lushlux decided to depict Hillary wearing a burqa, and left a message for the ultra PC, hyper-sensitive government folks. \u201cIf this Muslim woman offends u, u r a bigot, racist, sexist Islamophobe.\u201d<\/strong> Be careful what you wish for…<\/p>\n We assume this new mural depiction would flatter Hillary, as Islam is a religion of peace. <\/a>Or maybe not: On Wednesday, the wall had been painted completely black.<\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/zerohedge.com\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/user5\/imageroot\/2016\/07\/21\/hillary%20mural_0.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n