by Richard Pollock
\nThe Daily Caller<\/p>\n
IRS Commissioner John Koskinen\u00a0referred congressional charges<\/a> of corrupt Clinton Foundation \u201cpay-to-play\u201d activities to his tax agency\u2019s exempt operations office for investigation, <\/strong>The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.<\/p>\n The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of \u201cpublic corruption\u201d was made in a July 15 letter<\/a> by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is\u00a0\u201clawless<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn<\/strong>, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside\u00a0the IRS.<\/strong><\/p>\n The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a \u201clawless \u2018pay-to-play\u2019 enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Koskinen\u2019s July 22 reply came only a week after the House Republicans contacted the tax agency. It\u00a0arrived to their offices Monday, the first opening day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have forwarded the information you have submitted to our Exempt Organizations Program in Dallas,\u201d<\/strong><\/em> Koskinen told the Republicans.<\/p>\n The Exempt Organization Program is the division of the IRS that\u00a0regulates the operations of public foundations and charities.\u00a0It\u2019s the same division that was led by former IRS official Lois Lerner<\/strong> when hundreds of conservative, evangelical and tea party non-profit applicants were illegally targeted and harassed by tax officials.<\/p>\n Blackburn told TheDCNF she believes the IRS has a double standard because,<\/strong> \u201cthey would go after conservative groups and religious groups and organizations, but they wouldn\u2019t be looking at the Clinton Foundation for years.\u00a0It was as if they choose who they are going to audit and question. It\u2019s not right.\u201d<\/p>\n Blackburn said she and her colleagues will \u201ccontinue to push\u201d for answers on the Clinton Foundation\u2019s governing policies, including its insular board of directors. She said they also will examine conflicts of interest and \u201cfollow the money trail.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cIn my opinion, there\u2019s a lack of good governance, there is the appearance of conflicts of interest, and there are continued questions about the financial dealings,\u201d<\/strong><\/em> she told TheDCNF.<\/p>\n House Republicans singled out Laureate Education<\/a> and Uranium One as two companies that seemed to have paid lavish sums to the Clintons and later received official government benefits.<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n Laureate hired former President Bill Clinton as \u201chonorary chancellor,\u201d paying him $16.5 million over five years. The Baltimore-based company, which operates for-profit universities in 28 countries, also donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the foundation\u2019s web site.<\/p>\n While Bill was collecting a paycheck from the company and his wife was secretary of state, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), an arm of the World Bank, invested $150 million in Laureate.\u00a0It was the largest-ever single IFC investment to\u00a0an educational company. The United States government is the largest contributor to the IFC.\u00a0During that same period, the Department of State\u2019s U.S. Agency for International Development awarded $55 million to the International Youth Foundation. Laureate CEO Douglas Becker is on the foundation\u2019s board of directors. International Youth Foundation, the Clinton Foundation and Laureate jointly participated in foundation programs.<\/p>\n A Laureate spokesman denied the quid pro quo charges: \u201cAllegations of any quid pro quo between Laureate, the International Youth Foundation and the Clintons are completely false,\u201d she told TheDCNF, adding, \u201cthe IFC\u2019s decision to invest in Laureate had no connection to and was not influenced in any way whatsoever by Hillary Clinton.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The IFC also awarded $150 million to another company owned by Frank Giustra, a close friend of Bill Clinton. Giustra donated $100 million to create the \u201cClinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership\u201d within the Clinton Foundation.\u00a0The funds went to Pacific Infrastructure, a company in which Giustra had a significant financial stake.\u00a0The company was to build a port and oil pipeline in Colombia that was strenuously opposed by environmental and human rights groups because the pipeline sliced through five indigenous villages and forcibly displaced the tribes.<\/p>\n Giustra also was an owner in Uranium One, a uranium mining company with operations in Kazakhstan and in the western United States.\u00a0Giustra wanted to sell a share of the uranium business to Russia\u2019s atomic energy agency, which required U.S. approval, including that of Secretary Clinton. The Russian investment was approved.<\/p>\n Blackburn added that it appeared the Clinton Foundation \u2014 which was tax-exempt only to construct and manage Clinton\u2019s presidential library \u2014 never got IRS approval to become a tax-exempt global organization with operations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Pacific and the Caribbean.<\/p>\n \u201cIn the Clinton Foundation we have a charity that has never filed the appropriate paperwork,\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/u> Blackburn charged.<\/p>\n Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst who has been investigating the Clinton Foundation, told TheDCNF that the expansion of the foundation into a global giant was not legally approved by the IRS.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s crystal clear in a review of their application that their purposes were narrowly limited, as they should have been, to a presidential archive in Little Rock, Arkansas,\u201d<\/strong><\/em> he said to TheDCNF. \u201cEnd of discussion.\u201d<\/p>\n Blackburn also questions the makeup of the Clinton Foundation\u2019s board of directors, which IRS rules require include independent, arm\u2019s-length board members.\u00a0The Clinton Foundation board mainly consists of close friends, business colleagues and big donors to the Clintons, as reported <\/a>by TheDCNF.<\/p>\n \u201cAll charities need to guard against incestuous relationships which limit their ability to be objective,\u201d <\/strong><\/em>the congresswoman said. \u201cIn the Clinton Foundation, we see a lack of diversity within their board.\u201d<\/p>\n Uranium One did not respond to TheDCNF\u2019s request for comment. The Clinton Foundation also did not respond to TheDCNF\u2019s request for comment.<\/p>\n