Two years earlier the Obama administration signed the United Nations Small Arms Treaty in an attempt to \u201cbackdoor\u201d the nullification of the Second Amendment.<\/span><\/p>\n The mainstream media ignored the unconstitutional aspect of these Obama actions choosing to ignore almost all of both stories while providing only a highly biased limited slice of coverage to the small arms treaty.\u00a0 <\/span>When others in the alternative media covered Obama\u2019s illegal overreach of American law they were labeled as conspiracy theorists and their reports were dismissed as untruthful or unnecessary scaremonering.<\/span><\/p>\n But nowhere does the Constitution give the president authority to quarter foreign troops on U.S. soil.\u00a0 <\/span>If anything, the presence of foreign military personnel within our borders qualifies as an act of war requiring the president to be responsible for their immediate removal.<\/span><\/p>\n Still, with the aid of a compliant Republican legislature, Obama went ahead with plans for a pact with the U.N. calling it the Strong Cities Network<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n Fast-forward nine months and this was the scene on US Interstate 81 in Virginia last Friday:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cCan\u2019t begin to tell you how many of these I passed today on 81 near Lexington, VA. Interesting times ahead!\u201d<\/i> \u2013 Jeff Stern Facebook poster<\/span><\/p>\n The materiel movement comes less than a year after the president\u2019s highly controversial Jade Helm exercises that saw him welcome massive amounts of U.N. materiel and personnel onto our shores:<\/span><\/p>\n There is no allowance in the enumerated powers of the U.S. Constitution that gives the president or any other branch of the federal government any authority to police American citizens.\u00a0 <\/span>This has been left to the states and to their municipalities.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n If anything, our Constitution\u2019s Framers believed that this relationship should work in the reverse and that it was incumbent on the citizens to police the government:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWhat country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n So what is the president up to?\u00a0 <\/span>Local police forces and each state\u2019s National Guard units have proven more than capable of quelling civil unrest within their communities when they\u2019ve called upon to do so and there is nothing to suggest that might no longer be the case.<\/span><\/p>\n For an answer to this question we can turn to this United Nations Careers job posting:<\/span><\/p>\n Two years ago the Activist Post<\/span><\/a> had come across this listing and followed with this analysis:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe U.N. is hiring a \u201cDisarmament, Demobilization, and Re-integration (DDR) officer\u201d for the apparent purpose of disarming American citizens as the \u201cduty station\u201d is New York City, USA.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe U.N. <\/i>defines<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a> \u201cdisarmament\u201d as\u00a0\u201cthe collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian population.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe <\/i>U.N.\u2019s help wanted ad<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a> reads:<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n These positions are located in field missions of Peace Operations. The DDR Officer typically reports to the head of a work unit or to a senior official responsible for DDR operations in a field location, though this may vary depending on the mission structure. The focus of these jobs is to lead the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of DDR programmes, operations and other related activities in the country or region concerned.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe definitions giving by the U.N. for the other activities <\/i>appear to be nefarious<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a> in their own right:<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n Demobilization<\/i><\/b> is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of \u201creinsertion\u201d which provides short-term assistance to ex-combatants.\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n Reintegration<\/i><\/b> is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe want ad makes no other reference to a\u00a0\u201ccountry or region concerned\u201d\u00a0other than the \u201cduty station\u201d in New York which is also the location of U.N.\u00a0headquarters.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n \u201cBut if this position is indeed for field work in the U.S., it raises a whole series of<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n sovereignty issues especially as it pertains to \u201cthe collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition\u201d from the civilian population.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n This job description sounds eerily similar to the work that U.S. troops were called upon to do in Kabul where they went door-to-door disarming Iraqis.<\/span><\/p>\n Today a number of independent reports claim that multiple C-130\u2019s and C-136\u2019s with U.N. markings have been landing at Barksdale AFB carrying U.N. troops.\u00a0 <\/span>Several U.S. military personnel are reporting that upon arrival, \u201c<\/i><\/span>the UN troops are given US military clothing and name tags.\u201d<\/i><\/span>\u00a0<\/i> To read more go to govtslaves.info<\/span><\/a>. <\/i>This is a measured and balanced must read that points out these troops \u201c<\/i><\/span>have no loyalty to our Constitution, they have no loyalty to the inherent rights that have always been ours as American citizens, and they have no basis for restraint in any action they might perceive as necessary, regardless of our laws.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n It is highly unusual for presidents to overstep their Constitutional powers.\u00a0 <\/span>It would be even more unusual for a president to do so with no purpose in mind.\u00a0 <\/span>Coupled with the refusal of Republicans to challenge the president on this, or any other of his globalist initiatives, we are left asking what do they have planned?<\/span><\/p>\n![\"UN-vehicle-1\"](\"http:\/\/patriotcrier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/UN-vehicle-1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"fhntc\"](\"http:\/\/patriotcrier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/fhntc.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
![\"UN-job-listing\"](\"http:\/\/patriotcrier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/UN-job-listing.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n