{"id":42663,"date":"2016-07-09T17:41:35","date_gmt":"2016-07-09T21:41:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=42663"},"modified":"2016-07-09T17:41:35","modified_gmt":"2016-07-09T21:41:35","slug":"hillarys-seven-biggest-lies-refuted-by-the-fbi-and-the-smoking-gun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=42663","title":{"rendered":"Hillary’s Seven Biggest Lies Refuted By The FBI, And The “Smoking Gun”"},"content":{"rendered":"

ZeroHedge.com<\/p>\n

When FBI director James Comey stunned America last week by exonerating Hillary Clinton for being “grossly negligent” in her abuse of professional duties, but not criminal<\/em>, he opened up a whole new can of worms for the presidential candidate, namely that she had repeatedly perjured herself and lied to both Congress and the American people.<\/p>\n

As a result, House Republicans said Thursday <\/a>they would seek a new FBI probe whether Clinton lied to Congress about her handling of classified information, as well as whether she perjured herself under oath during an 11-hour testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi, That referral could lead to a new investigation, once again putting Clinton under the glare of the Justice Department.<\/p>\n

It will hardly be difficult for an objective investigation to refute that Hillary lied: here is a brief summary of points which Hillary has made both on Capitol Hill and elsewhere, which the FBI report officially refuted:<\/p>\n

“I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

As the Hill reminds us<\/a>, this was one of first claims that Clinton made about her email setup, in a press conference at the United Nations shortly after it was revealed last year. We now know that more than 2,000 emails now contain information considered classified, but most of that was upgraded after it was sent.\u00a0 According to Comey, a total of 113 emails contained information that was classified at the time the messages were sent or received. Among those are eight threads containing 22 emails classified as top secret \u2014 the highest tier of classification.\u00a0 \u201cThere was classified material emailed,\u201d Comey told the House Oversight Committee on Thursday.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was allowed, but it was not a good choice\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Clinton has repeatedly described her email setup as permitted under the letter of the rules, though perhaps “unwise” as she put it in the middle of her Benghazi Committee testimony.\u00a0 Both the State Department\u2019s inspector general and the FBI disagree with that claim. The department\u2019s internal watchdog released a harshly critical report earlier this year saying that the setup \u201cwould not\u201d have been approved, had Clinton sought permission. Had employees within the FBI had a similar system, Comey testified this week, they might have been subject to a range of punishments up to and including being fired.\u00a0<\/em> \u201cYou could be walked out or, depending on the nature of the facts, you could be reprimanded,\u201d the FBI director testified in the House.However, the bureau would not have been able to prosecute them for federal crimes, he added. And there would be no punishments that could be handed down after the official had left office.<\/p>\n

\u201cI provided the department with all of my work-related emails, all that I had\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hillary also claimed repeatedly that all of her work-related messages were contained within the roughly 30,000 messages given to the State Department in 2014. Another batch of a similar size was purely personal, she has said, and those messages destroyed.\u00a0 This quote also came from the hearing in the Select Committee on Benghazi.\u00a0 The FBI managed to recover some of those deleted emails, through inboxes of her colleagues and from electronic breadcrumbs on decommissioned severs that Clinton used.\u00a0 According to Comey, \u201cthousands\u201d of those allegedly personal emails pertained to her work at the State Department.<\/em> At least of them contained classified information.<\/p>\n

\u201cI thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is another early claim of Clinton\u2019s, given during her March 2015, press conference explaining why she used a private server out of convenience. The rationale, she said at the time, was to use just her one BlackBerry device for all email traffic, instead of switching between multiple devices.\u00a0 But in fact, Clinton used \u201cmultiple devices\u201d throughout her four years as the nation\u2019s top diplomat, according to the head of the FBI chief. <\/em>\u201cThe FBI has the server that was used during the tenure of my State Department service\u201d\u00a0 The common understanding of Clinton\u2019s setup is that she used a single server throughout all four years, as this quote during the Benghazi Committee hearing seems to assert.\u00a0 But the FBI said that she used \u201cseveral\u201d different machines, which were taken offline as they became outdated and replaced.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe FBI has the server that was used during the tenure of my State Department service\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The common understanding of Clinton\u2019s setup is that she used a single server throughout all four years, as this quote during the Benghazi Committee hearing seems to assert.\u00a0 But the FBI said that she used \u201cseveral\u201d different machines, which were taken offline as they became outdated and replaced.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere were no security breaches\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s still unclear precisely what security mechanisms Clinton used to protect her servers from hackers, but her presidential campaign has repeatedly said that there is no evidence that the machine was hacked. The FBI was not able to uncover any evidence that hackers did break into her system, but that doesn\u2019t mean it didn\u2019t happen. Recall that almost two months ago, infamous Romanian hacker Guccifer – who penetrated Sidney Blumenthal’s email account- claimed he gained access to Hillary’s “completely unsecured” server<\/a>. “It was like an open orchid on the Internet,” Lazar told NBC News. “There were hundreds of folders.” It is strange that nobody has confirmed nor denied that claim to date. Additionally, hackers did break into the email accounts of people who had communicated with Clinton, Comey said, so they might have been able to map out her system as well.\u00a0 \u201cGiven that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton\u2019s personal email account,\u201d Comey warned.<\/p>\n

* * *<\/p>\n

But the biggest lie is one which Clinton not only repeated constantly before the FBI’s report, but more disturbingly, after.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In fact, just yesterday in an interview with MSNBC<\/a>, she once again said that \u201cThere was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Here are the facts that we know of: at least three emails among the more than 30,000 reviewed by the FBI have included some markings indicating information was classified.\u00a0 \u201cThere were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents,\u201d Comey testified this week.\u00a0 Those markings, however, were incomplete and according to the State Department made out of \u201chuman error.\u201d\u00a0 Classified documents are supposed to be marked as such at multiple points throughout the document, including at the top and next to each sensitive portion.\u00a0 The three emails in Clinton\u2019s inbox did not include the markings at the top of the page, just the ones next to particular sections. And the relevant portions did not actually contain classified information.<\/p>\n

According to Comey, Clinton might have not understood that the section markings \u2014 upper-case \u201cC\u201ds in parentheses \u2014 indicating that the information was supposed to be confidential, the lower tier of classification. In other words, Comey suggests Clinton was too stupid to understand what she was doing, and as a result was jeopardising American lives and tactics not due to intent but because she was merely incompetent: \u201cI don’t think that our investigation established she was actually particularly sophisticated with respect to classified information and the levels and treatment<\/strong>,\u201d the FBI director told the House Oversight Committee.<\/p>\n

Still, Comey told reporters this week that anyone in Clinton\u2019s position should have understood that dozens of the messages contained sensitive information. \u201cEven if information is not marked \u2018classified\u2019 in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it,\u201d he said.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

She repeated all of this during an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt yesterday, as per the following clip.<\/p>\n