- \n
- CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: \u201cAdd more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere\u201d<\/a><\/li>\n
- The Government Is Already \u201cGeo-Engineering\u201d The Environment<\/a><\/li>\n
- Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun<\/a><\/li>\n
- Colossal GeoEngineering in Plain Sight<\/a><\/li>\n
- Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up<\/a><\/li>\n
- Scientists to Create \u201cArtificial Volcano\u201d In Bid to Geoengineer Climate<\/a><\/li>\n
- Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China<\/a><\/li>\n
- Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up<\/a><\/li>\n
- U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere<\/a><\/li>\n
- Scientists Admit Chemtrails Are Creating Artificial Clouds<\/a><\/li>\n
- Geoengineering Unmonitored<\/a><\/li>\n
- Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
13. Why In The World Are They Spraying?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
14. Evidence of Weather Modification Technology In Use In Canterbury Shown on TVNZ One Weather 29 July,\u00a02013<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
15. Welsbach Patent for Atmospheric Seeding With Heavy\u00a0 Metals<\/a><\/p>\n
16. Neurologist Warms Aluminum in Chemtrails is a Dangerous Neurotoxin<\/a><\/p>\n
17. Frances Mangels Talks To John Whyte About Geoengineering:http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9jf_nVLGDTo<\/a><\/p>\n
18. http:\/\/www.truthnews.com.au\/archives\/category\/chemtrails<\/a><\/p>\n
19. Chemtrail PsyOps: NBC News Reports Jet \u201cContrails\u201d Change Our Weather For the \u201cBetter\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n
- The Government Is Already \u201cGeo-Engineering\u201d The Environment<\/a><\/li>\n
\n
![\"Malcolm081\"](\"http:\/\/chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/04\/malcolm081.jpg?w=640\")
<\/p>\n
Post-graduate researcher,\u00a0\u00a0 Mr Malcolm Scott<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On March the 11th, Mr Scott got a phone call\u00a0 from a member of the Climate Directorate staff informing him that a 6-page memo had been sent in error and they wanted it destroyed.\u00a0 Malcolm asked for the request in writing and lo and behold, later that afternoon this arrived via email:<\/p>\n Can you please confirm by return that you have destroyed the 6 page internal memorandum that was inadvertently released to you under the Official information (OIA).\u00a0 A mistake at our end and I apologise for that.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The request came as a surprise, as he had assumed the internal memo was part of the material sent in response to his questions, which included the letter posted below and dated February the 29th, 2016<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0 However, on examining the internal memo in more detail, he understood why the Ministry for the Environment did not want him to keep it.<\/p>\n Titled \u2018Malcolm Scott 16-D-00142\u2032\u00a0 <\/em>and dated February the 24th, 2016, the internal memo is written in relation to questions Mr Scott had submitted to the Ministry under the Official Information Act, (OIA) on February the 8th, 2016, regarding atmospheric aerosol operations.<\/p>\n While he is unable to allow it to be published yet, it has been cited for this article.<\/p>\n Under the heading \u2018Risks\u2019<\/strong><\/em> the memo mentions that their response to Mr Scott is considered to be \u201clow risk\u201d\u00a0<\/em> as: \u201cThere is not much material in scope and what is released is only a list of dates.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n It also refers to the perceived risk in relation to the media, indicating that keeping atmospheric aerosol operations out of the public\u2019s consciousness is important to the government.\u00a0 It states: \u201cCorrespondents often make multiple requests, but all enquiries have proved to be low risk, attracting little if any public or media attention.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0 Needless to state the internal memo provides important insights into the Ministry for the Environment\u2019s policies related to OIA requests regarding aerosols operations.\u00a0 It strongly suggests that there is a directive to deny that atmospheric aerosol operations are taking place, thereby indicating that those in power do not respect the public\u2019s right to know the facts when the Official Information Act is applied.<\/p>\n When Mr Scott received the request to destroy the internal memo, we consulted with a number of people to find out what his options were, as he believes the public has a right to see it.\u00a0\u00a0 Investigative journalist and government watchdog, Nicky Hagar, who wrote Secret Power<\/em> and Dirty Politics<\/em> advised:\u00a0 \u201cMalcolm has no obligation at all to destroy that memo. They slipped up and sent an internal document. They addressed it to him and sent it. It\u2019s their problem. He would probably be entitled to be sent the same document if he applied for it under the Privacy Act anyway\u2026\u201d <\/em> In a letter dated April the 5th, Mr Scott requested the memo under the Privacy Act<\/a>\u00a0 on the basis that it is related to his research inquiries and bears significant reference to information about himself.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cI also advised Ministry officials and staff that they have a responsibility to act in the public good, to uphold existing environmental legislation and work with other governmental authorities to ensure legislation which protects the environment is enforced,\u201d <\/em>he offered.\u00a0 He is waiting for their reply.<\/p>\n Mr Scott, who is very concerned about this issue, said he believes the time is overdue for the Ministry for the Environment to step up to their responsibilities in relation to the aerosol spraying operations underway in New Zealand and demonstrate the environmental stewardship and leadership the public expects.<\/p>\n Democracy is being undermined as access to information is being denied.\u00a0 Reform of the Ministry\u2019s policies is imperative in order to protect the environment and the health of humans and other species.\u00a0 This is far more important than maintaining secrecy.\u00a0\u00a0 The facts regarding atmospheric aerosol operations must be released.<\/p>\n Below:<\/strong> A slideshow showing some evidence of atmospheric aerosol operations both here in New Zealand and overseas.<\/p>\n Below:<\/strong> Letter from the Ministry for the Environment, answering Malcolm Scott\u2019s questions in a typically guarded manner.\u00a0
\n
\n
\n<\/em><\/p>\n![\"Springer1\"](\"http:\/\/chemtrailsnorthnz.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/04\/malcolmoia-reply12.jpg\")
<\/a>Mr Scott offers: \u201cThere are repeated references to risk assessment of release of information, and it is apparent that staff are actively monitoring public and media attention to reports of aerosol forcing operations.\u00a0 This seems unusual given that Ministry officials have repeatedly denied any awareness of aerosol forcing operations and repeatedly claimed that there\u2019s no evidence of these operations in New Zealand.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPhoto of Aerosol Trails Criss-crossing the sky from Geoengineeringwatch.org.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n