Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
I review a mind-control review of Vaxxed<\/p>\n
Vaxxed opened this weekend at the Angelika Film Center in New York, after being censored at the Tribeca Film Festival.<\/p>\n
\u2014My analysis of how a conformist film critic operates, starting with the basics, which of course involve mind control.<\/p>\n
Where did the word \u201cofficial\u201d come from?<\/p>\n
by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
April 3, 2016<\/p>\n
(To read about Jon\u2019s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix<\/strong>, click here<\/a>.)<\/em><\/p>\n Mainstream media is all about what the audience wants to hold on to.<\/p>\n The audience wants stability.<\/p>\n When you boil it down, this means they want something official.<\/p>\n Stable=official.<\/p>\n The actual substance of the news dries up like rain on the street after the sun comes out again. Gone. Doesn\u2019t matter. As long as the audience feels they\u2019ve received the Official Word.<\/p>\n Official=a slave signaling admiration for his master. It\u2019s the Stockholm syndrome writ large.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s go to the scorecard: the two Latin roots of the word \u201cofficial.\u201d Opus (work), and facere (to do or make). \u201cTo do work.\u201d Seems rather harmless.<\/p>\n But somewhere along the line it was inflated\u2014for instance, \u201cholding office\u201d; \u201che held an office in the government.\u201d<\/p>\n And, as often happens, when the Latin moves forward into the medieval period, when the Church takes hold, the concept is made gaseous. In this case, \u201cto do work\u201d becomes \u201cdivine service.\u201d<\/p>\n Yes. As in the divine right of kings to rule, to make laws, to call the shots, to issue orders.<\/p>\n Official looms large.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s say I run a major media outlet. It would be in my interest to make distinctions between \u201cofficial\u201d and \u201cmeritless.\u201d Who wants meritless or conspiratorial or dissenting or odd or weird or in-the-minority? Those categories are worthless, and pointing this out bolsters my superior status and position. I am reliable. They are not. That\u2019s how I play the game.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve talked to many mainstream reporters over the years. They know almost nothing important about what they\u2019re reporting on. Some of them have high IQs, but they\u2019re dumb as wood when it comes to the content and nature of the issues they convey to the public. And this is on purpose. There is no reason to have acute and deep knowledge. It doesn\u2019t fit the format. Their work involves looking and sounding convincing, which is a different kind of job.<\/p>\n It\u2019s actually a hindrance to know too much. It gets in the way.<\/p>\n Their job is to come across as official<\/em>.<\/p>\n For instance, in a review of the just-released film, Vaxxed<\/em> (trailer<\/a>)\u2014and I\u2019m not going to dignify the reporter by mentioning him or his outlet\u2014the Gibbering Fantasist (reviewer) states that the director of the film, Andrew Wakefield, is a doctor who had his license stripped in England. In other words, Wakefield is \u201cunofficial.\u201d It doesn\u2019t matter why his license was taken away, or whether some grave injustice was committed in that regard. Don\u2019t bother looking into that mess. It\u2019s enough to say \u201cthe source of the film\u201d wasn\u2019t official.<\/p>\n The Fantasist (reviewer) also mentions that the subject of the film, William Thompson, a CDC whistleblower who confesses to extreme scientific fraud, who gave the MMR vaccine a free pass and concealed its connection to autism, is not seen walking and talking and sitting in the film. The audience only hears his voice. Thompson is therefore \u201cunofficial.\u201d No mention is made of the fact that Thompson, since his 2014 confession in writing, refuses to be interviewed by the press<\/a>. That\u2019s irrelevant. (And do I need to point out that radio news is audio only\u2014with no faces?)<\/p>\n The reviewer further states that the audio clips of whistleblower Thompson in the film were recorded during telephone calls\u2014without Thompson\u2019s permission. By implication, this is supposed to mean that Thompson\u2019s revealing audio confessions are also unofficial. Of course, many news stories have come from recorded phone calls\u2014but in this case, they\u2019re suddenly not \u201cadmissible.\u201d<\/p>\n The reviewer mentions that the producer of Vaxxed<\/em>, Del Bigtree, speaks in the film. Since that is purportedly unusual, it\u2019s \u201cunofficial.\u201d It can be discounted and ignored.<\/p>\n What\u2019s left? Not much. The film is not credible because it\u2019s not official. Why didn\u2019t the reviewer just come out and say that? He could have written a one-sentence article.<\/p>\n He could have called the CDC, which is exposed in the film, and asked for a statement. An official one, of course.<\/p>\n He could simply have exclaimed the Official Word on vaccines: \u201cThey\u2019re all safe and effective! That\u2019s all you need to know!\u201d And then headed out for a drink.<\/p>\n Or he could have written this: \u201cI\u2019m giving you the official word on an unofficial film. The film has no status in the mainstream. Don\u2019t bother seeing it. It\u2019ll fill your head with unofficial thoughts, and you won\u2019t know what to do with them. That\u2019s what unofficial material does. It leaves you in the lurch. My job is to remind you where your mind should live, which is where everyone else\u2019s lives. That\u2019s where you want to be. If you think you can be anywhere else, you\u2019re on the verge of going delusional, and that\u2019s dangerously dangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n Indeed.<\/p>\n The Fantasist Reviewer manages to avoid mentioning that the whistleblower, William Thompson, a long-time CDC researcher, did an astonishing thing by coming out of the heavily guarded scientific closet and confessing to fraud on a scale that is staggering:<\/p>\n He and his colleagues permitted a highly dangerous and destructive vaccine to remain in use.<\/p>\n But why should the Fantasist mention it? Thompson committed an unofficial act.<\/p>\n He committed it in arena where only the good and true and humane and dedicated and brilliant and competent and caring and dutiful and self-sacrificing and life-affirming medical authorities are supposed to rule.<\/p>\n Thompson stuck a knife in the heart of all that.<\/p>\n And Officialdom must not acknowledge it, on pain of death.<\/p>\n Therefore, it doesn\u2019t acknowledge it.<\/p>\n No. Instead, news operates this way, to paraphrase Orwell:<\/p>\n \u201cTonight, on a street corner, a citizen accosted a news reporter. The following exchange took place. Roll the video.\u201d<\/p>\n Citizen: \u201c2 and 2 equal 4.\u201d<\/p>\n Reporter: \u201cNo. They equal 5.\u201d<\/p>\n Citizen: \u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n Reporter: \u201cIt\u2019s official.\u201d<\/p>\n Citizen: \u201cOh. I see.\u201d<\/p>\n Reporter: \u201cNo you don\u2019t. But it doesn\u2019t matter.\u201d<\/p>\n