{"id":32330,"date":"2016-02-26T07:09:07","date_gmt":"2016-02-26T11:09:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=32330"},"modified":"2016-02-26T07:09:07","modified_gmt":"2016-02-26T11:09:07","slug":"official-911-story-destroyed-irrefutable-un-doctored-photographic-and-scientific-evidence-whistleblower-videos-expert-testimony-and-undeniable-truths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=32330","title":{"rendered":"\u201cOfficial\u201d 9\/11 story destroyed! Irrefutable un-doctored photographic and scientific evidence, whistleblower videos, expert testimony and undeniable truths!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more-->By <span id=\"pen_name\" class=\"authors_name\">Look up&#8230;Wake up<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Hello friends,<\/p>\n<p>In this post I am going to PROVE beyond the shadow of a doubt that the \u201cOfficial\u201d explanation of what happened on September 11 2001 (9\/11) is a total fabrication from beginning to end.<strong>THERE WERE NO PLANES<\/strong>!<\/p>\n<p>Before you start hemming and hawing, review the evidence and make up your own mind\u2026and please pass it around.<\/p>\n<p>All the information and evidence is readily available on internet, as you will see.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>As the \u201cofficial\u201d story goes\u2026<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>4 jets were hijacked by a bunch of Arab terrorists<\/strong>, who, until that day, only had limited experience on small single engine planes such as Cessnas, Pipers etc\u2026 It\u2019s like going from carving a turkey to performing open-heart surgery, but on this day, september 11<sup>th<\/sup> 2001, the four \u201cterrorist\u201d pilots managed to fly Boeing passenger planes, at low altitudes, and hit three of their four intended targets with precision, the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. As for the forth and last plane which was headed to crash into the White House\u2026it was supposedly overtaken by \u201cheroic\u201d passengers and wound up crashing in a field in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Did I forget anything?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Oh yeah, this band of Arab terrorists somehow <strong><em>fooled ALL of the United States defense systems<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cActually, you do not need any of the expert evidence to know that the US government\u2019s story is false. As I have previously pointed out, had a few young Saudi Arabians, the alleged 9\/11 hijackers, been capable of outwitting, without support from any government and intelligence service, not only the <strong>CIA and FBI, but all sixteen US intelligence services, the intelligence services of Washington\u2019s NATO allies and Israel\u2019s Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic Control, and defeat Airport Security four times in one hour on the same morning<\/strong>, the White House, Congress, and the media would have been demanding an investigation of how the National Security State could so totally fail.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"FIOnDemandWrapper\">\n<div class=\"apd_static_banner \"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-3622156405313063\" data-ad-slot=\"r7zwSvA9pqDBPYqKPPXj\" data-adsbygoogle-status=\"done\"><ins id=\"aswift_2_expand\"><ins id=\"aswift_2_anchor\"><iframe id=\"aswift_2\" name=\"aswift_2\" width=\"336\" height=\"280\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/ins><\/ins><\/ins><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><em>The author of this quote, <strong>Dr Paul Craig Roberts<\/strong>,<\/em> was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy Under president Reagan and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2013\/09\/10\/too-many-years-of-lies-from-mossadeq-to-911\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2013\/09\/10\/too-many-years-of-lies-from-mossadeq-to-911\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>THE FACT IS\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>We were repeatedly shown the same<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>DOCTORED videos and images of animated jets<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>slamming into the Towers over and over and over<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>till we bought into the \u201cofficial\u201d story<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>without question.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Without further ado, I am now going to prove to you, using sworn expert testimony and un-doctored photographic and video evidence, that not only did NO PLANES hit the Pentagon or the field in Pennsylvania, but in fact, NO PLANES hit the Twin Towers either! You\u2019ve been duped. We all have been. It was a Hollywood production from beginning to end.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s what really happened that day\u2026or what really <strong>didn\u2019t happen<\/strong> that day\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This post is broken down as follows:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Exhibit A:<\/strong> No planes hit the Twin Towers<\/p>\n<p><strong>Exhibit B:<\/strong> No plane hit the Pentagon<\/p>\n<p><strong>Exhibit C:<\/strong> No plane crashed in Pennsylvania (Flight 93)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Exhibit D:<\/strong> Building 7\u2026no plane either<\/p>\n<p><strong>Re-cap<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong> Beware of \u201cControlled Opposition\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; EXHIBIT A: No planes hit the TWIN TOWERS\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Let\u2019s start<\/em><\/strong> by looking what happens to an aluminum airliner when it hits <strong>WATER<\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/sKC9C0HCNH8?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It desintegrates!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Since when can Aluminum cut through reinforced concrete and steel?!?<\/em><\/strong><em><strong>\u2026.since NEVER\u2026it can\u2019t!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>The modern day civilian transportation airliner is made out of aluminum, similar to an aluminum can. If shot into a concrete and steel wall, an aluminum can would be crushed on impact and fall to the ground. Fact is there is NO WAY an aluminum jet could cut through a reinforced concrete and steel structure. Even the engines would have probably fallen to the ground outside following impact.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Plane%20slice%20911.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This image represents the impact site of Tower 2. Notice the little person in the red rectangle. Her name was Edna Cintron. She is standing about where the left wing attached to the fuselage of the \u201cplane\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Left%20wing%20cut%20through%20here.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is a close up of where the left wing supposedly went through.<\/p>\n<p>Notice Edna on the right.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Proof%20no%20plane%20cut%20through(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Do you really believe the left wing fit through this tight space?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This is the same view as above, enlarged\u2026notice Edna (light green oval) is not alone (red oval to left). Notice the two yellow arrows. They point to two massive steel reinforced walls that the aluminum wing supposedly sliced through! The light green arrow is pointing to the steel reinforced concrete floor the wing supposedly also went through!<\/p>\n<p>The blue rectangle at the top shows that the inner steel layer stayed in place when it should have imploded inward upon impact. Instead we see that the explosion was rather towards the outside, ripping away the external steel stucture outwards.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; The plane\u2019s aluminum nose goes through the building???<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0 I don\u2019t think so\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/nose%20before.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><strong>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/nose%20after.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/nose%20after%20closeup.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The following <strong>video is by a visual arts professional<\/strong> and exposes how they achieved this fakery\u2026 and what they did wrong:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/fDXN4iGbJiw?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; John Lear<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>sworn testimony<\/strong> you are about to discover was given by <strong>John Lear<\/strong>, the son of\u00a0<strong>Learjet inventor<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Bill Lear<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Lear%20jet.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0Learjet<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>John Lear is 65 years of age, a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with over 19,000 hours of flight time, over 11,000 of which are in command of 3 or 4 engine jet transports, has flown over 100 different types of aircraft in 60 different countries around the world. He retired in 2001 after 40 years \/15\u2019000hrs of flying.<\/p>\n<p>He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certificated airman. These include the Airline Transport Pilot certificate with 23 type ratings, Flight Instructor, Flight Engineer, Flight Navigator, Ground Instructor, Aircraft Dispatcher, Control Tower Operator and Parachute Rigger.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As a witness in a lawsuit, Mr Lear has given his sworn expert testimony that it would have been <strong>physically impossible<\/strong> for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9\/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cNo Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors\u2019, he stated in the affidavit.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 \u2018These crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun \u2018telescoping\u2019 when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7 <strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong> \u2018The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/the-tap.blogspot.fr\/2014\/03\/ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/the-tap.blogspot.fr\/2014\/03\/ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/3N2RrQWsGes?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Listen to John Lear in his own words declare that<strong><em>: \u201cThere were no planes at 9\/11, there were no planes at the Pentagon, there were no planes that hit the twin Towers\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/strong> within the first 10 seconds of this video, before he then goes on to explain why.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Extreme heat was responsible for weakening the structural integrity of the Towers\u2026Oh Really?!?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We were told that the extreme heat from the jet fuel fire melted the steel columns causing them to bow and weaken, such that the structure could no longer support it\u2019s own weight and came crashing down.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Extreme%20heat_.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Observe the above photos.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The slash across the Tower in the top image is supposedly the entry site of the \u201cterrorist\u2019s\u201d plane.<\/p>\n<p>Oh\u2026but wait\u2026aren\u2019t there 2 women visible right where the heat should be at it\u2019s hottest?<\/p>\n<p>One is standing, her name was Edna Cintron and the other laying down\u2026their long flowing hair not even singed, not the slightest evidence of excessive heat anywhere to be seen. One is touching the side of the building with bare hands; the other laying on her stomach on what should be a very hot surface.<\/p>\n<p>And we were told that the towers fell within an hour of these photos due to \u201cthe intense heat\u201d from the jet fuel fire. <strong>As you can see there was no intense heat, no fire! It\u2019s all bull!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These two women were murdered, as were over 3000 others, several minutes after this photo was taken, when the buildings were professionally taken down by<strong>CONTROLLED DEMOLITION<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Proof that jet fuel fires don\u2019t burn hot enough to melt steel:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As you can see below, <strong>jet fuel burns at 1,890\u00b0F<\/strong> (1,030\u00b0C) in an open-air combustion.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Capture%20d%E2%80%99e%CC%81cran%202015-01-11%20a%CC%80%2014_52_47.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jet_fuel\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jet_fuel<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And in this chart below, observe that <strong>steel\u2019s melting point is 600\u00b0F hotter<\/strong>\u2026 at<strong>2500\u00b0F<\/strong>! Therefore in is not possible that the heat generated by burning jet fuel could ever get hot enough to melt the steel supports\u2026and especially not after only one hour!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Capture%20d%E2%80%99e%CC%81cran%202015-01-11%20a%CC%80%2014_56_43.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>More proof: A Chechnyan 40 story skyscraper burns like a torch for hours and never collapses!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/EBkIprte4SE?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8211; Proof that the \u201cOfficial\u201d 9\/11 videos were DOCTORED\u2026NO PLANES HIT THE TOWERS.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This next Video is a live news-feed from a News helicopter which was filming the scene when the 2<sup>nd<\/sup> explosion went off at Tower 2\u2026<strong>with no plane anywhere to be seen<\/strong>!<\/p>\n<p>This video is in German\u2026either watch the whole thing or start at the <strong>5 min mark<\/strong> to see the original video played simultaneously with the doctored one.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>If this does not WAKE YOU UP\u2026nothing will.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/NWeLN8UEnT8?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NWeLN8UEnT8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Capture%20d%E2%80%99e%CC%81cran%202015-01-11%20a%CC%80%2015_01_27.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>original live footage<\/strong> on the left clearly has the blue Hudson river as a backdrop with boats floating on its surface and the New Jersey shore line in the distance. In this video an explosion is seen, but no plane. This video is <strong>THE<\/strong> video used to create the doctored version, as you will see!<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>doctored video<\/strong> to the right, however, has the background totally white-ed out to better contrast the fake plane overlay. When played side by side, the truth speaks for itself.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, that is an NBC logo in the bottom right hand corner of the deceptive, doctored video. NBC is obviously in on the conspiracy\u2026as are ALL the media houses the world over who have so successfully kept the lie going for 13 years.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>BY THE WAY\u2026\u201dconspiracy theory\u201d does not mean \u201cmade up story\u201d as some people out there seem to think\u2026a conspiracy merely describes an act as being planned and executed by more than one person\u2026ex: several people \u201cconspired\u201d to rob a bank.<\/p>\n<p><u><strong>Conspiracy<\/strong><\/u>:\u00a0 \u201can evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by <strong>two or more<\/strong> persons; plot.\u201c (Dictionary.com)<\/p>\n<p>One person alone would have had a hard time pulling off 9\/11, so I think one could safely call it a conspiracy, in fact\u2026 a massive conspiracy.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Must see:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong> <strong>How they made the \u201cDoctored\u201d, deceptive video:<\/strong><\/p>\n<h1>Digital Computer Recreation of 9\/11 WTC \u2018Airliner\u2019 Impact<\/h1>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/IWZyXRuz1Uk?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>So, if there were no planes\u2026what brought the Towers down?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Evidence of explosives found in 911 dust samples:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Nano-thermite found in 9\/11 dust:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/4RNyaoYR3y0?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Dr Neils Harrit, a chemistry professor from the University of Copenhagan found military grade nano-thermite explosive material present in the dust samples taken from ground zero. The nano-thermite he found was in both the reacted and un-reacted forms. By Mr Harrit\u2019s calculations, tons of it would have had to have been placed strategically in advance in order remove the steel supports and have the building fall in it\u2019s own footprint at free-fall speeds. The nano-thermitic ignition reaction can INSTANTLY produce heats in excess of 4000\u00b0F! More than hot enough to instantly melt steel, wouldn\u2019t you agree?<\/p>\n<p>In fact they used more nano-thermite than needed to bring the buildings down and it continued reacting for a whole six weeks later. Nobody could approach ground zero because of the molten metal and the heat it produced.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news-section\/41-articles\/646-faq-8-what-is-nanothermite-could-it-have-been-used-to-demolish-the-wtc-skyscrapers.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news-section\/41-articles\/646-faq-8-what-is-nanothermite-could-it-have-been-used-to-demolish-the-wtc-skyscrapers.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Others believe small nuclear devices were used:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cDr. Ed Ward has documented\u00a0what he believes\u00a0is the\u00a0use of micro-nukes\u00a0on the World Trade Center complex attack that took place in September of 2001.<\/p>\n<p>One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust, but that\u2019s not all.<\/p>\n<p>Massive steel beams were bent like pretzels as the towers collapsed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/www.rense.com\/general92\/pr911.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.rense.com\/general92\/pr911.htm<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>A jet fuel fire could not result in six weeks worth of molten metal at ground zero<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are several published observations of molten metal in the basements of all three buildings, WTC 1, 2 (\u201cTwin Towers\u201d) and 7. For example, Dr. Keith Eaton toured Ground Zero and stated in <em>The Structural Engineer<\/em>, \u2018They showed us many fascinating slides\u2019 [Eaton] continued, \u2018ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster\u2019. (<em>Structural Engineer<\/em>, September 3, 2002, p. 6.)\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/jonrappoport.wordpress.com\/2014\/02\/08\/911-official-scenario-what-about-the-pools-of-melted-metal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/jonrappoport.wordpress.com\/2014\/02\/08\/911-official-scenario-what-about-the-pools-of-melted-metal\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>MUST SEE VIDEO<\/strong>: Incontrovertible Proof that we are being lied to about the presence of molten steel at ground zero.<\/p>\n<p>First you will hear a government official deny that there are any witnesses to the \u201cmolten metal\u201d claim, and then hear the actual testimony of witness after witness after witness stating that not only was there molten steel, but it was like a foundry with rivers of molten metal, like lava!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/8YaFGSPErKU?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; EXHIBIT B: NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Pentagon%20front%20view(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Front view of Pentagon. The supposed plane came from behind (red arrow).<\/p>\n<p>Notice the highway that runs right next to the \u201ccrash site\u201d (blue arrow).<\/p>\n<p>On 9\/11, the highway was full of cars, yet no one witnessed seeing a plane!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/pentagon%20before%20ceiling%20collapse(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The above image was taken just minutes after the \u201ccrash\u201d. The red arrow shows the roof is still intact and has not yet collapsed, the yellow arrow shows the impact site.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Pentagon%20after%20collapse.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Shot taken after the roof collapsed. Look at all the traffic on the Highway! Yet nobody saw a plane.<\/p>\n<p>Do you see any evidence of a plane crash?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Exit%20hole%2C%20no%20plane.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Observe the exit hole on the inside of the Pentagon. Do you think a plane created this hole? Looks more like an unexploded missle exit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Look at all the light poles and metallic structures in the flight path that are still standing. Do you think a Boeing jet could fit through there without knocking them over?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/plane%20size%20pentagon.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This shows you the relative size of the plane they claim hit the Pentagon.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Pentagon%20no%20fire(2).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>They told us that there were no remains of the plane because it vaporized into thin air on impact?!? due to the intense heat perhaps from the jet fuel?!? But within the red circle in the image above there are no signs of fire, no burnt, blackened walls. In fact you can clearly make out office furniture and computer monitors\u2026and in the blue box, notice all the windows are still intact!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Pentagon Video:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Pentagon must have hundreds of security cameras around the perimeter, wouldn\u2019t you agree? Below is the <strong>ONLY video they would release<\/strong>\u2026what a joke!<\/p>\n<p>The impact is at the 25 second mark. Don\u2019t blink, you might miss it!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/AzFqXbfv_yg?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Did you see a plane? A far cry from the Tower videos!<\/p>\n<p>Why not give us a few more camera angles?<\/p>\n<p>Because <strong>NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON<\/strong>!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<em>&#8211; Exhibit C: No Plane crashed in Pennsylvania!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Flight%2093(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This movie made about Flight 93 is pure fantasy\u2026complete and total propaganda!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The official story is that the box-cutter toting Arab \u201cterrorists\u201d were gang rushed by a few courageous passengers, who luckily were able to document the whole event over their cellular phones to their friends and family, (some were on the phone as long as 20 min) at cruising altitudes of 30\u2019000 ft.<\/p>\n<p>If you stop and think about it, you know full well that you cannot get a cellular signal once off the ground and certainly not at 30\u2019000 ft. Especially not 13 years ago! Even now you would need a satellite connection.<\/p>\n<p>How could anybody have believed such obvious BS? But we did\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>These next photos show two actual plane crashes\u2026notice the plane parts, scattered belongings, body parts, luggage etc\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/real%20plane%20accidents.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Now look at the crash site of Flight 93\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/Crash%20site%20flight%2093.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t believe me? do a \u201cGoogle Image\u201d search of the Flight 93 crash site for yourself!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h1>The following video is a must see, amazing footage and honest reporting from the Flight 93 crash site:<\/h1>\n<p>Listen to <em><strong>what the local news had to say<\/strong><\/em> about what they found at the site.<\/p>\n<h1>&#8211; Eyewitness \u2013 Crater Too Small For A 767, No Bodies, No Wreckage<\/h1>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/mLcb8OJOH00?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h1><\/h1>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There\u2026I have proven to you beyond a shadow of a doubt that<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOT EVEN ONE PLANE WAS USED ON 9\/11<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not on the Twin Towers<\/p>\n<p>Not at the Pentagon<\/p>\n<p>Not in Pennsylvania<\/p>\n<p>we have all been deceived\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>But now the clincher\u2026<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Exhibit D:<\/em><\/strong> There was a 3<sup>rd<\/sup> building at the World Trade Center to collapse on 9\/11 <strong><em>\u2026 Building 7<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Did you know that about 7 hours after the Twin towers collapsed, at 5:27pm, a third building, the Salomon Brother\u2019s building, Building N\u00b07, collapsed as well? That\u2019s right\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Mamvq7LWqRU?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>First they said that Building 7 collapsed because of collateral damage and office fires\u2026then they changed the official story and admitted that they demolished Building 7 \u201cbecause it represented a danger to the public\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Only problem is that it takes WEEKS to set-up a controlled demolition, especially one in the middle of one of the most populated cities in the world\u2026more lies.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; BBC and CNN both announced the collapse of Building 7 prematurely<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>\u2026 the BBC did so <strong>27 minutes before it actually happened<\/strong>\u2026on tape!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/BBC%20report%20building%207(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>See the video for yourself\u2026<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ltP2t9nq9fI?feature=player_detailpage&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; The BBC got sued and LOST for lying about 9\/11 tens years later:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a result of this screw-up by the BBC, Documentary filmmaker saw an opportunity to expose the 9\/11 lie\u2026<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/contributor\/upload\/367504\/images\/911\/BBC%20sued(1).jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/en\/news-section\/41-articles\/754-bbc-court-case-result-ignites-new-push-for-911-justice.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/en\/news-section\/41-articles\/754-bbc-court-case-result-ignites-new-push-for-911-justice.html<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This past september, he won his case:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/alternative\/2014\/09\/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up-video-3029674.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\/alternative\/2014\/09\/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up-video-3029674.html<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8211; Controlled demolition of Building7\u00a0 FINALLY Confirmed:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Press release:\u00a0<\/em> World Trade Center Building 7\u2019s Controlled Demolition: 9\/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>June 1, 2014 \u2013The 24-member 9\/11 Consensus Panel \u2013, which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers \u2013 today announced <strong>three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/r2\/?url=http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2014\/06\/03\/wtc-7-now-proven-case-controlled-demolition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2014\/06\/03\/wtc-7-now-proven-case-controlled-demolition\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>So let\u2019s recap:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 It\u2019s impossible for an aluminum plane to pass straight through a reinforced concrete and steel building, at any speed!<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 Extreme heat did not bring down the Towers: Jet fuel \u201copen air\u201d combustion burns at 1890\u00b0F, but steel\u2019s melting point is 2500\u00b0F\u2026that\u2019s a difference of 600\u00b0F<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 Evidence that the \u201cOfficial\u201d videos depicting Tower 1 and Tower 2 attacks were doctored<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 Military grade nano-thermite incendiary explosive was found, in reacted and un-reacted forms, in the Ground Zero dust by Dr Neils Harrit.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0A small nuclear device might also have used, as suggested by Dr Ed Ward to explain the reduction of 5.3 billion pounds of steel into 2 billion pounds of dust within seconds.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 Molten metal was witnessed for up to six weeks after 9\/11. As already proven, extreme heat was not the cause of structural weakness or collapse. So what is keeping the steel molten for six weeks running?<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 There is absolutely no evidence that would give validity to the claim that a plane hit the Pentagon. More likely a self-inflicted missile strike.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 There is no evidence of a plane crashing in the field in Pennsylvania. No plane parts, no luggage, no body parts\u2026nothing.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7 The BBC and CNN had advanced prior knowledge of the World Trade Center\u2019s Building 7\u2032s imminent collapse and reported it <strong>27 minutes prematurely<\/strong> blaming collateral structural damage from the Twin Towers as the cause. They later recanted saying that Building 7 was brought down by \u201ccontrolled demolition\u201d in order to secure the safety of the citizens. lol<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7\u00a0 A new report confirms that Building 7 was brought down 5 hours after the Twin Towers by \u201c<strong>controlled demolition<\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>CONCLUSION:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Why is what happened on 9\/11 so important?<\/p>\n<p>Because ever since this elaborate and apparently convincing hoax was perpetrated, the whole world has been conned into supporting the rape and pillage of countless countries in it\u2019s name and have looked the other way as over a million people have been slaughtered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and others, all victims of this contrived war on terror\u2026all due to the lie that is 9\/11!<\/p>\n<p>We have been told that terrorists are everywhere! They tell us that we need to spy on our neighbors and give up our freedoms in order to be safe. We are told that the governments of the world have no choice but to listen to all our conversations, and read all our emails and that we need to trust them to keep us safe.<\/p>\n<p>Who is going to keep us safe from the <em><strong>real<\/strong><\/em> terrorists\u2026the ones who <em><strong>really<\/strong><\/em> want total dominance over us and <em><strong>really<\/strong><\/em> mean us harm?<\/p>\n<p>The muslims aren\u2019t the ones spraying chemtrails daily over our communities or putting GMO in our food. They are not the ones putting poison in the vaccines (SV40, mercury, aluminum etc.) or the ones fear mongering and hell bent on starting WWIII. They are not the ones humiliating us at the airport with pat downs and cavity searches and they are not the ones trampling on our hard earned rights and freedoms. They are not the ones responsable for the derivatives bubble, precious metals manipulation nor the pending economic collapse and they certainly are not the ones responsible for 9\/11!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s time to wake up\u2026<\/p>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/9-11-and-ground-zero\/2015\/01\/official-911-story-destroyed-irrefutable-un-doctored-photographic-and-scientific-evidence-whistleblower-videos-expert-testimony-and-undeniable-truths-2441164.html\">http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/9-11-and-ground-zero\/2015\/01\/official-911-story-destroyed-irrefutable-un-doctored-photographic-and-scientific-evidence-whistleblower-videos-expert-testimony-and-undeniable-truths-2441164.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32330"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32330\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}