Rohnert Park, CA
\nFebruary 25, 2016<\/p>\n
by Rich Scheck<\/p>\n
The following article represents the paucity of thinking The author presents a false choice and goes on to justify This “lesser of two evils” mentality is the reason we find Both parties are profoundly corrupt and no leader can The solution to the above dilemma is to eschew voting\u00a0for either Hillary or Trump, i. e. avoid voting Republican\u00a0or Democratic. Period! End of sentence! Done!<\/p>\n How about folks selecting the person and the party they\u00a0truly want? I know: what a concept!?!<\/p>\n Most countries have many, many parties to pick from and\u00a0survive despite—or because–of such an approach.<\/p>\n What is particularly discouraging about the author’s position is that it comes from an erstwhile conservative, someone who is supposed to believe in competition and business innovation.<\/p>\n Did it not somehow enter the guy’s brain to start his own Whatever the answer to that question, the answer to the Say NO to the current system! Write-in the name of your But if none of that resonates with you, then just go out So what if that leaves the White House in the hands of The best example of that this year is Bernie Sanders. So very decent, caring folks knocked themselves out for To that I say: Bullshit! You fooled yourself. You were Now these folks will be stuck with the corrupt, baggage- Even if you are down with that, she presents such a How sad. I invite everyone to read your history books Wow: who knew? Well, a few of us did. And a few of In a bizarre fashion, this was the year that happened. So we have two third parties kinda running against each Again, very sad and a waste of energy. How much more That is what Webster Tarpley has done with his Tax Wall So I will end this little lecture by repeating myself: please http:\/\/revolutionradio.org\/?p=122523<\/a><\/p>\n
\namong most contemporary political pundits:
\nhttp:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2016\/02\/24\/ill-take-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhis limited perspective by saying he would choose to vote
\nfor Hillary Clinton because Trump is worse.<\/p>\n
\nourselves in our current mess.<\/p>\n
\nsave them at this time. And the fact that they keep
\ngenerating such weak candidates to lead them in the
\npresidential election each year is only part of the reason
\nwhy they are pathetic.<\/p>\n
\nparty? Is he really a conservative or just someone who
\nhas a false consciousness that allows him to think that by
\nadopting the Republican label, he can skip the critical
\nthinking required to deal with complex problems?<\/p>\n
\nproblem he describes is really quite simple: avoid voting
\nfor either of the two evil people presented and vote for
\nsomeone else. Vote for one of the many current third-party
\ncandidates on the ballot and distance yourself from any
\nassociation with the false left right paradigm coughed up
\nto the voters every four years.<\/p>\n
\nbest friend or none-of-the above. Stay home and boycott
\nthe election. Call your friends and tell them to do the same!<\/p>\n
\nand create your own party: “find the niche and fill it” like
\na true (conservative) business person!<\/p>\n
\nsomeone you hate like Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump.
\nBig deal: that’s what you get anyway so why bother
\nwasting your valuable time and energy on someone you
\nknow is going to lose despite your efforts.<\/p>\n
\nBernie is adored by his millions of followers. Yet it has
\nbeen crystal clear for a very long time that he was never
\ngoing to get the Democratic nomination. Besides the
\nfact that he isn’t even a Democrat, Sanders had too many
\nbarriers to overcome just to defeat Hillary much less the
\nRepublican choice in the fall.<\/p>\n
\nmonths and are now faced with the grim reality that in a
\nfew days it will be all over. What a total waste to make
\nsome sort of statement that they care and that they at
\nleast “tried!”<\/p>\n
\neither too deluded or too lazy to do what it takes to change
\nthings in a way consistent with your authentic self.<\/p>\n
\nridden Hillary Clinton as their choice. Her only “legitimate”
\nclaim for the job is that it is time for a woman to have a
\nshot at the Oval Office.<\/p>\n
\npathetic pick that many will decide to stay home in
\nfrustration rather than hold their nose and vote for her.<\/p>\n
\nand remember a guy named Lincoln whom many label
\nas the best President of all. He was the nominee of the
\nnewly formed Republican Party that started only a few
\nyears earlier in Ripon, Wisconsin. http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29<\/a><\/p>\n
\nus have spent years in the wilderness praying that enough
\nAmericans would wake up and see how bad things are in |our political process.<\/p>\n
\nThe Tea Party wing has captured a big part of the
\nRepublican Party so that their nominee will not be a true
\nRepublican. Similarly, The Occupy Wall Street wing has
\ncaptured a big chunk of the Democratic vote although
\nwill likely lack the same level of success.<\/p>\n
\nother without them having formal status and being stuck
\nwith the corrupt, old label they pour their new wine into.<\/p>\n
\nsatisfying to work for something you truly believe in. How
\nmuch more intelligent to create an entity you believe in
\nthat reflects your values rather than the values attached
\nto an entity many find abhorrent.<\/p>\n
\nStreet Party. They are not going to win any elections in
\nthe near future but have the satisfaction of being true to
\ntheir values. http:\/\/twsp.us\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\nget off your butt; stop complaining about having to vote
\nfor the lesser-of-two-evils; and work to create something
\nthat is the better-of-two goods so the country has a choice they can be proud of.<\/p>\n