![\"wedding_rings\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/wedding_rings.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nA longtime county employee in Indiana has filed a lawsuit after she was fired for refusing to process a marriage-license application for a same-sex couple, arguing her civil and constitutional rights were violated.<\/p>\n
The complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana at New Albany by Linda G. Summers seeks an order preventing her boss from discriminating based on religion. She is seeking compensation for lost wages, earnings and benefits as well as punitive damages.<\/p>\n
The complaint names as defendants Harrison County Clerk Sally Whitis and the county.<\/p>\n
Summers, as a Christian, objected to being forced to provide for \u201csame-sex marriage\u201d paperwork. She told Whitis that other office employees were willing to take care of those duties when they arose.<\/p>\n
Summers was hired in 2008 and worked in the county\u2019s office in Corydon, Indiana. The complaint states she \u201chas a sincerely held religious belief, based upon the [tenets] of her faith and biblical teaching, such as Leviticus 18:22; Romans 1:26-27, 1 Cor. 6:89-10; and 1 Tim. 1:9-10, that it is a sin for persons of the same sex to engage in sexual relation.\u201d<\/p>\n
She believes \u201cthat persons of the same sex cannot and should not be morally or legally recognized as husband and wife,\u201d and that God will \u201cjudge individual Christians, as well as the society of which they are a part, who condone or institute same sex marriages.\u201d<\/p>\n
Whitis had emailed a demand in 2014 that all employees would have a \u201cduty\u201d to process same-sex marriage applications. When in December of that year a same-sex couple arrived at the office to apply, Summers \u201cinformed defendant Whitis that she felt that she could not prepare the appropriate paperwork.\u201d<\/p>\n
Later that day, she formally requested a \u201creligious accommodation\u201d and noted there were \u201ctwo other employees of the Harrison County clerk\u2019s office who had offered to [process papers] when such applications were received.\u201d<\/p>\n
Whitis responded the same day by firing her.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe foregoing discharge occurred without any attempt by the defendant to accommodate plaintiff and her religious beliefs,\u201d the complaint says, \u201cdespite the fact that plaintiff made her sincerely-held beliefs known to defendant Whitis; requested a reasonable accommodation; and that Section 1.4 of the Harrison County Personnel Policies Handbook provides, in relevant part that, \u2018it is the policy of the county of Harrison to provide equal employment opportunity in employment to all employees \u2026 and to prohibit discrimination in employment because of race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin.\u201d<\/p>\n
The case cites Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and federal law.<\/p>\n
The case alleges unlawful employment practices and discrimination based on religion and asks the court to \u201cmake whole the plaintiff for all earnings, wages, bonuses and other benefits (both past and future).\u201d<\/p>\n
The attorney filing the case is Earl C. Mullins of Louisville, Kentucky.<\/p>\n
When the U.S. Supreme Court in June created same-sex marriage in a case involving four states, the 5-4 majority opinion said people of faith still retained their right of religious exercise.<\/p>\n
A related dispute is developing in Kentucky, where the ACLU is suing a clerk in Rowan County for exercising her First Amendment religious rights.<\/p>\n
WND\u2019s attempt to obtain a comment from the clerk\u2019s office was unsuccessful on Wednesday.<\/p>\n
Read more at http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2015\/07\/christian-clerk-gay-marriages-violate-my-civil-rights\/#HwB8LQ2PPOd4juxE.99<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" CHRISTIAN CLERK: ‘GAY MARRIAGES’ VIOLATE MY CIVIL RIGHTS Claims government forcing her to sin Bob Unruh WND.com A longtime county employee in Indiana has filed a lawsuit after she was fired for refusing to process a marriage-license application for a … Continue reading