![\"\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/methode_times_prod_web_bin_a13e73bc-dfcf-11e9-bd86-784b242a2ca8.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
<\/p>\n
Here is the dirt Trump wanted from Zelensky about the Bidens and why Zelensky doesn\u2019t want to give it to him \u2014 hidden by rampant falsehoods in the press<\/h2>\n
by Eric Zuesse for The Saker Blog<\/strong><\/p>\n In order to understand why Ukraine\u2019s President Voldomyr Zelensky doesn\u2019t want the dirt about Joe Biden to become public, one needs to know that Hunter Biden\u2019s boss and benefactor at Burisma Holdings was, at least partly, Zelensky\u2019s boss and benefactor until Zelensky became Ukraine\u2019s President, and that revealing this would open up a can of worms which could place that former boss and benefactor of both men into prison at lots of places.<\/p>\n First, the falsehoods in the press have to be documented here, since this article will go up against virtually all U.S.-and-allied reporting on these events. And, in order to do such a thing, the bona fides of my main sources need to be presented:<\/p>\n Naked Capitalism is, as the article about it at Wikipedia<\/a>, says, the blog of Susan Webber, pen-named \u201cYves Smith,\u201d who \u201cgraduated from Harvard College<\/a> and Harvard Business School<\/a>. She had 20 years of experience in the financial services industry with Goldman Sachs<\/a>, McKinsey & Co.<\/a>, and Sumitomo Bank<\/a>.[3]<\/a> She has written articles for the New York Times<\/a>, Bloomberg<\/a>, and the Roosevelt Institute<\/a>.[4]<\/a>[5]<\/a>\u201d \u201cThe site has had over 60 million visitors since 2007, and was cited as among CNBC\u2019s 2012 top 25 \u2018Best Alternative Financial Blogs\u2019, calling Smith \u2018a harsh critic of Wall Street who believes that fraud was at the center of the financial crisis\u2019.[2]<\/a>\u201d \u201cThe New York Times<\/em> financial reporter Gretchen Morgenson<\/a> cited Naked Capitalism as one of the \u2018must-read financial blogs\u2019 she reads regularly.[9]<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n Her blog is widely respected amongst both scholars and experts in the field of finance, and is among the top go-to sites for trustworthy investigative news reporting in their highly complex field. So as to be able to achieve this high degree of respect, day in and day out, for decades, she carefully selects and relies upon the expertise of a small team of investigators, one of whom is Richard Smith, who has done around 200 articles for her site<\/a>. One of these was dated 21 May 2014 and headlined \u201cR. Hunter Biden Should Declare Who Really Owns His New Ukrainian Employer, Burisma Holdings\u201d<\/a>, and it reported that the U.S. Vice President\u2019s son had become \u201ca new member of the board\u201d<\/a> and that this \u201cUkrainian energy company has retained the counsel of the vice president\u2019s son and the Secretary of State\u2019s close family friend and top campaign bundler.\u201d Since these men were being paid by the corporation\u2019s owner, Mr. Smith researched extensively to find out who that was, or they were. He reported \u201cwhat one careful Ukrainian journalist\u00a0dug up<\/a>\u00a0in 2012\u201d:<\/p>\n \u201cBurisma changed owners last year [in 2011]: instead of Zlochevsky and Lisin, the company was taken over by a Cypriot off-shore enterprise called Brociti Investments Ltd. Pari and Esko-Pivnich\u201d and a \u201cthird company was already waiting for them in the same building \u2013 the above-mentioned Ukrnaftoburinnya,\u201d and \u201cThe Privat Group is the immediate owner. This company was founded by Mykola Zlochevsky some time ago, but he later sold his shares to the Privat Group,\u201d which \u201cis a conglomerate controlled by the ferocious Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky,\u201d who \u201cis one of the oligarchs\u00a0charged with holding down the Eastern provinces of Ukraine<\/a>,\u201d and who \u201cis far too ebulliently Jewish to look like a neo-Nazi. A US connection with Kolomoisky might play well in circles keen to counter Russian complaints that the interim Kiev regime is dominated by \u2018fascists\u2019.\u201d\u00a0Those quotations are from Mr. Smith\u2019s article, but the following is not. Examining the documents myself, I note especially that at their end is the conclusion: \u201cThus, Ihor Kolomoisky managed to seize the largest reserves of natural gas in Ukraine.\u201d This was the conclusion of the \u201ccareful Ukrainian journalist,\u201d which was actually not one but a team of three, who were employed at a Ukrainian non-profit, the Anticorruption Action Centre, which specialized in tracking down the actual persons who controlled corporations and which had a particular focus on finding \u201cOffshore fronts for Yanukovych.\u201d\u00a0Yanukovych was the democratically elected Ukrainian President, who took office on 25 February 2010. So: this non-profit was an anti-Yanukovych organization, writing more than two years into his Presidency, on 28 August 2012.<\/p>\n A certain historical background is essential here; and this, too, goes up against American \u2018news\u2019-reporting and will therefore be linked to articles that, in turn, link to ultimate sources that are of unquestioned reliability on each of the particulars that are in question: There was a coup in Ukraine in February 2014<\/a>, which is portrayed in the West as being a democratic revolution<\/a> (but was actually a coup<\/a> hidden behind anticorruption demonstrations, and that was entirely illegal<\/a>), and it replaced the democratically elected President by a ruler who was selected by Victoria Nuland, whose boss was Secretary of State John Kerry, whose boss was Barack Obama. Nuland had been originally a\u00a0prot\u00e9g\u00e9\u00a0of\u00a0Vice President Dick Cheney, and then of Kerry\u2019s immediate predecessor Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Obama assigned Nuland to carry out his plan for Ukraine, which plan was to turn its government away from being friendly toward its next-door neighbor Russia to becoming instead a satellite of the United States against Ukraine\u2019s next-door neighbor. Consequently, fascists, and even outright racist-fascists (nazis), people who came from the groups that had supported Hitler against Stalin during World War II, were installed into this new government, such as the co-founder of the\u00a0Social Nationalist Party of Ukraine,\u00a0Andriy Parubiy<\/a>. (The CIA instructed that Party, which was Ukraine\u2019s main nazi party, to change its name to \u201cFreedom Party\u201d \u2014 Svoboda \u2014 so as to become acceptable to Americans; and Paribuy and his colleagues did it, in order to help the U.S. Government to fool the American people about what the U.S. was doing in Ukraine.)<\/p>\n At least until Zelensky was elected, Ukraine\u2019s Government remained fascist<\/a>. And so is Kolomoysky himself, as I had reported about him on 18 May 2014<\/a>. As I reported there,<\/p>\n On 12 May 2014, Burisma Holdings announced, <\/em>\u201cHunter Biden Joins the Team of Burisma Holdings,\u201d<\/em><\/a> and reported that, \u201cBurisma Holdings, Ukraine\u2019s largest private gas producer, has expanded its Board of Directors by bringing on Mr. R Hunter Biden as a new director. R. Hunter Biden will be in charge of the Holdings\u2019 legal unit and will provide support for the Company among international organizations.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Promptly, Burisma\u2019s website started presenting Burisma as if if were a Ukrainian-American if not outright American corporation<\/a>. Devon Archer, shown there, was a business-partner of Hunter Biden. As the Washington Examiner<\/em>\u00a0 reported<\/a>, on 27 August 2019:<\/p>\n At the time, Hunter Biden, now 49, and Christopher Heinz, the stepson of then-Secretary of State John Kerry, co-owned Rosemont Seneca Partners, a $2.4 billion private equity firm. Heinz\u2019s college roommate, Devon Archer, was managing partner in the firm. In the spring of 2014, Biden and Archer joined the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company that was at the center of a U.K. money laundering probe. Over the next year, Burisma reportedly paid Biden and Archer\u2019s companies over $3 million.<\/em><\/p>\n Subsequently, both Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were removed from Burisma\u2019s board and replaced by a four-person board, which mysteriously had included ever since May 2013 (which still was after<\/em> Zlochevsky no longer controlled the company) Alan Apter<\/strong>, of Sullivan & Cromwell, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Renaissance Capital. Apter now became the \u201cChairman of the Board of Directors\u201d<\/a>. Here are the other three Directors: Aleksander Kwa\u015bniewski<\/strong> was the President of the Republic of Poland from 1995 to 2005 when it was being taken over by America, and when Kwa\u015bniewski was also a member of the Atlantic Council (NATO\u2019s PR arm), and of the Bilderberg Group. Joseph Cofer Black<\/strong> was the Director of the CIA\u2019s Counterterrorist Center (1999-2002) and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism (2002-2004), while President George W. Bush was lying America into invading Iraq<\/a>, and Black subsequently became the Vice Chairman at Blackwater Worldwide (now Academi), which the Bush Government hired to train and arm mercenaries to help conquer Iraq. (Blackwater\/Academi is owned by Erik Prince, the brother of Betsy DeVos of the Amway fortune, who is the Trump Secretary of Education, and Prince also is a personal friend of Trump. Obama\u2019s Government also hired Blackwater\/Academi to kill independence fighters in the Dnieper Donets Basin<\/a>, where Burisma owns the drilling rights for gas.) And the fourth Director is Karina Zlochevska<\/strong>, whom the site identifies hardly at all, but is actually the daughter of Mykola Zlochevsky<\/a>. In other words: Zlochevsky probably does remain as a minority owner of the company, and she represents his interests there.<\/p>\n Virtually all of the Western press simply alleges that Mykola Zlochevsky owns Burisma Holdings and brought Biden on board and was his boss; however, I have never seen from any of those \u2018news\u2019-reports any evidence or documentation that it\u2019s true \u2014 nothing like the sources that Richard Smith relied upon and linked to documenting that this was Kolomoysky\u2019s company. Nothing, at all.<\/p>\n This is important \u2014 is it Zlochevsky or Kolomoysky? \u2014 because Zlochevsky was associated with the prior<\/em> Government of Ukraine and its President Viktor Yanukovych, whom the U.S. Government had overthrown in an operation that started in 2011 and that ended very successfully in February 2014 with the American Government\u2019s Victoria Nuland on 27 January 2014 telling the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine to get \u201cYats\u201d Yatsenyuk appointed to run the country as soon as Yanukovych becomes successfully overthrown \u2014 which happened less than a month later, during February 20-22 \u2014 and Yatsenyuk then received the appointment on February 26th to run the country, just as Obama\u2019s agent Nuland had instructed.<\/a> Zlochevsky fled the country, because he had been politically allied with Yanukovych, who also fled the country. Obama\u2019s Government constantly tried to get Zlochevsky prosecuted for alleged corruption, but Zlochevsky had sold the company to Kolomoysky even before Obama took over Ukraine. It\u2019s not at all clear that Hunter Biden had ever so much as just met Zlochevsky.<\/p>\n Joseph Biden, as is well reported in the press, instructed the new Ukrainian Government to fire and replace the General Prosecutor of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin<\/a>, who had failed to prosecute Zlochevsky, and this action by Joe is reported as indicating that the senior Biden granted his son\u2019s employer no favor but instead the opposite \u2014 that Joe insisted upon Hunter\u2019s boss\u2019s prosecution.<\/p>\n For example, James Risen, of The Intercept, which is owned by one of the financial backers of the overthrow of Yanukovych, Pierre Omidyar (see this<\/a> and this<\/a> and this<\/a> and this<\/a> and this<\/a> and this<\/a>), headlined on September 25th, \u201cI Wrote About the Bidens and Ukraine Years Ago. Then the Right-Wing Spin Machine Turned the Story Upside Down.\u201d<\/a>, and Risen reported that:<\/p>\n The then-vice president\u00a0issued his demands for greater anti-corruption measures by the Ukrainian government despite the possibility that those demands would actually increase \u2013 not lessen \u2014 the chances that Hunter Biden and Burisma would face legal trouble in Ukraine.<\/em><\/p>\n Risen reported there that V.P. Biden\u2019s \u201canti-corruption message might be undermined by the association of his son Hunter with one of Ukraine\u2019s largest natural gas companies, Burisma Holdings, and with its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.\u201d<\/p>\n However, none of that press says Kolomoysky owned the company and was its boss. The presumption there is always that Zlochevsky needed to be prosecuted \u2014 not that Kolomoysky did. Kolomoysky is simply being written out of the picture altogether \u2014 whited-out from it<\/p>\n Also as is typical, the New York Times<\/em> reported, on 1 May 2019<\/a>, that Mykola Zlochevsky is the \u201cowner of Burisma Holdings\u201d and that \u201cMr. Lutsenko initially continued investigating Mr. Zlochevsky and Burisma, but cleared him of all charges within 10 months of taking office. The prosecutor general reversed himself and reopened an investigation into Burisma this year. Some see his decision as an effort to curry favor with the Trump administration.\u201d For some mysterious reason, that article not only says that the replacement Prosecutor tried and failed and now tried again to prosecute Zlochevsky but that \u201cSome see his decision as an effort to curry favor with the Trump administration,\u201d though, actually, it was the Obama<\/em> Administration that had been pressing Ukraine\u2019s Government to prosecute Zlochevsky, who wasn\u2019t Hunter Biden\u2019s boss and didn\u2019t control Burisma and was associated not with the 2014 Obama-installed Government of Ukraine but instead with the Government that had preceded it and was the last of all Ukraine\u2019s democratic Governments, having been democratically elected by all of Ukraine including the two regions (Crimea and Donbass) that broke away from Ukraine when Obama in February 2014 overthrew the Government that those two now-breakaway regions had voted for, by over 75% in that 2010 election.<\/p>\n And here is from Wikipedia\u2019s article on \u201cViktor Shokin\u201d:<\/p>\n The Biden connection<\/a>[<\/em>edit<\/em><\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n Since 2012, the Ukrainian prosecutor general had been investigating oligarch <\/em>Mykola Zlochevsky<\/em><\/a>, owner of the oil and natural gas company <\/em>Burisma Holdings<\/em><\/a>, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption.[15]<\/a><\/em> In 2014, then-U.S. Vice President <\/em>Joe Biden<\/em><\/a>\u2018s son, <\/em>Hunter Biden<\/em><\/a>, joined the board of directors of Burisma Holdings.[16]<\/a><\/em> In 2015, Shokin became the prosecutor general, inheriting the investigation. The Obama administration and other governments and <\/em>non-governmental organizations<\/em><\/a> soon became concerned that Shokin was not adequately pursuing corruption in Ukraine, was protecting the political elite, and was regarded as \u201can obstacle to anti-corruption efforts\u201d.[17]<\/a><\/em> Among other issues, he was slow-walking the investigation into Zlochevsky and Burisma \u2013 to the extent that Obama officials were considering launching their own criminal investigation into the company for possible money laundering.[15]<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n In March 2016, Joe Biden threatened Ukrainian President <\/em>Petro Poroshenko<\/em><\/a> that if he did not fire Shokin, that the US would hold back its $1 billion in loan guarantees. \u201cI looked at them and said, \u201cI\u2019m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you\u2019re not getting the money.\u201d Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.\u201d[18]<\/a><\/em> Shokin was dismissed by Parliament later that month.<\/em><\/p>\n Shokin claimed in May 2019 that he had been investigating Burisma Holdings.[19]<\/a>[20]<\/a>[21]<\/a>[22]<\/a><\/em> However, Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin\u2019s deputy overseeing international cooperation before resigning in February 2016 citing corruption in the office, provided documents to Bloomberg News indicating that under Shokin, the investigation into Burisma had been dormant.[23]<\/a><\/em> Hunter Biden\u2019s ties to Burisma Holdings was criticized as a conflict of interest in a New York Times editorial, though <\/em>Amos Hochstein<\/em><\/a> has claimed to have never seen coordination between Joe Biden and his son on the matter.[24]<\/a>[25]<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n And here is from Wikipedia\u2019s Article on \u201cBurisma Holdings\u201d:<\/p>\n History<\/a>[<\/em>edit<\/em><\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n Burisma Group was founded in 2002 by Ukrainian businessman <\/em>Mykola Zlochevsky<\/em><\/a> and <\/em>Nikolay Lysin<\/em><\/a> [<\/em>uk<\/em><\/a>]. Now it is owned by <\/em>Mykola Zlochevskyi<\/em><\/a> [<\/em>uk<\/em><\/a>], who was minister of natural resources under <\/em>Viktor Yanukovych<\/em><\/a>.<\/em>[2]<\/em><\/a> Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after the corruption investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him.<\/em>[3]<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n So, the myth that Zlochevsky was Hunter Biden\u2019s boss and benefactor at Burisma isn\u2019t only in the \u2018news\u2019-media that are controlled by U.S. Deep State that controls the CIA, which controls America\u2019s major \u2018news\u2019-media<\/a>, but it is also in the Web\u2019s main encyclopedia, Wikipedia, which is not only edited by the CIA<\/a>, but also, to some extent, written by the CIA<\/a>.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the CIA was the \u2018whistleblower\u2019 that made the impeachment-charge to the Democratic Party head of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Adam Schiff, who is the lead proponent of impeaching Donald Trump so that Trump can then become tried in the U.S. Senate, which then would possess the power to replace Trump and make President the current Vice President, Mike Pence, which Democrats, for some unexplained reason, seem to hope will happen. As Reuters reported on September 26th<\/a>, \u201cThe whistleblower is a CIA officer and was assigned at one point to work at the White House, two sources familiar with the probe into his complaint said. The New York Times first identified the whistleblower as a CIA officer, which Reuters confirmed.\u201d That report also asserted:<\/p>\n The call occurred after Trump had ordered a freeze of nearly $400 million in American aid to Ukraine, which was only later released. Before the call, Ukraine\u2019s government was told that interaction between Zelenskiy and Trump depended on whether the Ukrainian leader would \u201cplay ball,\u201d the whistleblower said.<\/em><\/p>\n The report said Trump acted to advance his personal political interests, risking national security.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cI am deeply concerned that the actions described below constitute \u2018a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, or violation of law or executive order,\u2019\u201d the whistleblower complaint, dated Aug. 12, said.<\/em><\/p>\n The same CIA whose lies had \u2018justified\u2019 America\u2019s invading Iraq in 2003, and invading Libya in 2011, and invading Syria starting in 2012 (and extending there up till at least 2018), is now \u2018justifying\u2019 congressional Democrats to replace Trump by Pence if they possibly can.<\/p>\n And Kolomoysky might be one of the world\u2019s biggest thieves. On 19 April 2019, Graham Stack reported for OCCRP<\/a>, a U.S.-and-allied-funded nonprofit anti-corruption investigatory organization that<\/p>\n \u201c\u2018Large-scale coordinated fraudulent actions of the bank <\/em>[PrivatBank] shareholders and management caused a loss to the state of at least $5.5 billion,\u2019 <\/em>[Valeria] Hontareva <\/em>[former chair of Ukranie\u2019s central bank] said in March 2018. \u2018This is 33 percent of the population\u2019s deposits \u2026 [and] 40 percent of our country\u2019s monetary base.\u2019 \u2026 By the time regulators took over PrivatBank, the $5.5 billion had already been transferred to banks in Austria, Luxembourg, and Latvia. From there, the trail goes cold. \u2026 This account is based on a forensic audit by Kroll, the U.S.-based corporate investigation and risk consulting firm. The report \u2026 is based on PrivatBank\u2019s own records and was obtained exclusively by OCCRP. \u2026 Ukraine nationalized PrivatBank in December 2016, saddling taxpayers with a $5.9 billion bailout.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n There\u2019s nothing that Zlochevsky was even accused of which exceeded tens of millions\u00a0 of dollars in losses<\/a>. In Ukraine, that\u2019s tiny.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the estimable and reliably accurate Moscow investigative journalist John Helmer reported on 19 February 2015<\/a> that \u201cIn March 2014, days after the ouster of Yanukovich in Kiev and the installation of a new regime, the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) started investigating Zlochevsky. According to the evidence it presented to the Central Criminal Court between March and December of 2014, and according to Justice Blake, who assessed the evidence, there is no mention of Lisin, Deripon, Burrard or Kolomoisky.\u201d Obama\u2019s people (there via the U.S. regime\u2019s lap-dog UK) were targeting Zlochevsky, certainly not<\/em> Kolomoysky, who was instead on their team.<\/p>\n Zelensky, prior to becoming Ukraine\u2019s President, had been the star of a popular comedy series on Ukrainian television that was telecast by Ihor Kolomoysky\u2019s 1+1 Media group. On 19 May 2014, Forbes<\/em> published a shockingly honest article, by Vladimir Golstein, \u201cWhy Everything You\u2019ve Read About Ukraine Is Wrong\u201d<\/a>, which mentioned, about Kolomoysky, that,<\/p>\n His business holdings include the largest Ukrainian media group, \u201c1+1 Media,\u201d the news agency \u201cUnian,\u201d as well as various internet sites, which enable him to whip public opinion into an anti-Putin frenzy. Andrew Higgins of The New York Times published a story with the headline, \u201cAmong Ukraine\u2019s Jews, the Bigger Worry is Putin, Not Pogroms,\u201d which praises Kolomoisky for adorning Dnepropetrovsk with \u201cthe world\u2019s biggest Jewish community center\u201d along with \u201ca high tech Holocaust museum.\u201d Higgins notes, however, that the museum \u201cskirts the delicate issue of how some Ukrainian nationalists collaborated with Nazis.<\/em><\/p>\n Kolomoysky himself had become installed by the Obama Administration\u2019s Ukrainian agents as the Governor of the Dnipropetrovsk<\/a> region of Ukraine where his approximately $5 billion financial empire was based, and which in its north extends into the Dnieper Donets Basin<\/a> where Burisma owns the drilling rights for gas. As this last link indicates, that Basin \u201cis the major oil and gas producing region of Ukraine accounting for approximately 90 per cent of Ukrainian production and according to EIA\u00a0<\/a> may have 42 tcf of shale gas resources technically recoverable from 197 tcf of risked shale gas in place.\u201d That article, from the investment-oriented website Zero Hedge, sums up:<\/p>\n In a nutshell, Ukraine (or <\/em>rather its puppetmasters<\/em><\/a>) has decided to let no crisis (staged or otherwise) or rather civil war, go to waste, and while the fighting rages all around, Ukrainian troopers are helping to install shale gas production equipment near the east Ukrainian town of Slavyansk, which was bombed and shelled <\/em>[by the Obama-installed Government] for the three preceding months, according to local residents cited by <\/em>Itar Tass<\/em><\/a>. The reason for the scramble? Under peacetime, the process was expected to take many years, during which Europe would be under the energy dictatorship of Putin. But throw in some civil war and few will notice let alone care that a process which was expected to take nearly a decade if not longer while dealing with broad popular objections to fracking, may instead be completed in months!<\/em><\/p>\n Ukraine\u2019s bombing of that region (for examples, this<\/a> and this<\/a> and this<\/a>) was in order to clear the land for a massive fracking operation. However, it turned out that not only Kolomoysky\u2019s operation with Shell in the Dnieper Donets Basin in Ukraine\u2019s far east, but also the Ukrainian Government\u2019s own gas-exploration operation with Chevron in western Ukraine\u2019s Olesska field, were uneconomic; or, as I headlined about them on 16 December 2014, \u201cUkraine\u2019s Two Big Gas Deals Are Now Both Dry\u201d<\/a>. It seems that if Hunter Biden is to become a billionaire, it won\u2019t come from Ukrainian gas. (Nor, of course will it have come from Zlochevsky, which the news-media would have it to be.)<\/p>\n As was reported on 20 May 2014 by Israel Shamir at the website of Paul Craig Roberts, under the headline \u201cThe Ukraine in Turmoil\u201d<\/a> (and his article there was the first comprehensive and accurate summary of what had recently happened to Ukraine):<\/p>\n These people had brought Ukraine to its present abject state. In 1991, the Ukraine was richer than Russia, today it is three times poorer because of these people\u2019s mismanagement and theft. Now they plan an old trick: to take loans in Ukraine\u2019s name, pocket the cash and leave the country indebted. They sell state assets to Western companies and ask for NATO to come in and protect the investment.<\/em><\/p>\n They play a hard game, brass knuckles and all. The Black Guard, a new SS-like armed force of the neo-nazi Right Sector, prowls the land. They arrest or kill dissidents, activists, journalists. Hundreds of American soldiers, belonging to the \u201cprivate\u201d company Academi (formerly Blackwater) are spread out in Novorossia<\/em> [Donbass, the far-eastern region that became independent after Obama\u2019s coup], the pro-Russian provinces in the East and South-East. IMF\u2013dictated reforms slashed pensions by half and doubled the housing rents. In the market, US Army rations took the place of local food.<\/em><\/p>\n The new Kiev regime had dropped the last pretence of democracy by expelling the Communists from the parliament. This should endear them to the US even more. Expel Communists, apply for NATO, condemn Russia, arrange a gay parade and you may do anything at all, even fry dozens of citizens alive. And so they did.<\/em><\/p>\n The harshest repressions were unleashed on industrial Novorossia, as its working class loathes the whole lot of oligarchs and ultra-nationalists. After the blazing inferno of Odessa and a wanton shooting on the streets of Melitopol the two rebellious provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk took up arms and declared their independence from the Kiev regime.<\/em><\/p>\n And then, to top it off, there is the brilliant pewreport blogger, who, on 27 July 2014, headlined \u201cUSAID to Help Young Biden: The Burisma File\u201d<\/a>, and that anonymous person succinctly laid out the use of the U.S. Government to enable the families of some of its top officials to join America\u2019s aristocracy, the billionaire class. It\u2019s something that Trump himself is intimately involved with and exploits, but if America\u2019s national and international police-agencies such as the FBI and CIA are trying (first with Russiagate, and now with Ukrainegate) to replace him by Pence in order to enable another friend of Obama to become installed (like Hillary was supposed to have been) as President and Commander-in-Chief, then this struggle between the agents of America\u2019s Democratic Party billionaires versus those of its Republican Party billionaires could end up having consequences that no one is predicting.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also important to point out here that Zelensky\u2019s predecessor, Poroshenko, was not Obama\u2019s first choice to win the 25 May 2014 Ukrainian election that followed the February 2014 coup and installation of Yatsenyuk to run the country on an interim basis. Yatsenyuk was supposed to run it until that election (after which Yatsenyuk still continued long in office, and Obama pushed as hard as possible for President Poroshenko to continue Prime Minister Yatsenyuk\u2019s policies). Obama\u2019s first choice \u2014 and the planned winner \u2014 in the 25 May 2014 election, was an intense hater of Russia, Yulia Tymoshenko<\/a>. Yatsenyuk had actually been her agent. Kolomoysky was perhaps her main financial backer.<\/a> But she lost the election to Obama\u2019s second choice, Poroshenko. Kolomoysky was enough of a supporter of Tymoshenko so that even after he returned to Ukraine on 16 May 2019 just prior to the latest Presidential election, he backed her even above Zelensky<\/a>. But above all, he opposed Poroshenko, because Poroshenko had been forced by the main lenders to his Government to fire Kolomoysky as governor of Dnipropetrovsk and to nationalize his bankrupt PrivatBank due to Kolomoysky\u2019s having been looting from Ukraine\u2019s Government too much money via his bank and via his minority ownership of the Government\u2019s gas company. Obama had wanted that money to go toward the war against Donbass, not into Kolomoysky\u2019s pockets. (However, America\u2019s Democratic-Party propaganda \u2018non-profit\u2019 Public Radio International gave a positive spin to Obama-team-member Kolomoysky even at the time of his firing by Poroshenko on 28 March 2015, saying of him<\/a>, \u201cHe offered $10,000 bounties for captured pro-Russian insurgents. \u2018People understand that this person came here to ensure stability,\u2019 said Stanislav Zholudev, a local political analyst.\u201d The euphemism \u201ccaptured pro-Russian insurgents\u201d was actually<\/em> referring to their corpses \u2014 Kolomoysky was paying only<\/em> for their corpses. Maybe for Obama-ites that\u2019s \u201cstability.\u201d Kolomoysky was already paying the nazi Azov Battalion<\/a> more than that per pro-Russian corpse, and now the Trump Administration wants Kolomoysky to be prosecuted for financial crimes instead of Zlochevsky to be prosecuted, and so Zelensky is being pushed one way by Democrats, and the opposite way by Republicans.) Kolomoysky has many enemies. The main holders of Ukraine\u2019s debt are unknown, but besides Russia which had lent to the pre-coup Government (and were thus trying to get their senior money that\u2019s owing from Ukraine to be paid to Russia before the newer creditors get theirs), they were said to be the IMF, America\u2019s Franklin Templeton Fund<\/a>, and Blackstone Group<\/a>, the World Bank<\/a>, and a group of mainly American billionaires \u201cand private Eurobond holders\u201d who are represented by the law firm of Weil Gotshal & Manges<\/a>. The U.S. Government and EU countries were also said to be<\/a> indirectly such holders via their ownership shares in the IMF and World Bank, but also perhaps more directly. (If Trump were a decent President, he\u2019d be publicly pressing for the exact numbers on all of this.) Kolomoysky\u2019s siphonings from Ukraine\u2019s Government were at the expense of all of them. The pressures upon Poroshenko to halt it were mounting. And, so, Kolomoysky was fired; and, now, to the extent that Zelensky has to satisfy Kolomoysky, Zelensky (who publicly said of Kolomoysky \u201cHe is my business partner\u201d<\/a>) needs to resist some of the demands of the U.S. regime and of many other billionaires. Without their continued support, Ukraine\u2019s Government will collapse in the short term instead of only (which is inevitable) in the long term. It\u2019s no longer just a question of the Ukrainian regime\u2019s war against Donbass. The change that Obama wrought is permanent, and Trump dithers back and forth about how to deal with it. He apparently has no strategy on that.<\/p>\n Zelensky might fear that if he complies with Trump\u2019s request, then his own major benefactor, Kolomoysky, could end up in prison somewhere; and Trump might fear that if he presses Zelensky on that (as he did not do but Democrats say he did), then the entire Deep State \u2014 not only Democratic Party billionaires, but also now Republican ones \u2014 will become Trump\u2019s enemies, and his 2020 re-election chances will therefore go to zero. Consequently: Trump will probably abandon the matter, and the till-now-unsupported and maybe unsupportable mere assumption, that Hunter Biden\u2019s Ukrainian benefactor was Zlochevsky instead of Kolomoysky, will continue to be asserted virtually everywhere throughout the U.S. empire, for as long a time as the matter continues to remain in the \u2018news\u2019. Of course, if that turns out to be the case, then Joe Biden will continue to be portrayed in this matter as having been a crusader against corruption in Ukraine, instead of as having been the aspiring founder of yet another billionaire American dynasty.<\/p>\n Basically, the new Russiagate charges to replace Trump by Pence, Ukrainegate (as those charges were presented by the CIA \u2018whistleblower\u2019 on August 12th<\/a> and published on September 26th), represent all of the Democratic Party\u2019s billionaires, and many of the Republican Party\u2019s ones, as well. It\u2019s the pinnacle of the Obama-versus-Trump feud, because it represents the Democratic Party\u2019s position on what was Obama\u2019s top international achievement \u2014 his conquest (via a coup) against Ukraine. Trump refuses to condemn Obama\u2019s coup against Ukraine, but if he cared about the truth, he would, and the worst that could happen to him then would be that, for once in his life, he\u2019d be fighting for truth, and not just for himself. Apparently, that\u2019s too big a leap for him to take.<\/p>\n What\u2019s especially pathetic in all of this is that whenever the U.S. Government overthrows and destroys a country, it\u2019s trumpeted as reflecting America\u2019s standing-up for rule-of-law and opposition to corruption, and for support of democracy and protection of human rights; but whenever Russia or a nation that\u2019s friendly toward Russia resists control by the U.S. and its allies, it\u2019s portrayed as being a dictatorship and an opponent of democracy and of human rights. So, go figure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0\u00a0They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/em><\/a>,<\/em>\u00a0and of \u00a0CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n