I<\/span>n Room 270, the records management unit, on the second floor of an imposing granite and marble courthouse in lower Manhattan, 167 documents totaling more than 2,000 pages are being kept under lock and key.<\/p>\n But they are about to be unsealed and made public – making a host of important people around the world, including celebrities, politicians and royals, very nervous.<\/p>\n The files contain explosive allegations in the case of Giuffre v Maxwell, in which Virginia Giuffre, a woman who\u00a0claims to have been<\/a>\u00a0Jeffrey Epstein’s teenage “sex slave”, sued Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite and the billionaire’s former girlfriend, for defamation.<\/p>\n The case was settled in May 2017 on the eve of the trial\u00a0but the details\u00a0were not disclosed\u00a0and the final judgment and supporting documents were sealed,\u00a0with the court noting the “highly sensitive nature of the underlying allegations.”<\/p>\n According to other court documents that have been published, Ms Giuffre has\u00a0made allegations of sexual abuse against “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well\u2010known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.”<\/p>\n An appeal to unseal the rest of the documents was launched by the Miami Herald newspaper, which has spearheaded media investigations into Epstein. It was rejected three times.<\/p>\n Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell became a fixture on the New York social scene after she moved to the city in 1991 CREDIT: JOE SCHILDHORN\/PATRICK MCMULLAN VIA GETTY IMAGES<\/p><\/div>\n B<\/span>ut last month the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ordered their release, ruling that the public’s right to know outweighed the privacy rights of the high-profile individuals named.<\/p>\n I<\/span>t what may be an indication of the fame of those individuals, the judges made a striking plea to the media to “exercise restraint” in reporting the allegations about to come to light. They also allowed parties involved to apply for minor redactions, delaying the release.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Another delay is possible as Miss Maxwell has launched an appeal to keep the documents sealed, her lawyers arguing that a full release would trigger a \u201cfurious feeding frenzy.”<\/p>\n They wrote: “Plaintiff Giuffre made numerous allegations of sexual, if not criminal, conduct against a wide range of third parties. Because of the media no reference to anyone in this case is benign: a reference to any person is toxic and lethal to that person\u2019s reputation. Facts and truth are all but irrelevant.”<\/p>\n The legal battle between Ms Giuffre and Miss Maxwell began in late 2014 when Ms Giuffre claimed that Epstein sexually abused her starting in 2000 when she was 16, with the \u201cassistance and participation\u201d of Miss Maxwell. She also made\u00a0allegations against the Duke of York<\/a>, which were categorically denied by Buckingham Palace.<\/p>\n Miss Maxwell described the claims as “obvious lies,” and Ms Giuffre then sued her for defamation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n I<\/span>n a recent statement Josh Schiller, a lawyer for Ms Giuffre, said the appeal court was unlikely to overturn an unsealing decision, and he believed Miss Maxwell’s appeal would cause only a “short delay” in releasing the documents. He added: “There is an overwhelming public interest.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/TELEMMGLPICT000204121467_trans_NvBQzQNjv4Bqr-PUhm4quBOBMTkkuONSzNSeo3igTjVzl47_ErAAdmk.jpg\"){kind=spacer}
<\/a><\/div>
<\/a>Ghislaine Maxwell, right, and Jeffrey Epstein, with Donald and Melania Trump at the Mar-a-Lago club in 2000 CREDIT: DAVIDOFF STUDIOS\/GETTY IMAGES<\/p><\/div>\n
by Nick Allen
\nThe Telegraph<\/span><\/p>\n