{"id":113789,"date":"2019-01-16T10:38:44","date_gmt":"2019-01-16T14:38:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=113789"},"modified":"2019-01-16T10:40:45","modified_gmt":"2019-01-16T14:40:45","slug":"what-you-need-to-know-about-5g-microwave-radiation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=113789","title":{"rendered":"What you need to know about 5G microwave radiation!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Factual Microwave Radiation Research Consumers Need To Know Before Embracing 5G<\/h1>\n

By\u00a0Catherine J. Frompovich
\nNatural Living<\/p>\n

Microwave technology seems to have been around \u2018forever\u2019, so that\u2019s probably why very few tech consumers question its safety. However, consumers should know the latest and most \u2018coveted\u2019 update to technology is the\u00a0Internet of Things<\/em><\/strong>, which will become\u00a0\u201cBig Brother Personified.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Not only will the\u00a0IoT<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0report back (i.e., spy?) to\u00a0high-speed computer data centers<\/a>\u00a0consumers EVERY activity<\/em>,\u00a0IoT<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0will super-saturate your physical body and brain with extremely rapid oscillation Gigahertz (GHz) frequencies needed to implement\u00a0IoT<\/em><\/strong>, which probably will become physically uncomfortable, as being reported by current research studies.<\/p>\n

The U.S. military has pressed hard for each generation of microwave updates to the point where 5G is their \u201cwar weapon\u201d that will be pressed in to civilian use for higher speed Wi-Fi.<\/p>\n

Personally, I\u2019ve been a health issues researcher\/writer\/author since the late 1970s and the plans for expanded microwave technologies,\u00a0e.g., 5G and higher<\/em>, cause me grave concern, especially because of the resolute lack of transparency concerning the harms from its thermal and non-thermal waves,\u00a0which deliberately have been secreted from consumers<\/em><\/strong>\u2014similar to what the tobacco industry and other vested interests have done in order to mainstream technologies harming human health, wildlife, the environment and ruined the Planet\u2019s hydrologic system by implementing\u00a0Solar Radiation Management<\/em><\/strong>, which some refer to as \u201cchemtrails.\u201d<\/p>\n

With the last paragraph\u2019s concerns in mind<\/em>, I\u2019ve gotten together an anthology of probable lesser-known Microwave, ELF, EMF, RFR research I think consumers should know\u2014and save\u2014to understand how the proverbial wool has been pulled over your eyes about a technology you have fallen in love with; become addicted to; and are clamoring for more and higher generation speeds, while really not knowing nor understanding the harm it is doing to you and especially the children, who are the most vulnerable to cellular damage.<\/p>\n

>>>A Retrospective Microwave Research Anthology<\/u><<<<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation, Proceedings on an International Symposium, October,\u00a01973<\/u>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>[October 15-18, 1973, Warsaw, Poland]<\/p>\n

Reviewed by\u00a0Emanuel Landau<\/a><\/p>\n

Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation, Proceedings on an International Symposium,<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0October, 1973. Poland Government, WHO and USHEW. Polish Medical Publishers.<\/em><\/p>\n

347 pp. 1974. $10 U.S.A., $12.50 Foreign. NTIS PB 239-554.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThis volume represents the proceedings of the only truly international symposium on the effects of\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>microwave radiation which was held in Warsaw in October, 1973<\/em><\/strong>. In addition to the presented papers of the participants, the work contains succinct summaries of the discussions and\u00a0a list of sound conclusions and recommendations. Differences in research findings are not glossed over.<\/strong>\u00a0Particularly impressive to this reviewer is the absence of ideological statements and judgments.\u00a0It is a \u201cmust\u201d book for any serious student of the health effects of exposure to microwave radiation.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cWhile this publication does not and cannot present definitive findings,\u00a0it does represent a valuable state of the art review with all the inconsistencies and disagreements noted and discussed.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

A special merit is that it makes possible more details of the studies done by the leading research investigators for both high and low level exposure situations than has been previously available.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Even more detail is needed for proper assessment, but this symposium clearly will contribute to the necessary reconciliation of the wide divergence of\u00a0research results reported for cataractogenesis and \u201cmicrowave neurosis\u201d as well as for other stated adverse effects.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Emanuel Landau, PhD<\/em>
\nAPHA Project Director<\/em>
\nEnvironmental Health Hazards<\/em>
\nSource:\u00a0https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1775882\/pdf\/amjph00794-0077c.pdf<\/a><\/em>
\nAm J Public Health<\/a>. 1975 July; 65(7): 751. PMCID: PMC1775882<\/p>\n

[CJF emphasis]
\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1775882\/?page=1<\/a><\/p>\n

Session A.<\/strong>\u00a0General Effects of Microwave Radiation<\/em>\u00a0(80 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-a1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session A continued<\/strong>\u00a0(27 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-a2-1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session B.<\/strong>\u00a0Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Nervous System and Behavior<\/em>\u00a0(23 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-b1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session B continued<\/strong>\u00a0(20 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-b2.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session C.<\/strong>\u00a0Effects of Microwave Radiation at the Cellular and Molecular Level<\/em>\u00a0(40 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-c1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session C continued<\/strong>\u00a0(10 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-c2.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session D.<\/strong>\u00a0Measurements of Microwave Radiation\u00a0<\/em>(58 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-d.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session E<\/strong>.\u00a0Occupational Exposure and Public Health Aspects of Microwave Radiation<\/em>\u00a0(48 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-e.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session F<\/strong>.\u00a0Presentation and Discussion of Session Reports, Conclusions (Including Future Research\u00a0<\/em>Needs) and Recommendations<\/em>\u00a0(27 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-f.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Session I.<\/strong>\u00a0List of Participants<\/em>\u00a0(15 pages)
\nhttps:\/\/www.elettrosensibili.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/biologic-effects-health-hazards-of-mw-i.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

A Mother\u2019s Tragic Story about In-school Wi-Fi Damage<\/strong>\u00a0to her 15-year-old daughter, who suffered with EHS from Wi-Fi in school, which finally led to the daughter\u2019s eventual suicide:Why Die for Wi-Fi? My Child Did \u2013 Will Yours?<\/a>\u00a0\/ Debra Fry, May 3, 2016<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

A pioneer researcher, the late Dr. Ross Adey, in his last publication in Bioelectromagnetic Medicine (P. Roche and M. Markov, eds. 2004) concluded:<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are major unanswered questions about possible health risks that may arise from exposures to various man-made electromagnetic fields where these human exposures are intermittent, recurrent, and may extend over a significant portion of the lifetime of the individual.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cEpidemiological studies have evaluated ELF and radiofrequency fields as possible risk factors for human health, with historical evidence relating rising risks of such factors as progressive rural electrification, and more recently, to methods of electrical power distribution and utilization in commercial buildings. Appropriate models describing these bioeffects are based in non-equilibrium thermodynamics, with nonlinear electrodynamics as an integral feature. Heating models, based in equilibrium thermodynamics, fail to explain an impressive new frontier of much greater significance.<\/p>\n

\u2026.. Though incompletely understood, tissue free radical interactions with magnetic fields may extend to zero field levels.\u201d (2)<\/p>\n

Source:<\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012*, Section 1 (Summary for the Public),\u00a0Pg. 7\/22 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Children are at increased risks from Radiofrequencies (RFs) emitted by microwaves according to the Presidential Cancel Panel 2010 and the American Academy of Pediatricians.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is little doubt that exposure to ELF causes childhood leukemia.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Source:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012*,\u00a0Pg. 8\/23 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

What is remarkable about studies on DNA, genes and proteins and EMFs is that there should be no effect at all if it were true that EMFs is too weak to cause damage. Scientists who believe that the energy of EMFs is insignificant and unlikely to cause harm have a hard time explaining these changes, so are inclined to just ignore them. The trouble with this view is that the effects are occurring. Not being able to explain these effects is not a good reason to consider them imaginary or unimportant.<\/p>\n

Source:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012*, Section 1,\u00a0Pg. 16\/31 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Sixteen nations:<\/strong>\u00a0Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Namibia, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom have ruled the thermal RF radiation levels set by the National Council of Radiation Protection (NCP), the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are obsolete and do not adequately protect the public, so they are taking action to mitigate public risks.<\/p>\n

Source:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

\u201cThe IARC Monographs classification of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) covers the\u00a0entire radiofrequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum (30 kHz-300 GHz).<\/strong>\u00a0Within this spectrum, the electromagnetic fields around (or the radiation emitted by) mobile telephones represent the most intense and most wide-spread exposure situation, for which a small increase in risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma has been found in the group of \u2018heavy users\u2019.\u00a0Other devices\u00a0<\/strong>that emit the same type of RF radiation \u2013 base-station antennas, radio\/tv antennas, WiFi stations,\u00a0<\/strong>smart meters \u2013 fall under the same evaluation.<\/strong>\u00a0However, because the exposure levels for many of these other devices and exposure situations are so much lower than the exposure to someone who has a functioning cell phone against her\/his ear, the risk will be considerably less (although the hazard still exists).\u201d [CJF emphasis]<\/p>\n

Source:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012*, Section 22 (Precaution in Action \u2013 Global Public Health Advice Following BioInitiative),<\/strong>\u00a0Pg. 28\/1325 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

The US Government Accountability Office published a report in 2012 urging the US Federal Communications Commission to revisit the outdated safety standards for the exposures from wireless devices. (19)<\/p>\n

Source:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0BioInitiative 2012*, Section 22,\u00a0Pg. 18\/1315 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

The Report noted that the FCC\u2019s RF energy exposure limit may not reflect the latest research.<\/em><\/p>\n

Source<\/em><\/strong>: BioInitiative 2012*,\u00a0Section 22 Pg. 19\/1316 of 1479<\/a><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Adverse health effects occur at levels much lower than what the FCC claims to be safe.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Non-thermal adverse health effects from microwave RFs have been documented at extremely low power densities in these ranges:\u00a0microwatt, nanowatt, picowatt and femtowatt.<\/em><\/p>\n