![\"\"](\"http:\/\/themillenniumreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Screen-Shot-2018-12-11-at-5.56.03-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe U.S. Government\u2019s Plan Is to Conquer Russia by a Surprise Invasion<\/h2>\n
by Eric Zuesse for The Saker Blog<\/p>\n
The following combination of articles explains \u2014 and they link to conclusive evidence proving \u2014 that the United States Government is actually designing its nuclear forces now with the intention to win a nuclear war against Russia (World War III), and no longer (if they ever really were<\/a>) adhering to the idea (\u201cMutually Assured Destruction\u201d) that WW III would produce unacceptable catastrophe for both sides, and must therefore be prevented. The U.S. Government is definitely set upon winning WW III, not avoiding WW III. Nuclear weapons are thus being built and deployed by the U.S. Government with the intention to conquer Russia, and this goal has become NATO\u2019s mission, and its only remaining core function, though this fact is not publicly acknowledged. Here are these articles, and their key quotes, showing this:<\/p>\n 1: https:\/\/fas.org\/blogs\/<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cBack in 2011, before the B61-12 development program had progressed to the point of no return, FAS sent a letter<\/a> to the White House and the Office of the Secretary of Defense pointing out the contradiction with the administration\u2019s policy and implications for nuclear strategy. They never responded.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n 2: http:\/\/www.voltairenet.org\/<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cAs from March 2020, the United States will begin to deploy in Italy, Germany, Belgium, and Holland (where B-61 nuclear bombs are already based), and probably also in other European countries, the first nuclear bomb with precision guidance in their arsenal, the B61-12. Its function is primarily anti-Russian. This new bomb is designed with penetrating capacity, enabling it to explode underground in order to destroy the central command bunkers with its first strike. How would the United States react if Russia deployed nuclear bombs in Mexico, right next to their territory?\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n 3: http:\/\/www.unz.com\/article\/<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe US nuclear forces modernization program has been portrayed to the public as an effort to ensure the reliability and safety of warheads in the US nuclear arsenal, rather than to enhance their military capabilities. In reality, however, that program has implemented revolutionary new technologies that will vastly increase the targeting capability of the US ballistic missile arsenal. This increase in capability is astonishing \u2014 boosting the overall killing power of existing US ballistic missile forces by a factor of roughly three \u2014 and it creates exactly what one would expect to see, if a nuclear-armed state were planning to have the capacity to fight and win a nuclear war by disarming enemies with a surprise first strike.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n 4: https:\/\/off-guardian.org\/2017\/<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe U.S. government\u2019s plan to conquer Russia is based upon a belief in, and the fundamental plan to establish, \u2018Nuclear Primacy\u2019 against Russia \u2014 an American ability to win a nuclear war against, and so conquer, Russia.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n CONCLUSIONS<\/b><\/p>\n The U.S. Government\u2019s statements to the public, alleging that Russia is the \u2018aggressor\u2019<\/a>, and that the U.S. Government designs its nuclear program only<\/b> for \u2018defense\u2019 against Russia and other nations, is as much of a lie<\/a> as was the U.S. Government\u2019s statement in 2002 that Iraq needed to be invaded because the IAEA had found (which it never did) that Iraq was within six months of having a nuclear bomb<\/a>. The U.S. Government is not to be trusted \u2014 no more now than it was then. And also the U.S. regime invaded and destroyed Libya, and Syria, and Yemen, on the basis of lies<\/a>. No such serial liar should be trusted.<\/p>\n The U.S. regime\u2019s real goal is conquest and control of the entire world \u2014 including especially Russia<\/a>. After the end of the Soviet Union, and of its communism, and of its Warsaw Pact military alliance that had been established in order to defend against America\u2019s NATO military alliance, there is no excuse for this.<\/i> The U.S. regime\u2019s guilt here is especially outrageous regarding Russia, because invading Russia would destroy the entire world.<\/p>\n The U.S. regime\u2019s craving to control the entire world is sheer evil, and is \u2018justified\u2019 entirely on lies<\/a> (such as the lie that Putin had \u201cseized\u201d<\/a> Crimea \u2014 this being the alleged \u2018justification\u2019 for NATO\u2019s ramping up troops and missiles on and near Russia\u2019s borders). One of these lies is that \u201cPutin wants to conquer Ukraine\u201d<\/a>. Only the grossest of fools could believe that<\/a>. But it\u2019s not just the Crimea-Ukraine issue where the U.S. regime lies: All U.S. sanctions against Russia are based on clearly proven lies<\/a>.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the U.S. regime\u2019s increasing moves towards a police-state if not toward ultimately military law<\/a> for Americans, are drastically reducing Americans\u2019 own freedoms, and this is extremely bad for the American people. The increasing percentages of the U.S. Government\u2019s spending that go to the military have also been spreading poverty and concentrating wealth<\/a> in the aristocracy; so, only America\u2019s billionaires are benefiting from this imperialism, even within the U.S.<\/p>\n The United States Government is no \u2018democracy\u2019<\/a>, and it has now become the enemy of the entire world, except of the regimes that rule its allied countries, but even its allied countries will be immiserated by such a war as America\u2019s rulers are preparing, on behalf of the owners of Lockheed Martin and other such corporations.<\/p>\n The U.S. regime is the enemy of publics everywhere. It is the biggest threat to the world in all of human history, if Hitler\u2019s regime wasn\u2019t that. And it will be worse even than Hitler\u2019s regime, if its military bases and personnel aren\u2019t expelled from every country before the secretly planned blitz-invasion of Russia ultimately occurs. Only doing that could now prevent such an attack. If this won\u2019t be done, then NATO\u2019s invasion of Russia will. It has come down to that choice, for each and every nation.<\/p>\n On 20 October 2016, NBC News bannered \u201cPhilippine Leader Duterte Ditches U.S. for China, Says \u2018America Has Lost\u2019\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n On 1 May 2017, Global Research headlined an opinion-article, \u201cNo More Crimes Against Peace: Why Canada Must Leave NATO Now\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n Europe\u2019s emerging competitor to America\u2019s NATO is called \u201cPermanent Structured Cooperation\u201d<\/a>, a dull name so as to avoid especially the U.S. public\u2019s attention. It was announced on 8 September 2017<\/a>, and then established on 11 December 2017, with a list of \u201cAmbitious and more binding common commitments\u201d and<\/a> with 25 EU Member States (all of the 28 EU members except: UK, Denmark, and Malta), signing onto those commitments. Its creation was the start of the end of NATO<\/a>. This has been inevitable ever since the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014 and installation there of a nazi regime<\/a>, which the U.S. regime had planned to become a member both of NATO and of the EU.<\/p>\n On 9 November 2019<\/u><\/a>, U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted, \u201cPresident Macron of France has just suggested that Europe build its own military in order to protect itself from the U.S., China and Russia. Very insulting, but perhaps Europe should first pay its fair share of NATO, which the U.S. subsidizes greatly!\u201d Perhaps Macron wants to keep France out of WW III. Perhaps, also, Macron wants France to be free to determine its own international policies without needing to adhere to the demands of America\u2019s billionaires, especially the demands which America\u2019s billionaires share with Saudi Arabia\u2019s royal family and Israel\u2019s billionaires,*<\/b> such as to conquer Syria so as to install there a leader who would be chosen by King Saud and cooperate with America\u2019s billionaires<\/a>. For example: on December 7th, Al Masdar News headlined \u201cSyria accuses US Coalition of completely destroying hospital in Deir Ezzor\u201d<\/a>. Deir Ezzor is Syria\u2019s oil-producing region, and the U.S. regime and its allies want to steal Syria\u2019s oil and they\u2019ve therefore been trying for years to destroy the Government\u2019s infrastructures and grab control there<\/a>.<\/p>\n To understand the broader geostrategic context<\/a> in which these daily events are happening, click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n NOTE: There is a possibility that Ukraine might, on December 14th<\/a>, invade its former Donbass region and provoke there a Russian response that the U.S. regime might use as a pretext to invade Russia, but I doubt that the U.S. regime yet feels confident enough that it possesses \u201cNuclear Primacy\u201d so as to invade Russia at the present time. So, if such a Ukrainian invasion occurs, the Ukrainian regime, which was installed by the American regime<\/a>, might turn out to be disappointed.<\/p>\n \u2014\u2014<\/p>\n *<\/b> On November 27th, \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s full Washington Post interview transcript, annotated\u201d<\/a> included Trump\u2019s fullest explanation, to-date, on why he will not blame Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud for Khashoggi\u2019s murder: \u201cThey\u2019ve been a great ally. Without them, Israel would be in a lot more trouble. We need to have a counterbalance to Iran. \u2026 It\u2019s very, very important to maintain that relationship. It\u2019s very important to have Saudi Arabia as an ally, if we\u2019re going to stay in that part of the world. Now, are we going to stay in that part of the world? One reason to is Israel. Oil is becoming less and less of a reason because we\u2019re producing more oil now than we\u2019ve ever produced. So, you know, all of a sudden it gets to a point where you don\u2019t have to stay there\u201d (other than to do the will of Israel\u2019s billionaires, and of America\u2019s billionaires who also share in the control of Israel\u2019s Government). An astute observer<\/a> noted about that comment from Trump:<\/p>\n \u201cAs Trump explains now that he holds not only the relations with the Saudis, in order to serve Israel\u2019s interests, but that Israel is \u201ca reason\u201d for the US and its troops remain in the region. With that, Trump has broken a long-standing taboo, because the simple information that Israeli interests are the reason that the US and its troops are in the region, has so far tried to suppress the Zionist lobby with great force and quite successfully. After all, the naked truth does not sound good to the Zionist regime and its henchmen: rows of bombed and destroyed countries, thousands of dead US soldiers and many more cripples, trillions of dollars in costs, and what this all is about: Israel.<\/i>\u201d<\/p>\n Like many traditionalists, that observer refuses to consider that the royal Saud family might be dominant over the Jewish billionaires, instead of vice-versa such as is the case because the Sauds control the exchange-rate of the dollar and the Jewish billionaires don\u2019t even control much oil at all. But that\u2019s a relatively minor disagreement, in the present context.<\/p>\n