ZeroHedge.com<\/p>\n
The UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, otherwise known as MI6, has been scrambling to prevent President Trump from publishing classified materials linked to the Russian election meddling investigation, according to\u00a0The\u00a0Telegraph<\/a>,<\/em>\u00a0stating that any disclosure would “undermine intelligence gathering if he releases pages of an FBI application to wiretap one of his former campaign advisers.”<\/p>\n Trump’s allies, however,\u00a0are fighting back<\/strong>\u00a0– demanding transparency and suggesting that the UK wouldn’t want the documents withheld unless it had something to hide.<\/p>\n The Telegraph has talked to more than a dozen UK and US officials, including in American intelligence, who have revealed details about the row.<\/p>\n British spy chiefs have \u201cgenuine concern\u201d about sources being exposed if classified parts of the wiretap request were made public, according to figures familiar with discussions.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cIt boils down to the exposure of people<\/strong>\u201d, said one US intelligence official, adding: \u201cWe don\u2019t want to reveal sources and methods<\/strong>.\u201d US intelligence shares the concerns of the UK.<\/p>\n Another said Britain feared setting a dangerous \u201cprecedent\u201d which could make people less likely to share information, knowing that it could one day become public. –The\u00a0Telegraph<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The\u00a0Telegraph\u00a0<\/em>adds that the UK’s dispute with the Trump administration is so politically sensitive that staff within the British Embassy in D.C. haver been barred from discussing it with journalists. Theresa May has also “been kept at arms-length and is understood to have not raised the issue directly with the US president.”<\/p>\n In September<\/a>, we reported that the\u00a0British government “expressed grave concerns” over the material in question after\u00a0President Trump issued an order to the DOJ to release a wide swath of materials<\/strong>, “immediately” and “without redaction.”<\/p>\n Trump\u00a0walked that order back<\/a>\u00a0days later\u00a0after the UK begged him not to release them<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Mr Trump wants to declassify 21 pages from one of the applications. He announced the move in September, then backtracked, then this month said he was “very seriously” considering it again. Both Britain and Australia are understood to be opposing the move.<\/p>\n Memos detailing alleged ties between Mr Trump and Russia compiled by\u00a0Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer<\/a>, were cited in the application, which could explain some of the British concern.\u00a0–The\u00a0Telegraph<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The\u00a0New York\u00a0<\/em>Times<\/em><\/a>\u00a0reported at the time\u00a0that the UK’s concern was over material\u00a0which\u00a0“includes direct references to conversations between American law enforcement officials and Christopher Steele<\/u>,<\/strong>”\u00a0<\/strong>the former MI6 agent who compiled the infamous “Steele Dossier.” The UK’s objection, according to former US and British officials, was over revealing Steele’s identity in an official document, “regardless of whether he had been named in press reports.”<\/p>\n I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies\u2019 called to ask not to release. Therefore, the Inspector General…..<\/p>\n — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n