{"id":105094,"date":"2018-09-29T17:18:46","date_gmt":"2018-09-29T21:18:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=105094"},"modified":"2018-09-29T21:55:50","modified_gmt":"2018-09-30T01:55:50","slug":"huge-red-flag-did-phd-christine-blasey-ford-even-write-her-letter-to-feinstein","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=105094","title":{"rendered":"HUGE RED FLAG! Did PhD Christine Blasey Ford even write her letter to Feinstein?<\/i><\/b>"},"content":{"rendered":"

BOMBSHELL: Christine Blasey Ford\u2019s letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein revealed to be a total FAKE\u2026 contains 14 glaring errors that could only be committed by a poorly educated writer<\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

by Mike Adams<\/p>\n

(Natural News<\/a>) A bombshell revelation is rocking the political world today as it is revealed the letter released by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who claims the letter was written by Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford, is a fake that could not possibly have been authored by Ford.<\/p>\n

Inconsistencies in the letter were first noticed by Dannielle Blumenthal PhD (@DrDannielle on Twitter). I have conducted significant additional analysis (see below) and included the problems noticed by Dr. Blumenthal. In total, there are now\u00a0fourteen errors or problems<\/strong>\u00a0in the \u201cDr. Ford\u201d letter that indicate it was not authored by Dr. Ford.<\/p>\n

Both Dr. Blumenthal and I are imminently qualified to assess the writing level and composition of letters and articles. Dr. Blumenthal has a Ph.D. in sociology and a bachelor\u2019s degree in interdisciplinary studies with a focus on creative writing (h\/t to\u00a0The Gateway Pundit<\/a>). She has been a professional writer for 30 years and spent 2.5 years handling constituent letters sent to members of Congress. For my part, I have a bachelor\u2019s degree in interdisciplinary studies with a focus on\u00a0technical<\/em>\u00a0writing. As the editor of one of the largest independent media organizations in the world, I oversee the writing and publishing of over 30 news articles each day and have overseen the hiring of hundreds of writers based on their writing and composition skills. I am also a published science writer with a No. 1 best-selling science book on Amazon.com (\u201cFood Forensics\u201d). It doesn\u2019t mean my own writing is completely error-free, but you don\u2019t see experienced writers making \u201cnewbie\u201d mistakes at the high frequency spotted in this Dr. Ford letter.<\/p>\n

I have added to Dr. Blumenthal\u2019s analysis after discovering additional discrepancies in the letter. Both Dr. Blumenthal and myself agree that the letter released by Sen. Dianne Feinstein is almost certainly a fake. It could not have possibly been written by Christine Blasey Ford, who has a Ph.D. and is a highly educated individual with several decades of writing experience.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s take a look at why.<\/p>\n

Note: You can see the original letter at\u00a0this Document Cloud link<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We have also mirrored the letter\u00a0at this link (PDF)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

14 mistakes that demonstrate the letter was not written by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford<\/h2>\n

Ph.D. writers are highly trained in writing. In fact, it is an essential part of their education. Yet the letter released by Sen. Dianne Feinstein is riddled with simple errors that point to a writing level that barely qualifies as \u201chigh school\u201d composition skills.<\/p>\n

Here are the 14 glaring mistakes and discrepancies in the letter:<\/p>\n

#1) \u201cin evaluating\u201d should be \u201cto evaluating\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The opening sentence of the letter states, \u201cI am writing with information relevant in evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court.\u201d This is an error. A Ph.D. would correctly state the letter offers information relevant\u00a0to<\/em>\u00a0evaluating the nominee, not \u201cin\u201d evaluating. In fact, a truly intelligent person would write, \u201cI am writing with information relevant to the evaluation of the current nominee\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

#2) The font size is altered in the line that mentions Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

The font size of the first line of the second paragraph, where Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s name is first mentioned, is oddly 140% the size of all the other lines in the document. This could indicate one of several things: 1) The line may have been altered after the fact by a person who failed to be careful in carrying out an attempted document alteration. 2) The document may have been printed on a printer that suffered a line feed problem on that one particular line. However, this problem would typically reveal horizontal white stripes in the line, and such lines do not appear. 3) The line may have been added in a rushed, last-minute fashion without careful attention to the font size.<\/p>\n

#3) \u201c1980\u2019s\u201d should be \u201c1980s\u201d \u2014 and any Ph.D. would immediately spot this obvious error<\/strong><\/p>\n

The first sentence in the second paragraph contains a glaring error. It states that \u201c\u2026sexually assaulted me during High School in the early 1980\u2019s.\u201d This use of the apostrophe in the \u201c1980\u2019s\u201d is a very common error made by people who possess poor writing skills, but those who are highly educated know that the proper construction is \u201c1980s\u201d (without an apostrophe). Why no apostrophe? Because it indicates possession, of course. And the \u201c1980\u201d isn\u2019t possessing anything here. She simply means the decade from 1980 to 1989. All professional writers know that is properly described as \u201c1980s.\u201d<\/p>\n

#4) The strange capitalization of \u201cHigh School\u201d \u2014 a newbie writing error<\/strong><\/p>\n

Also in the same phrase, \u201c\u2026sexually assaulted me during High School in the early 1980\u2019s,\u201d the writer inexplicably capitalizes \u201cHigh School.\u201d This is another obvious, \u201cnewbie\u201d error in writing that might typically be made by a very inexperienced or low-education individual. In this sentence, \u201cHigh School\u201d is not a proper noun, so it should not be capitalized. The proper time to capitalize such a phrase would occur if the full name of the high school in question were included, turning it into a proper name of a high school, such as the, \u201cMarjory Stoneman-Douglas High School.\u201d<\/p>\n

#5) \u201c1-2 years older than me and students\u201d error<\/strong><\/p>\n

The second sentence in the second paragraph states, \u201cBoth were 1-2 years older than me and students at a local private school.\u201d This is a grammatical error that\u2019s typical of low-skilled writers. A more skilled writer would have written something closer to, \u201cBoth were 1-2 years older than myself and other students at a local private school.\u201d The sentence is still awkward, but improved. The construction of this sentence smacks of a poorly educated individual with very little writing experience.<\/p>\n

#6) \u201cthat included me and 4 others\u201d error<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the second paragraph, the sentence, \u201cThe assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me and 4 others\u201d also seems awkward and highly indicative of a low-skilled writer. A more grammatically correct ending of the sentence would replace \u201cthat included me and 4 others\u201d with \u201cthat included myself and four others.\u201d<\/p>\n

#7) \u201cI feared he may inadvertently kill me\u201d word choice problem<\/strong><\/p>\n

One sentence claims, \u201cWith Kavanaugh\u2019s hand over my mouth, I feared he may inadvertently kill me.\u201d This reveals another mistaken word choice. The word \u201cmay\u201d implies present tense. An educated writer would use the word, \u201cmight\u201d instead, so that the phrase would read, \u201cI feared he might inadvertently kill me.\u201d<\/p>\n

#8 and #9) \u201cdrunken\u201d error and \u201cmixed words\u201d phrasing<\/strong><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s another sentence from the letter: \u201cFrom across the room, a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from \u2018go for it\u2019 to \u2018stop\u2019.\u201d This contains two oddly phrased words that indicate a very low level of writing skill. The term \u201cdrunken\u201d should have been written as \u201cdrunk.\u201d Only a very inexperienced writer would use the term \u201cdrunken.\u201d Similarly, the phrase \u201cmixed words\u201d seems to be something that a non-native English speaker would write, not a highly trained Ph.D. who went to a reputable university in America.<\/p>\n

#10) \u201cthe two scrapped with each other\u201d odd phrase<\/strong><\/p>\n

The next sentence claims, \u201cThe pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other.\u201d Again, this seems like a very odd choice of words for any accomplished, experienced writer. The entire sentence reads like something written by a non-native English speaker. Who says \u201cscrapped\u201d when they mean \u201cfought?\u201d<\/p>\n

#11) \u201copportune moment\u201d indicates a low-level writer attempting to sound sophisticated<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the tactics used by low-level writers to try to impress their intended audience is to use sophisticated-sounding words that are \u201cabove their pay grade,\u201d so to speak. I see this frequently in writing samples authored by young writers with very little writing experience. In this letter, the phrase, \u201c\u2026I was able to take this opportune moment to get up\u2026\u201d is a glaring red flag that the letter wasn\u2019t written by a well educated individual. Who uses \u201copportune\u201d in such a context? Only a low-level writer hoping the word makes them sound sophisticated.<\/p>\n

#12) Failure to capitalize \u201cI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a sentence near the end of the letter: \u201cIt is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet i felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.\u201d Note that the \u201ci\u201d is not capitalized in the phrase, \u201cyet i felt guilty.\u201d This is another red flag error only made by an extremely inexperienced writer. No Ph.D. would make such an error, but a low-information blogger or activist is very likely to make such an error. The failure to capitalize \u201cI\u201d words is also very common among younger writers below the age of 25.<\/p>\n

#13) \u201cyet i felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything\u201d strange phrase composition<\/strong><\/p>\n

This phrase suffers from poor sentence construction and a lack of clear thinking. The word \u201ccompelled\u201d implies an\u00a0action item<\/em>. People are compelled to\u00a0do things<\/em>. You do not experience being \u201ccompelled\u201d about an \u201cidea.\u201d The entire phase, \u201cyet i felt guilty and compelled\u2026 about the idea\u201d is not something an educated, experienced writer would write.<\/p>\n

#14) Christine Blasey, who says she is afraid to fly, is \u201cvacationing in the mid-Atlantic until August 7th and will be in California after August 10th.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is not a grammatical error; it is a logic problem. We\u2019ve been told for over a week that Christine Blasey Ford did not wish to testify in front of the U.S. Senate because she had a fear of flying. But in this letter, she is apparently flying great distances for a vacation. Her online photos also show her to be vacationing in Hawaii, which requires a very long flight.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

See a more detailed explanation here:<\/p>\n

Real.video\/5840008773001<\/a><\/p>\n