{"id":103395,"date":"2018-09-07T13:39:28","date_gmt":"2018-09-07T17:39:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=103395"},"modified":"2018-09-07T13:39:28","modified_gmt":"2018-09-07T17:39:28","slug":"i-know-who-the-senior-official-is-who-wrote-the-ny-times-op-ed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/?p=103395","title":{"rendered":"I Know Who the \u201cSenior Official\u201d Is Who Wrote the NY Times Op-Ed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paul Craig Roberts<\/p>\n

I know who wrote the anonymous \u201csenior Trump official\u201d op-ed in the New York Times. The New York Times wrote it.<\/p>\n

The op-ed (http:\/\/www.informationclearinghouse.info\/50194.htm<\/a>) is an obvious forgery. As a former senior official in a presidential administration, I can state with certainty that no senior official would express disagreement anonymously.\u00a0Anonymous dissent has no credibility.\u00a0<\/em>Moreover, the dishonor of it undermines the character of the writer.\u00a0A real dissenter would use his reputation and the status of his high position to lend weight to his dissent.<\/em><\/p>\n

The New York Times\u2019 claim to have vetted the writer also lacks credibility, as the New York Times has consistently printed extreme accusations against Trump and against Vladimir Putin without supplying a bit of evidence. The New York Times has consistently misrepresented unsubstantiated allegations as proven fact. There is no reason whatsoever to believe the New York Times about anything.<\/p>\n

Consider also whether a member of a conspiracy working \u201cdiligently\u201d inside the administration with \u201cmany of the senior officials\u201d to \u201cpreserve our democratic institutions while thwarting\u201d Trump\u2019s \u201cworst inclinations\u201d would\u00a0thwart his and his fellow co-conspirators\u2019 plot by revealing it!<\/em><\/p>\n

This forgery is an attempt to break up the Trump administration by creating suspicion throughout the senior level. If Trump falls for the New York Times\u2019 deception, a house cleaning is likely to take place wherever suspicion falls. A government full of mutual suspicion cannot function.<\/em><\/p>\n

The fake op-ed serves to validate from within the Trump administration the false reporting by the New York Times that serves the interests of the military\/security complex to hold on to enemies with whom Trump prefers to make peace. For example, the alleged \u201csenior official\u201d misrepresents, as does the New York Times, President Trump\u2019s efforts to reduce dangerous tensions with North Korea and Russia as President Trump\u2019s \u201cpreference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea\u2019s leader, Kim Jong-un\u201d over America\u2019s \u201callied, like-minded nations.\u201d This is the same non-sequitur that the New York Times has expressed endlessly.\u00a0Why is resolving dangerous tensions a \u201cpreference for dictators\u201d and not a preference for peace?\u00a0<\/em>The New York Times has never explained, and neither does the \u201csenior official.\u201d<\/p>\n

How is it that Putin, elected three times by majorities that no US president has ever received, is a dictator? Putin stepped down after serving the permitted two consecutive terms and was again elected after being out of office for a term. Do dictators step down and sit out for 6 years?<\/p>\n

The \u201csenior official\u201d also endorses as proven fact the alleged Skripal poisoning by a \u201cdeadly Russian nerve agent,\u201d an event for which not one scrap of evidence exists. Neither has anyone explained why the \u201cdeadly nerve agent\u201d wasn\u2019t deadly. The entire Skripal event rests only on assertions. The purpose of the Skripal hoax was precisely what President Trump said it was: to box him into further confrontation with Russia and prevent a reduction in tensions.<\/p>\n

If the \u201csenior official\u201d is really so uninformed as to believe that Putin is a dictator who attacked the Skripals with a deadly nerve agent and elected Trump president, the \u201csenior official\u201d is too dangerously ignorant and gullible to be a senior official in any administration. These are the New York Times\u2019 beliefs or professed beliefs as the New York Times does everything the organization can do to protect the military\/security complex\u2019s budget from any reduction in the \u201cenemy threat.\u201d<\/p>\n

Do you remember when Condoleezza Rice prepared the way for the US illegal invasion of Iraq with her imagery of \u201ca mushroom cloud going up over an American city\u201d? Iraq had no nuclear weapons, and everyone in the government knew it. There was no prospect of such an event. However, there is a very real prospect of mushroom clouds going up over many American and European cities if the crazed Russiaphobia of the New York Times and the other presstitutes along with the Democratic Party and the security elements of the deep state continue to pile lie after lie, provocation after provocation on Russia\u2019s patience. At some point, the only logical conclusion that the Russian government can reach is that Washington is preparing Americans and Europeans for an attack on Russia. Propaganda vilifying and demonizing the enemy precedes military attacks.<\/p>\n

The New York Times\u2019 other attack on President Trump\u2014that he is unstable and unfit for office\u2014is reproduced in the fake op-ed: \u201cGiven the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president,\u201d writes the invented and non-existent \u201csenior official.\u201d<\/p>\n

Americans are an insouciant people. But are any so insouciant that they really think that a senior official would write that the members of President Trump\u2019s cabinet have considered removing him from office? What is this statement other than a deliberate effort to produce a constitutional crisis\u2014the precise aim of John Brennan, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, the DNC, and the New York Times. A constitutional crisis is what the hoax of Russiagate is all about.<\/p>\n

The level of mendacity and evil in this plot against Trump is unequaled in history. Have any of these conspirators given a moment\u2019s thought to the consequences of\u00a0removing a president for his unwillingness to worsen the dangerously high tensions between nuclear powers?\u00a0<\/em>The next president would have to adopt a Russophobic stance and do nothing to reduce the tensions that can break out in nuclear war or himself be accused of \u201ccoddling the Russian dictator and putting America at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

The reason that America is at risk is that the CIA and the presstitute media have put America\u2014and Europe\u2014at risk by frustrating President Trump\u2019s intention to reduce the dangerous level of tensions between the two major nuclear powers. Professor Steven Cohen, America\u2019s premier Russian expert, says that never during the Cold War were tensions as high as they are at this present time. As a former member of The Committee on the Present Danger, I myself am a former Cold Warrior, and I know for a fact that Professor Cohen is correct.<\/p>\n

In America today, and in Europe, people are living in a situation in which the liberal-progressive-left\u2019s blind hatred of Donald Trump, together with the self-interested power and profit of the military security complex and election hopes of the Democratic Party, are recklessly and irresponsibly risking nuclear Armageddon for no other reason than to act out their hate and further their own nest.<\/p>\n

This plot against Trump is dangerous to life on earth and demands that the governments and peoples of the world act now to expose this plot and to bring it to an end before it kills us all.<\/p>\n

___
\nhttp:\/\/www.paulcraigroberts.org\/2018\/09\/06\/i-know-who-the-senior-official-is-who-wrote-the-ny-times-op-ed\/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=i_know_who_the_senior_official_is_who_wrote_the_ny_times_op_ed&utm_term=2018-09-06<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=103395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=103395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=103395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=103395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}