\n<\/strong>
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/sites\/default\/files\/inline-images\/download_13.jpg?itok=7TT9SZe5\")
<\/a>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/stateofthenation2012.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/download_13.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nNo clause or article of the Constitution, nor the Bill of Rights, is safe.<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n The George W. Bush and Obama regimes destroyed two of the most important protections of civil liberty\u2014habeas corpus and due process.<\/strong><\/p>\n Bush declared indefinite imprisonment on suspicion alone without evidence or trial. Obama declared execution of US citizens on accusation alone without due process. The Justice (sic) Department wrote legal memos justifying torture, thus destroying the constitutional protection against self-incrimination. One of the authors of the memos is now a professor of law at UC Berkeley. The other is now a federal judge, indications that respect for the Constitution and enforcement of US and international laws against torture is fading in law schools and the federal judiciary.<\/p>\n A third important protection of civil liberty – freedom of speech which is necessary for the discovery of truth and to serve justice – is being destroyed.\u00a0<\/strong>Apple, Google\/Facebook, Twitter, Spotify, university speech codes, legislation against protesting Israel\u2019s atrocities against Palestinians, and the presstitute media that has been turned into a propaganda organ in behalf of vested interests are all actively involved in protecting lies against truth.<\/p>\n Glenn Greenwald reported<\/a>\u00a0that \u201cthe single greatest threat to free speech in the West\u00a0\u2014 and in the U.S. \u2014 is the coordinated, growing campaign to outlaw and punish those who advocate for, or participate in,\u00a0activism to end the Israeli occupation\u201d of Palestine.<\/p>\n The Second Amendment, which was placed in the Constitution as a defense against oppression by government, is under attack by well financed organizations in service to the police state with the intention of disarming the population.\u00a0<\/strong>Many attentive Americans are convinced that mass shootings are staged or pretended in order to create public support for repealing the Second Amendment. Clearly the amount of effort expended against the Second Amendment is disproportional to the number of shooting deaths as compared to other causes of deaths. Why this one cause of deaths has so many well financed and politically active organizations compared to other causes of deaths is a question that is studiously avoided. We see far more opposition to the Second Amendment than we see against Washington\u2019s destruction in whole or part of seven countries during the past two decades, resulting in the death, maiming, widowing, orphaning and displacement of millions of peoples.<\/p>\n In an Orwellian twist, freedom of religion is now interpreted as a prohibition against celebrating Christianity, the religious basis of the country, in public arenas.<\/strong><\/p>\n Law faculties and the ACLU have deemphasized the original rights specified in the Constitution, emphasizing instead rights for transgendered, homosexuals, illegal aliens, and those seeking and performing abortions\u2014a horrendous crime only a few decades ago.<\/p>\n Today all it takes to trump the US Constitution is to utter \u201cNational Security.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n As the United States is the Constitution, destroying the Constitution destroys the United States. Yet those destroying the Constitution claim that they are making the country safe by substituting police state measures for civil liberty.<\/p>\n The newly invented rights and the speech codes are used as weapons against heterosexual white males and to transfer authority from white male professors and managers to university and corporate \u201cdiversity offices\u201d acting in behalf of \u201coppressed minorities\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0(women, non-white races except apparently Asians, homosexuals, transgendered). In the August 2018 issue of\u00a0Chronicles<\/em>, a magazine of American culture, Jack Trotter relates one of his experiences as an assistant professor \u201cat a major Southern university, one of those SEC football titans.\u201d In a lecture he encouraged his students to \u201cavoid excessive use of abstract, Latinate terms in their writing.\u201d He was accused of committing a racist crime of advocating white superiority by expressing a preference for short words with clear meaning that comprise Anglo-Saxon vocabulary. The absurd charge was placed in Trotter\u2019s university file for internal use in the event he gave further indications of white supremacy by uttering the term Anglo-Saxon.<\/p>\n It gets even more ridiculous than this. A professor I know at a major research university was\u00a0unaware that \u201cgirls\u201d had been made an insensitive word and used it in class.\u00a0<\/strong>He was called before a diversity dean and told that one more infraction and he would have to attend a class in \u201cdiversity training.\u201d<\/p>\n The same thing happened to a graduate student at an English University who was one Friday afternoon sitting talking with three secretaries who were describing the evening out they had planned. He said: \u201csounds like a fun girls\u2019 night out.\u201d The expression \u201cgirls night out\u201d is an old one widely used by women themselves, but the secretaries took offense at the word \u201cgirls,\u201d complained, and the graduate student was subjected to sensitivity training.<\/p>\n